Estimating the Development of the Latvian — Estonian — Russian Transboundary Tourism and Recreation Region

In 2004, the Pskov — Livonia Euroregion was established across the borders of Estonia, Latvia and Russia (the Pskov region). Tourism became a cooperation priority in the Euroregion. This necessitated research on the local tourism and recreation areas. This study aims to estimate the development pros...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manakov A. G., Golomidova E. S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University 2018-05-01
Series:Baltic Region
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/5a2/Manakov_130-141.pdf
id doaj-5b241c006f214e2199083e6bfe3d1225
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5b241c006f214e2199083e6bfe3d12252020-11-24T20:59:56ZengImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversityBaltic Region2079-85552310-05242018-05-0110113014110.5922/2079-8555-2018-1-8Estimating the Development of the Latvian — Estonian — Russian Transboundary Tourism and Recreation RegionManakov A. G.Golomidova E. S.In 2004, the Pskov — Livonia Euroregion was established across the borders of Estonia, Latvia and Russia (the Pskov region). Tourism became a cooperation priority in the Euroregion. This necessitated research on the local tourism and recreation areas. This study aims to estimate the development prospects of transboundary microregions which have been identified by the authors within the Latvian-Estonian-Russian tourism and recreation mesoregion. The authors employ ten additional criteria proposed in the general conception of transboundary tourism and recreation regions. The article identifies five microregions: Pskov-Pechory- Tartu and Pskov-Izborsk-Cesis (first level), Pytalovo-Rezekne (second level), and Izborsk- Pechory district- Setomaa and Lake Chudskoe area (third level). The authors classify the microregions according to their level of development. The development of the Izborsk-Pechory district-Setomaa microregion is defined as ‘above average’, that of Pskov-Pechory-Tartu as ‘average’, and that of Pskov-Izborsk-Cesis as ‘below average’, and finally, the development of Pytalovo-Rezekne microregion is described as ‘poor’. The Lake Chudskoe area microregion is classified as an ‘emerging’ one. The overall level of development of transboundary tourism and recreation microregions is assessed as ‘below average’. The results of the study can be used in preparing recommendations for the development of transboundary microregions within the Latvian-Estonian-Russian tourism and recreation mesoregion. https://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/5a2/Manakov_130-141.pdftransboundary regiontourismrecreationPskov regionEstoniaLatvia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Manakov A. G.
Golomidova E. S.
spellingShingle Manakov A. G.
Golomidova E. S.
Estimating the Development of the Latvian — Estonian — Russian Transboundary Tourism and Recreation Region
Baltic Region
transboundary region
tourism
recreation
Pskov region
Estonia
Latvia
author_facet Manakov A. G.
Golomidova E. S.
author_sort Manakov A. G.
title Estimating the Development of the Latvian — Estonian — Russian Transboundary Tourism and Recreation Region
title_short Estimating the Development of the Latvian — Estonian — Russian Transboundary Tourism and Recreation Region
title_full Estimating the Development of the Latvian — Estonian — Russian Transboundary Tourism and Recreation Region
title_fullStr Estimating the Development of the Latvian — Estonian — Russian Transboundary Tourism and Recreation Region
title_full_unstemmed Estimating the Development of the Latvian — Estonian — Russian Transboundary Tourism and Recreation Region
title_sort estimating the development of the latvian — estonian — russian transboundary tourism and recreation region
publisher Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
series Baltic Region
issn 2079-8555
2310-0524
publishDate 2018-05-01
description In 2004, the Pskov — Livonia Euroregion was established across the borders of Estonia, Latvia and Russia (the Pskov region). Tourism became a cooperation priority in the Euroregion. This necessitated research on the local tourism and recreation areas. This study aims to estimate the development prospects of transboundary microregions which have been identified by the authors within the Latvian-Estonian-Russian tourism and recreation mesoregion. The authors employ ten additional criteria proposed in the general conception of transboundary tourism and recreation regions. The article identifies five microregions: Pskov-Pechory- Tartu and Pskov-Izborsk-Cesis (first level), Pytalovo-Rezekne (second level), and Izborsk- Pechory district- Setomaa and Lake Chudskoe area (third level). The authors classify the microregions according to their level of development. The development of the Izborsk-Pechory district-Setomaa microregion is defined as ‘above average’, that of Pskov-Pechory-Tartu as ‘average’, and that of Pskov-Izborsk-Cesis as ‘below average’, and finally, the development of Pytalovo-Rezekne microregion is described as ‘poor’. The Lake Chudskoe area microregion is classified as an ‘emerging’ one. The overall level of development of transboundary tourism and recreation microregions is assessed as ‘below average’. The results of the study can be used in preparing recommendations for the development of transboundary microregions within the Latvian-Estonian-Russian tourism and recreation mesoregion.
topic transboundary region
tourism
recreation
Pskov region
Estonia
Latvia
url https://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/5a2/Manakov_130-141.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT manakovag estimatingthedevelopmentofthelatvianestonianrussiantransboundarytourismandrecreationregion
AT golomidovaes estimatingthedevelopmentofthelatvianestonianrussiantransboundarytourismandrecreationregion
_version_ 1716780941921222656