KRAS(G12C)–AMG 510 interaction dynamics revealed by all-atom molecular dynamics simulations

Abstract The first KRAS(G12C) targeting inhibitor in clinical development, AMG 510, has shown promising antitumor activity in clinical trials. On the molecular level, however, the interaction dynamics of this covalently bound drug–protein complex has been undetermined. Here, we disclose the interact...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tatu Pantsar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2020-07-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68950-y
id doaj-5b1c9467f57d40f7a97ffe6051ad08bb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5b1c9467f57d40f7a97ffe6051ad08bb2021-07-25T11:19:48ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222020-07-011011910.1038/s41598-020-68950-yKRAS(G12C)–AMG 510 interaction dynamics revealed by all-atom molecular dynamics simulationsTatu Pantsar0Department of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Eberhard Karls University TübingenAbstract The first KRAS(G12C) targeting inhibitor in clinical development, AMG 510, has shown promising antitumor activity in clinical trials. On the molecular level, however, the interaction dynamics of this covalently bound drug–protein complex has been undetermined. Here, we disclose the interaction dynamics of the KRAS(G12C)–AMG 510 complex by long timescale all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations (total of 75 μs). Moreover, we investigated the influence of the recently reported post-translational modification (PTM) of KRAS’ N-terminus, removal of initiator methionine (iMet1) with acetylation of Thr2, to this complex. Our results demonstrate that AMG 510 does not entrap KRAS into a single conformation, as one would expect based on the crystal structure, but rather into an ensemble of conformations. AMG 510 binding is extremely stable regardless of highly dynamic interface of KRAS’ switches. Overall, KRAS(G12C)–AMG 510 complex partially mimic the native dynamics of GDP bound KRAS; however, AMG 510 stabilizes the α3-helix region. N-terminally modified KRAS displays similar interaction dynamics with AMG 510 as when Met1 is present, but this PTM appears to stabilize β2–β3-loop. These results provide novel conformational insights on the molecular level to KRAS(G12C)–AMG 510 interactions and dynamics, providing new perspectives to RAS related drug discovery.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68950-y
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tatu Pantsar
spellingShingle Tatu Pantsar
KRAS(G12C)–AMG 510 interaction dynamics revealed by all-atom molecular dynamics simulations
Scientific Reports
author_facet Tatu Pantsar
author_sort Tatu Pantsar
title KRAS(G12C)–AMG 510 interaction dynamics revealed by all-atom molecular dynamics simulations
title_short KRAS(G12C)–AMG 510 interaction dynamics revealed by all-atom molecular dynamics simulations
title_full KRAS(G12C)–AMG 510 interaction dynamics revealed by all-atom molecular dynamics simulations
title_fullStr KRAS(G12C)–AMG 510 interaction dynamics revealed by all-atom molecular dynamics simulations
title_full_unstemmed KRAS(G12C)–AMG 510 interaction dynamics revealed by all-atom molecular dynamics simulations
title_sort kras(g12c)–amg 510 interaction dynamics revealed by all-atom molecular dynamics simulations
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Abstract The first KRAS(G12C) targeting inhibitor in clinical development, AMG 510, has shown promising antitumor activity in clinical trials. On the molecular level, however, the interaction dynamics of this covalently bound drug–protein complex has been undetermined. Here, we disclose the interaction dynamics of the KRAS(G12C)–AMG 510 complex by long timescale all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations (total of 75 μs). Moreover, we investigated the influence of the recently reported post-translational modification (PTM) of KRAS’ N-terminus, removal of initiator methionine (iMet1) with acetylation of Thr2, to this complex. Our results demonstrate that AMG 510 does not entrap KRAS into a single conformation, as one would expect based on the crystal structure, but rather into an ensemble of conformations. AMG 510 binding is extremely stable regardless of highly dynamic interface of KRAS’ switches. Overall, KRAS(G12C)–AMG 510 complex partially mimic the native dynamics of GDP bound KRAS; however, AMG 510 stabilizes the α3-helix region. N-terminally modified KRAS displays similar interaction dynamics with AMG 510 as when Met1 is present, but this PTM appears to stabilize β2–β3-loop. These results provide novel conformational insights on the molecular level to KRAS(G12C)–AMG 510 interactions and dynamics, providing new perspectives to RAS related drug discovery.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68950-y
work_keys_str_mv AT tatupantsar krasg12camg510interactiondynamicsrevealedbyallatommoleculardynamicssimulations
_version_ 1721283296561725440