Science writing in the real world

The objective of this contribution is to consider guides to technical writing. Since the professional writes what he does and does what he writes, guides to how you execute the one relate to how you perform the other, so this article is about more than just writing. While there is need for idiosyncr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mike Mentis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2014-02-01
Series:Forest Ecosystems
Online Access:http://www.forestecosyst.com/content/1/1/2
id doaj-5b0a0e64fc5b40fcb8fd7ccb8bd9cce3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5b0a0e64fc5b40fcb8fd7ccb8bd9cce32020-11-25T01:01:31ZengSpringerOpenForest Ecosystems2095-63552197-56202014-02-01110.1186/2197-5620-1-2Science writing in the real worldMike Mentis0Business & the environment, Postnet Suite 10102, Private Bag X7005, 3650 Hillcrest, South Africa The objective of this contribution is to consider guides to technical writing. Since the professional writes what he does and does what he writes, guides to how you execute the one relate to how you perform the other, so this article is about more than just writing. While there is need for idiosyncrasy and individualism, there are some rules. Documents must have an explicit purpose stated at the outset. By their nature, documents in the applied sciences and business address real-world problems, but elsewhere activity may be laissez faire for which the cost-effectiveness in yielding innovations is contestable. A hallmark of written science and technology is that every statement is capable of being tested and capable of being shown to be wrong, and that methods yield repeatable results. Caution should be observed in requiring authoritative referencing for every notion, partly because of the unsatisfying infinite regress in searching for ultimate sources, and partly to avoid squashing innovation. It is not only the content of messages that matters, but reliability too. Probability theory must be built into design to assure that strong inference can be drawn from outcomes. Research, business and infrastructure projects must substitute the frequent optimistic ‘everything goes according to plan’ (EGAP) with a more realistic ‘most likely development’ (MLD) and the risks of even that not happening. A cornerstone of science and technology is parsimony. No description, experiment, explanation, hypothesis, idea, instrument, machine, method, model, prediction, statement, technique, test or theory should be more elaborate than necessary to satisfy its purpose. Antifragility – the capacity to survive and benefit from shocks – must be designed into project and organizational structure and function by manipulating such factors as complexity and interdependency to evade failure in a turbulent and unpredictable world. The role of writing is to integrate these issues, and communicate them so that the stakeholders share a vision before, during and after the project. http://www.forestecosyst.com/content/1/1/2
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mike Mentis
spellingShingle Mike Mentis
Science writing in the real world
Forest Ecosystems
author_facet Mike Mentis
author_sort Mike Mentis
title Science writing in the real world
title_short Science writing in the real world
title_full Science writing in the real world
title_fullStr Science writing in the real world
title_full_unstemmed Science writing in the real world
title_sort science writing in the real world
publisher SpringerOpen
series Forest Ecosystems
issn 2095-6355
2197-5620
publishDate 2014-02-01
description The objective of this contribution is to consider guides to technical writing. Since the professional writes what he does and does what he writes, guides to how you execute the one relate to how you perform the other, so this article is about more than just writing. While there is need for idiosyncrasy and individualism, there are some rules. Documents must have an explicit purpose stated at the outset. By their nature, documents in the applied sciences and business address real-world problems, but elsewhere activity may be laissez faire for which the cost-effectiveness in yielding innovations is contestable. A hallmark of written science and technology is that every statement is capable of being tested and capable of being shown to be wrong, and that methods yield repeatable results. Caution should be observed in requiring authoritative referencing for every notion, partly because of the unsatisfying infinite regress in searching for ultimate sources, and partly to avoid squashing innovation. It is not only the content of messages that matters, but reliability too. Probability theory must be built into design to assure that strong inference can be drawn from outcomes. Research, business and infrastructure projects must substitute the frequent optimistic ‘everything goes according to plan’ (EGAP) with a more realistic ‘most likely development’ (MLD) and the risks of even that not happening. A cornerstone of science and technology is parsimony. No description, experiment, explanation, hypothesis, idea, instrument, machine, method, model, prediction, statement, technique, test or theory should be more elaborate than necessary to satisfy its purpose. Antifragility – the capacity to survive and benefit from shocks – must be designed into project and organizational structure and function by manipulating such factors as complexity and interdependency to evade failure in a turbulent and unpredictable world. The role of writing is to integrate these issues, and communicate them so that the stakeholders share a vision before, during and after the project.
url http://www.forestecosyst.com/content/1/1/2
work_keys_str_mv AT mikementis sciencewritingintherealworld
_version_ 1725208874388029440