Criteria for reception of decisions on the crimes of contempt of the interamerican human rights system in the superior court of justice in light of the external conventionality control

The article deals, in the light of conventional control, with the receipt of the recommendation of the Inter-American Human Rights System to decriminalize crimes of contempt by the Superior Court of Justice. The analysis is limited to two features that guide the Court’s positions: Special Appeal 1,6...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Marcelo Markus Teixeira, Reginaldo Pereira, Andrey Luciano Bieger
Format:	Article
Language:	deu
Published:	Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina 2019-01-01
Series:	Sequência: Estudos Juridicos e Politicos
Subjects:	Desacato Liberdade de expressão Controle de convencionalidade
Online Access:	https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/58920

id	doaj-5b44f78dc93d4399b8e8046eb19e2a7d
record_format	Article
spelling	doaj-5b44f78dc93d4399b8e8046eb19e2a7d2020-11-25T00:10:20ZdeuUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaSequência: Estudos Juridicos e Politicos0101-95622177-70552019-01-01398017920110.5007/2177-7055.2018v39n80p17930132Criteria for reception of decisions on the crimes of contempt of the interamerican human rights system in the superior court of justice in light of the external conventionality controlMarcelo Markus Teixeira0Reginaldo Pereira1Andrey Luciano Bieger2Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó (UNOCHAPECÓ)Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó (UNOCHAPECÓ)Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó (UNOCHAPECÓ)The article deals, in the light of conventional control, with the receipt of the recommendation of the Inter-American Human Rights System to decriminalize crimes of contempt by the Superior Court of Justice. The analysis is limited to two features that guide the Court’s positions: Special Appeal 1,640,084/SP and Habeas Corpus 379,269/MS. The method is inductive and bibliographic review and documentary analysis are used as research techniques. It is concluded that the Superior Court of Justice considered only decisions in which the State was party to the litigation, which rules out the reception through the mechanism of external conventionality control.https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/58920DesacatoLiberdade de expressãoControle de convencionalidade
collection	DOAJ
language	deu
format	Article
sources	DOAJ
author	Marcelo Markus Teixeira Reginaldo Pereira Andrey Luciano Bieger
spellingShingle	Marcelo Markus Teixeira Reginaldo Pereira Andrey Luciano Bieger Criteria for reception of decisions on the crimes of contempt of the interamerican human rights system in the superior court of justice in light of the external conventionality control Sequência: Estudos Juridicos e Politicos Desacato Liberdade de expressão Controle de convencionalidade
author_facet	Marcelo Markus Teixeira Reginaldo Pereira Andrey Luciano Bieger
author_sort	Marcelo Markus Teixeira
title	Criteria for reception of decisions on the crimes of contempt of the interamerican human rights system in the superior court of justice in light of the external conventionality control
title_short	Criteria for reception of decisions on the crimes of contempt of the interamerican human rights system in the superior court of justice in light of the external conventionality control
title_full	Criteria for reception of decisions on the crimes of contempt of the interamerican human rights system in the superior court of justice in light of the external conventionality control
title_fullStr	Criteria for reception of decisions on the crimes of contempt of the interamerican human rights system in the superior court of justice in light of the external conventionality control
title_full_unstemmed	Criteria for reception of decisions on the crimes of contempt of the interamerican human rights system in the superior court of justice in light of the external conventionality control
title_sort	criteria for reception of decisions on the crimes of contempt of the interamerican human rights system in the superior court of justice in light of the external conventionality control
publisher	Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
series	Sequência: Estudos Juridicos e Politicos
issn	0101-9562 2177-7055
publishDate	2019-01-01
description	The article deals, in the light of conventional control, with the receipt of the recommendation of the Inter-American Human Rights System to decriminalize crimes of contempt by the Superior Court of Justice. The analysis is limited to two features that guide the Court’s positions: Special Appeal 1,640,084/SP and Habeas Corpus 379,269/MS. The method is inductive and bibliographic review and documentary analysis are used as research techniques. It is concluded that the Superior Court of Justice considered only decisions in which the State was party to the litigation, which rules out the reception through the mechanism of external conventionality control.
topic	Desacato Liberdade de expressão Controle de convencionalidade
url	https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/58920
work_keys_str_mv	AT marcelomarkusteixeira criteriaforreceptionofdecisionsonthecrimesofcontemptoftheinteramericanhumanrightssysteminthesuperiorcourtofjusticeinlightoftheexternalconventionalitycontrol AT reginaldopereira criteriaforreceptionofdecisionsonthecrimesofcontemptoftheinteramericanhumanrightssysteminthesuperiorcourtofjusticeinlightoftheexternalconventionalitycontrol AT andreylucianobieger criteriaforreceptionofdecisionsonthecrimesofcontemptoftheinteramericanhumanrightssysteminthesuperiorcourtofjusticeinlightoftheexternalconventionalitycontrol
_version_	1725408104659550208

Criteria for reception of decisions on the crimes of contempt of the interamerican human rights system in the superior court of justice in light of the external conventionality control

Similar Items