Additional complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation does not improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Background: Non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) has a complex pathophysiological process. The standard catheter ablation approach is pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The additional value of complex fractionated electrogram (CFAE) ablation is still unclear. We aimed to investigate the additional v...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Indian Heart Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483220302704 |
id |
doaj-5b57a27b19344c188275b04806b074e7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5b57a27b19344c188275b04806b074e72021-03-13T04:21:14ZengElsevierIndian Heart Journal0019-48322021-01-017316373Additional complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation does not improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsYoga Waranugraha0Ardian Rizal1Dion Setiawan2Indra Jabbar Aziz3Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia; Brawijaya Cardiovascular Research Center, Malang, Indonesia; Corresponding author.Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia; Brawijaya Cardiovascular Research Center, Malang, IndonesiaBrawijaya Cardiovascular Research Center, Malang, IndonesiaBrawijaya Cardiovascular Research Center, Malang, IndonesiaBackground: Non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) has a complex pathophysiological process. The standard catheter ablation approach is pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The additional value of complex fractionated electrogram (CFAE) ablation is still unclear. We aimed to investigate the additional value of CFAE ablation for non-paroxysmal AF. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies up to May 2020. Articles comparing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus CFAE ablation and PVI alone for AF were obtained from the electronic scientific databases. The pooled mean difference (MD) and pooled risk ratio (RR) were assessed. Results: A total of 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 1034 patients were involved. Following a single catheter ablation procedure, the presence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) with or without the use of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) between both groups were not significantly different (RR = 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.97–1.24; p = 0.13). Similar results were also obtained for the presence of any ATA without the use of AADs (RR = 1.08; 95% CI = 0.96–1.22; p = 0.2). The additional CFAE ablation took longer procedure times (MD = 46.95 min; 95% CI = 38.27–55.63; p = < 0.01) and fluoroscopy times (MD = 11.69 min; 95% CI = 8.54–14.83; p = < 0.01). Conclusion: Additional CFAE ablation failed to improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal AF patients. It also requires a longer duration of procedure times and fluoroscopy times.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483220302704CFAE ablationPulmonary vein isolationNon-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yoga Waranugraha Ardian Rizal Dion Setiawan Indra Jabbar Aziz |
spellingShingle |
Yoga Waranugraha Ardian Rizal Dion Setiawan Indra Jabbar Aziz Additional complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation does not improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Indian Heart Journal CFAE ablation Pulmonary vein isolation Non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation |
author_facet |
Yoga Waranugraha Ardian Rizal Dion Setiawan Indra Jabbar Aziz |
author_sort |
Yoga Waranugraha |
title |
Additional complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation does not improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short |
Additional complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation does not improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full |
Additional complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation does not improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr |
Additional complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation does not improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed |
Additional complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation does not improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort |
additional complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation does not improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Indian Heart Journal |
issn |
0019-4832 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Background: Non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) has a complex pathophysiological process. The standard catheter ablation approach is pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The additional value of complex fractionated electrogram (CFAE) ablation is still unclear. We aimed to investigate the additional value of CFAE ablation for non-paroxysmal AF. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies up to May 2020. Articles comparing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus CFAE ablation and PVI alone for AF were obtained from the electronic scientific databases. The pooled mean difference (MD) and pooled risk ratio (RR) were assessed. Results: A total of 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 1034 patients were involved. Following a single catheter ablation procedure, the presence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) with or without the use of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) between both groups were not significantly different (RR = 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.97–1.24; p = 0.13). Similar results were also obtained for the presence of any ATA without the use of AADs (RR = 1.08; 95% CI = 0.96–1.22; p = 0.2). The additional CFAE ablation took longer procedure times (MD = 46.95 min; 95% CI = 38.27–55.63; p = < 0.01) and fluoroscopy times (MD = 11.69 min; 95% CI = 8.54–14.83; p = < 0.01). Conclusion: Additional CFAE ablation failed to improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal AF patients. It also requires a longer duration of procedure times and fluoroscopy times. |
topic |
CFAE ablation Pulmonary vein isolation Non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483220302704 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yogawaranugraha additionalcomplexfractionatedatrialelectrogramablationdoesnotimprovetheoutcomesofnonparoxysmalatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT ardianrizal additionalcomplexfractionatedatrialelectrogramablationdoesnotimprovetheoutcomesofnonparoxysmalatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT dionsetiawan additionalcomplexfractionatedatrialelectrogramablationdoesnotimprovetheoutcomesofnonparoxysmalatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT indrajabbaraziz additionalcomplexfractionatedatrialelectrogramablationdoesnotimprovetheoutcomesofnonparoxysmalatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |
_version_ |
1724222290347950080 |