Legislative Developments in Rail Transport in 2011

Most amendments of the Polish rail transport law in 2011 concerned the organisation of rail transport including: improvements in timetable changing procedures; mechanisms to ensure the observance and early publication of timetables; interoperability of the rail system and; certification of train dri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Katarzyna Bożekowska-Zawisza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Warsaw 2012-11-01
Series:Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Online Access:https://yars.wz.uw.edu.pl/images/yars2012_5_7/237.pdf
id doaj-5b47866bd59b47cbb67b83f49d87c520
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5b47866bd59b47cbb67b83f49d87c5202020-11-25T04:08:04ZengUniversity of WarsawYearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies1689-90242545-01152012-11-0157237250Legislative Developments in Rail Transport in 2011Katarzyna Bożekowska-ZawiszaMost amendments of the Polish rail transport law in 2011 concerned the organisation of rail transport including: improvements in timetable changing procedures; mechanisms to ensure the observance and early publication of timetables; interoperability of the rail system and; certification of train drivers. Introduced were also some changes meant to restructure the incumbent state rail operator (in Polish: Polskie Koleje Państwowe; hereafter PKP). The short, but important, amendment of the Act on Commercialization, Restructuring and Privatization of state enterprise ‘PKP’ seeks to guarantee the independence from railway operators of the personnel of the infrastructure manager (in Polish: PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe; hereafter PKP PKL). The rail infrastructure manager’s lack of autonomy was one of the Commission’s allegations against Poland in the case C-512/10 which is yet to be decided by the Court of Justice of the European Union. The Polish case is analogues to other cases filed by the Commission concerning the incompatibility of Member States’ laws with the first EU railway package (C-473/10 Commission v. Hungary, C-483/10 Commission v. Spain, C-555/10 Commission v. Austria, C-556/10 Commission v. Germany, C-545/10 Commission v. Czech Republic, C-627/10 Commission v. Slovenia, C-625/10 Commission v. France).https://yars.wz.uw.edu.pl/images/yars2012_5_7/237.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Katarzyna Bożekowska-Zawisza
spellingShingle Katarzyna Bożekowska-Zawisza
Legislative Developments in Rail Transport in 2011
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
author_facet Katarzyna Bożekowska-Zawisza
author_sort Katarzyna Bożekowska-Zawisza
title Legislative Developments in Rail Transport in 2011
title_short Legislative Developments in Rail Transport in 2011
title_full Legislative Developments in Rail Transport in 2011
title_fullStr Legislative Developments in Rail Transport in 2011
title_full_unstemmed Legislative Developments in Rail Transport in 2011
title_sort legislative developments in rail transport in 2011
publisher University of Warsaw
series Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
issn 1689-9024
2545-0115
publishDate 2012-11-01
description Most amendments of the Polish rail transport law in 2011 concerned the organisation of rail transport including: improvements in timetable changing procedures; mechanisms to ensure the observance and early publication of timetables; interoperability of the rail system and; certification of train drivers. Introduced were also some changes meant to restructure the incumbent state rail operator (in Polish: Polskie Koleje Państwowe; hereafter PKP). The short, but important, amendment of the Act on Commercialization, Restructuring and Privatization of state enterprise ‘PKP’ seeks to guarantee the independence from railway operators of the personnel of the infrastructure manager (in Polish: PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe; hereafter PKP PKL). The rail infrastructure manager’s lack of autonomy was one of the Commission’s allegations against Poland in the case C-512/10 which is yet to be decided by the Court of Justice of the European Union. The Polish case is analogues to other cases filed by the Commission concerning the incompatibility of Member States’ laws with the first EU railway package (C-473/10 Commission v. Hungary, C-483/10 Commission v. Spain, C-555/10 Commission v. Austria, C-556/10 Commission v. Germany, C-545/10 Commission v. Czech Republic, C-627/10 Commission v. Slovenia, C-625/10 Commission v. France).
url https://yars.wz.uw.edu.pl/images/yars2012_5_7/237.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT katarzynabozekowskazawisza legislativedevelopmentsinrailtransportin2011
_version_ 1724426894698348544