Sequential Adoption and Cost Savings from Precision Agriculture

Precision agricultural (PA) technologies can decrease input costs by providing farmers with more detailed information and application control, but adoption has been sluggish, especially for variable-rate technologies (VRT). Is it possible that farmers have difficulty realizing these cost savings? Co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David Schimmelpfennig, Robert Ebel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Western Agricultural Economics Association 2016-01-01
Series:Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/230776
id doaj-5b329c2f102041deaa72b1a27c0b2ada
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5b329c2f102041deaa72b1a27c0b2ada2020-11-25T01:10:22ZengWestern Agricultural Economics AssociationJournal of Agricultural and Resource Economics1068-55022327-82852016-01-014119711510.22004/ag.econ.230776230776Sequential Adoption and Cost Savings from Precision AgricultureDavid SchimmelpfennigRobert EbelPrecision agricultural (PA) technologies can decrease input costs by providing farmers with more detailed information and application control, but adoption has been sluggish, especially for variable-rate technologies (VRT). Is it possible that farmers have difficulty realizing these cost savings? Combinations of PA technologies are considered as complements, testing several patterns of PA technology adoption that may show different levels of costs. The USDA's Agricultural Resource Management Survey of corn producers is used to estimate a treatment-effects model that allows for selection bias. VRT contributes additional production cost savings when added to soil mapping, but not when done with yield mapping alone.https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/230776crop production information technologiesjoint adoptiontechnology adoption
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David Schimmelpfennig
Robert Ebel
spellingShingle David Schimmelpfennig
Robert Ebel
Sequential Adoption and Cost Savings from Precision Agriculture
Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
crop production information technologies
joint adoption
technology adoption
author_facet David Schimmelpfennig
Robert Ebel
author_sort David Schimmelpfennig
title Sequential Adoption and Cost Savings from Precision Agriculture
title_short Sequential Adoption and Cost Savings from Precision Agriculture
title_full Sequential Adoption and Cost Savings from Precision Agriculture
title_fullStr Sequential Adoption and Cost Savings from Precision Agriculture
title_full_unstemmed Sequential Adoption and Cost Savings from Precision Agriculture
title_sort sequential adoption and cost savings from precision agriculture
publisher Western Agricultural Economics Association
series Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
issn 1068-5502
2327-8285
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Precision agricultural (PA) technologies can decrease input costs by providing farmers with more detailed information and application control, but adoption has been sluggish, especially for variable-rate technologies (VRT). Is it possible that farmers have difficulty realizing these cost savings? Combinations of PA technologies are considered as complements, testing several patterns of PA technology adoption that may show different levels of costs. The USDA's Agricultural Resource Management Survey of corn producers is used to estimate a treatment-effects model that allows for selection bias. VRT contributes additional production cost savings when added to soil mapping, but not when done with yield mapping alone.
topic crop production information technologies
joint adoption
technology adoption
url https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/230776
work_keys_str_mv AT davidschimmelpfennig sequentialadoptionandcostsavingsfromprecisionagriculture
AT robertebel sequentialadoptionandcostsavingsfromprecisionagriculture
_version_ 1725175230601625600