Effects of the truth FinishIt brand on tobacco outcomes

Since 2000, the truth campaign has grown as a social marketing brand. Back then, truth employed branding to compete directly with the tobacco industry. In 2014, the launch of truth FinishIt reflected changes in the brand's strategy, the tobacco control environment, and youth/young adult behavio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: W. Douglas Evans, Jessica M. Rath, Elizabeth C. Hair, Jeremy Williams Snider, Lindsay Pitzer, Marisa Greenberg, Haijun Xiao, Jennifer Cantrell, Donna Vallone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-03-01
Series:Preventive Medicine Reports
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335517301705
id doaj-5b505622c5a347e89cf0f0aec9a2e47d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5b505622c5a347e89cf0f0aec9a2e47d2020-11-25T03:28:00ZengElsevierPreventive Medicine Reports2211-33552018-03-019611Effects of the truth FinishIt brand on tobacco outcomesW. Douglas Evans0Jessica M. Rath1Elizabeth C. Hair2Jeremy Williams Snider3Lindsay Pitzer4Marisa Greenberg5Haijun Xiao6Jennifer Cantrell7Donna Vallone8Department of Prevention and Community Health & Global Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA; Corresponding author.Evaluation Science & Research at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USA; Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USAEvaluation Science & Research at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USA; Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USAFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USAEvaluation Science & Research at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USAEvaluation Science & Research at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USAEvaluation Science & Research at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USAEvaluation Science & Research at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USA; Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USAEvaluation Science & Research at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USA; College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USASince 2000, the truth campaign has grown as a social marketing brand. Back then, truth employed branding to compete directly with the tobacco industry. In 2014, the launch of truth FinishIt reflected changes in the brand's strategy, the tobacco control environment, and youth/young adult behavior.Building on a previous validation study, the current study examined brand equity in truth FinishIt, as measured by validated multi-dimensional scales, and tobacco related attitudes, beliefs, and behavior based on two waves of the Truth Longitudinal Cohort data from 2015 and 2016. A fixed effects logistic regression was used to estimate the change in brand equity between panel survey waves 3 and 4 on past 30-day smoking among ever and current smokers. Additional models determined the effects of brand equity predicting tobacco attitudes/use at follow up among the full sample. All analyses controlled for demographic factors.A one-point increase in the brand equity scale between the two waves was associated with a 66% greater chance of not smoking among ever smokers (OR 1.66, CI 1.11–2.48, p<0.05) and an 80% greater chance of not smoking among current smokers (OR 1.80, CI 1.05–3.10, p<0.05). Higher overall truth brand equity at wave 3 predicted less smoking at wave 4 and more positive anti-tobacco attitudes. Being male, younger, and non-white predicted some of the tobacco related attitudes.Future research should examine long-term effects of brand equity on tobacco use and how tobacco control can optimize the use of branding in campaigns. Keywords: Tobacco, Smoking, Social marketing, Branding, Preventionhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335517301705
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author W. Douglas Evans
Jessica M. Rath
Elizabeth C. Hair
Jeremy Williams Snider
Lindsay Pitzer
Marisa Greenberg
Haijun Xiao
Jennifer Cantrell
Donna Vallone
spellingShingle W. Douglas Evans
Jessica M. Rath
Elizabeth C. Hair
Jeremy Williams Snider
Lindsay Pitzer
Marisa Greenberg
Haijun Xiao
Jennifer Cantrell
Donna Vallone
Effects of the truth FinishIt brand on tobacco outcomes
Preventive Medicine Reports
author_facet W. Douglas Evans
Jessica M. Rath
Elizabeth C. Hair
Jeremy Williams Snider
Lindsay Pitzer
Marisa Greenberg
Haijun Xiao
Jennifer Cantrell
Donna Vallone
author_sort W. Douglas Evans
title Effects of the truth FinishIt brand on tobacco outcomes
title_short Effects of the truth FinishIt brand on tobacco outcomes
title_full Effects of the truth FinishIt brand on tobacco outcomes
title_fullStr Effects of the truth FinishIt brand on tobacco outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Effects of the truth FinishIt brand on tobacco outcomes
title_sort effects of the truth finishit brand on tobacco outcomes
publisher Elsevier
series Preventive Medicine Reports
issn 2211-3355
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Since 2000, the truth campaign has grown as a social marketing brand. Back then, truth employed branding to compete directly with the tobacco industry. In 2014, the launch of truth FinishIt reflected changes in the brand's strategy, the tobacco control environment, and youth/young adult behavior.Building on a previous validation study, the current study examined brand equity in truth FinishIt, as measured by validated multi-dimensional scales, and tobacco related attitudes, beliefs, and behavior based on two waves of the Truth Longitudinal Cohort data from 2015 and 2016. A fixed effects logistic regression was used to estimate the change in brand equity between panel survey waves 3 and 4 on past 30-day smoking among ever and current smokers. Additional models determined the effects of brand equity predicting tobacco attitudes/use at follow up among the full sample. All analyses controlled for demographic factors.A one-point increase in the brand equity scale between the two waves was associated with a 66% greater chance of not smoking among ever smokers (OR 1.66, CI 1.11–2.48, p<0.05) and an 80% greater chance of not smoking among current smokers (OR 1.80, CI 1.05–3.10, p<0.05). Higher overall truth brand equity at wave 3 predicted less smoking at wave 4 and more positive anti-tobacco attitudes. Being male, younger, and non-white predicted some of the tobacco related attitudes.Future research should examine long-term effects of brand equity on tobacco use and how tobacco control can optimize the use of branding in campaigns. Keywords: Tobacco, Smoking, Social marketing, Branding, Prevention
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335517301705
work_keys_str_mv AT wdouglasevans effectsofthetruthfinishitbrandontobaccooutcomes
AT jessicamrath effectsofthetruthfinishitbrandontobaccooutcomes
AT elizabethchair effectsofthetruthfinishitbrandontobaccooutcomes
AT jeremywilliamssnider effectsofthetruthfinishitbrandontobaccooutcomes
AT lindsaypitzer effectsofthetruthfinishitbrandontobaccooutcomes
AT marisagreenberg effectsofthetruthfinishitbrandontobaccooutcomes
AT haijunxiao effectsofthetruthfinishitbrandontobaccooutcomes
AT jennifercantrell effectsofthetruthfinishitbrandontobaccooutcomes
AT donnavallone effectsofthetruthfinishitbrandontobaccooutcomes
_version_ 1724585877755133952