Additional complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation does not improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background: Non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) has a complex pathophysiological process. The standard catheter ablation approach is pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The additional value of complex fractionated electrogram (CFAE) ablation is still unclear. We aimed to investigate the additional v...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yoga Waranugraha, Ardian Rizal, Dion Setiawan, Indra Jabbar Aziz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-01-01
Series:Indian Heart Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483220302704
id doaj-5b57a27b19344c188275b04806b074e7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5b57a27b19344c188275b04806b074e72021-03-13T04:21:14ZengElsevierIndian Heart Journal0019-48322021-01-017316373Additional complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation does not improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsYoga Waranugraha0Ardian Rizal1Dion Setiawan2Indra Jabbar Aziz3Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia; Brawijaya Cardiovascular Research Center, Malang, Indonesia; Corresponding author.Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia; Brawijaya Cardiovascular Research Center, Malang, IndonesiaBrawijaya Cardiovascular Research Center, Malang, IndonesiaBrawijaya Cardiovascular Research Center, Malang, IndonesiaBackground: Non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) has a complex pathophysiological process. The standard catheter ablation approach is pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The additional value of complex fractionated electrogram (CFAE) ablation is still unclear. We aimed to investigate the additional value of CFAE ablation for non-paroxysmal AF. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies up to May 2020. Articles comparing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus CFAE ablation and PVI alone for AF were obtained from the electronic scientific databases. The pooled mean difference (MD) and pooled risk ratio (RR) were assessed. Results: A total of 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 1034 patients were involved. Following a single catheter ablation procedure, the presence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) with or without the use of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) between both groups were not significantly different (RR = 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.97–1.24; p = 0.13). Similar results were also obtained for the presence of any ATA without the use of AADs (RR = 1.08; 95% CI = 0.96–1.22; p = 0.2). The additional CFAE ablation took longer procedure times (MD = 46.95 min; 95% CI = 38.27–55.63; p = < 0.01) and fluoroscopy times (MD = 11.69 min; 95% CI = 8.54–14.83; p = < 0.01). Conclusion: Additional CFAE ablation failed to improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal AF patients. It also requires a longer duration of procedure times and fluoroscopy times.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483220302704CFAE ablationPulmonary vein isolationNon-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yoga Waranugraha
Ardian Rizal
Dion Setiawan
Indra Jabbar Aziz
spellingShingle Yoga Waranugraha
Ardian Rizal
Dion Setiawan
Indra Jabbar Aziz
Additional complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation does not improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Indian Heart Journal
CFAE ablation
Pulmonary vein isolation
Non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
author_facet Yoga Waranugraha
Ardian Rizal
Dion Setiawan
Indra Jabbar Aziz
author_sort Yoga Waranugraha
title Additional complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation does not improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Additional complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation does not improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Additional complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation does not improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Additional complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation does not improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Additional complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation does not improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort additional complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation does not improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
publisher Elsevier
series Indian Heart Journal
issn 0019-4832
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Background: Non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) has a complex pathophysiological process. The standard catheter ablation approach is pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The additional value of complex fractionated electrogram (CFAE) ablation is still unclear. We aimed to investigate the additional value of CFAE ablation for non-paroxysmal AF. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies up to May 2020. Articles comparing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus CFAE ablation and PVI alone for AF were obtained from the electronic scientific databases. The pooled mean difference (MD) and pooled risk ratio (RR) were assessed. Results: A total of 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 1034 patients were involved. Following a single catheter ablation procedure, the presence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) with or without the use of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) between both groups were not significantly different (RR = 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.97–1.24; p = 0.13). Similar results were also obtained for the presence of any ATA without the use of AADs (RR = 1.08; 95% CI = 0.96–1.22; p = 0.2). The additional CFAE ablation took longer procedure times (MD = 46.95 min; 95% CI = 38.27–55.63; p = < 0.01) and fluoroscopy times (MD = 11.69 min; 95% CI = 8.54–14.83; p = < 0.01). Conclusion: Additional CFAE ablation failed to improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal AF patients. It also requires a longer duration of procedure times and fluoroscopy times.
topic CFAE ablation
Pulmonary vein isolation
Non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483220302704
work_keys_str_mv AT yogawaranugraha additionalcomplexfractionatedatrialelectrogramablationdoesnotimprovetheoutcomesofnonparoxysmalatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT ardianrizal additionalcomplexfractionatedatrialelectrogramablationdoesnotimprovetheoutcomesofnonparoxysmalatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT dionsetiawan additionalcomplexfractionatedatrialelectrogramablationdoesnotimprovetheoutcomesofnonparoxysmalatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT indrajabbaraziz additionalcomplexfractionatedatrialelectrogramablationdoesnotimprovetheoutcomesofnonparoxysmalatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
_version_ 1724222290347950080