“Too Smart to be Religious?” Discreet Seeking Amidst Religious Stigma at an Elite College

To advance understandings of how religion manifests in subtle, nuanced ways in secular institutions, we examine student religiosity and spirituality at an elite liberal arts school marked by a strong intellectual collective identity. Using mixed research methods, we examine how the college’s structu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kateri Boucher, Jaime Kucinskas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2016-04-01
Series:Social Inclusion
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/491
id doaj-5b168b7fb1bb4353bfbf67101c2d47b2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5b168b7fb1bb4353bfbf67101c2d47b22020-11-25T02:24:44ZengCogitatioSocial Inclusion2183-28032016-04-0142405110.17645/si.v4i2.491279“Too Smart to be Religious?” Discreet Seeking Amidst Religious Stigma at an Elite CollegeKateri Boucher0Jaime Kucinskas1Department of Sociology, Hamilton College, USADepartment of Sociology, Hamilton College, USATo advance understandings of how religion manifests in subtle, nuanced ways in secular institutions, we examine student religiosity and spirituality at an elite liberal arts school marked by a strong intellectual collective identity. Using mixed research methods, we examine how the college’s structures and dominant culture influence students’ religiosity and spirituality. Despite an institutional commitment to promoting students’ self-exploration and inclusion of social “diversity,” we found both campus structures and mainstream culture deterred open spiritual and religious exploration and identification. The structure of the college and its dominant secular, intellectual culture reinforced: (1) a widespread stigma against religious and spiritual expression, (2) a lack of dialogue about the sacred, (3) discreetness in exploring and adhering to sacred beliefs and practices, and (4) a large degree of religious and spiritual pluralism. Our findings additionally illustrate that early exposure to the campus culture’s critical regard for religion had a long-lasting impact on students’ religiosity. A majority of students kept their religious and spiritual expressions hidden and private; only a marginalized minority of students embraced their expressions publically. To increase students’ comfort with religious and spiritual exploration, we propose that colleges foster intentional peer dialogues early in the college experience. Furthermore, we recommend that campus communities prioritize religious and spiritual literacy and respect.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/491collegediversityhigher educationlived religionreligiosityspirituality
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kateri Boucher
Jaime Kucinskas
spellingShingle Kateri Boucher
Jaime Kucinskas
“Too Smart to be Religious?” Discreet Seeking Amidst Religious Stigma at an Elite College
Social Inclusion
college
diversity
higher education
lived religion
religiosity
spirituality
author_facet Kateri Boucher
Jaime Kucinskas
author_sort Kateri Boucher
title “Too Smart to be Religious?” Discreet Seeking Amidst Religious Stigma at an Elite College
title_short “Too Smart to be Religious?” Discreet Seeking Amidst Religious Stigma at an Elite College
title_full “Too Smart to be Religious?” Discreet Seeking Amidst Religious Stigma at an Elite College
title_fullStr “Too Smart to be Religious?” Discreet Seeking Amidst Religious Stigma at an Elite College
title_full_unstemmed “Too Smart to be Religious?” Discreet Seeking Amidst Religious Stigma at an Elite College
title_sort “too smart to be religious?” discreet seeking amidst religious stigma at an elite college
publisher Cogitatio
series Social Inclusion
issn 2183-2803
publishDate 2016-04-01
description To advance understandings of how religion manifests in subtle, nuanced ways in secular institutions, we examine student religiosity and spirituality at an elite liberal arts school marked by a strong intellectual collective identity. Using mixed research methods, we examine how the college’s structures and dominant culture influence students’ religiosity and spirituality. Despite an institutional commitment to promoting students’ self-exploration and inclusion of social “diversity,” we found both campus structures and mainstream culture deterred open spiritual and religious exploration and identification. The structure of the college and its dominant secular, intellectual culture reinforced: (1) a widespread stigma against religious and spiritual expression, (2) a lack of dialogue about the sacred, (3) discreetness in exploring and adhering to sacred beliefs and practices, and (4) a large degree of religious and spiritual pluralism. Our findings additionally illustrate that early exposure to the campus culture’s critical regard for religion had a long-lasting impact on students’ religiosity. A majority of students kept their religious and spiritual expressions hidden and private; only a marginalized minority of students embraced their expressions publically. To increase students’ comfort with religious and spiritual exploration, we propose that colleges foster intentional peer dialogues early in the college experience. Furthermore, we recommend that campus communities prioritize religious and spiritual literacy and respect.
topic college
diversity
higher education
lived religion
religiosity
spirituality
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/491
work_keys_str_mv AT kateriboucher toosmarttobereligiousdiscreetseekingamidstreligiousstigmaatanelitecollege
AT jaimekucinskas toosmarttobereligiousdiscreetseekingamidstreligiousstigmaatanelitecollege
_version_ 1724853673854500864