Reassessing Function Points

Accurate estimation of the size and development effort for software projects requires estimation models which can be used early enough in the development life cycle to be of practical value. Function Point Analysis (FPA) has become possibly the most widely used estimation technique in practice. Howe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G.R. Finnie, G.E. Wittig, J-M. Desharnais
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Australasian Association for Information Systems 1997-05-01
Series:Australasian Journal of Information Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.acs.org.au/index.php/ajis/article/view/357
id doaj-5b0542e33be545a69f8903954569115e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5b0542e33be545a69f8903954569115e2021-08-02T03:04:24ZengAustralasian Association for Information SystemsAustralasian Journal of Information Systems1449-86181449-86181997-05-014210.3127/ajis.v4i2.357312Reassessing Function PointsG.R. FinnieG.E. WittigJ-M. DesharnaisAccurate estimation of the size and development effort for software projects requires estimation models which can be used early enough in the development life cycle to be of practical value. Function Point Analysis (FPA) has become possibly the most widely used estimation technique in practice. However the technique was developed in the data processing environment of the 1970's and, despite undergoing considerable reassessment and formalisation, still attracts criticism for the weighting scoring it employs and for the way in which the function point score is adapted for specific system characteristics. This paper reviews the validity of the weighting scheme and the value of adjusting for system characteristics by studying their effect in a sample of 299 software developments. In general the value adjustment scheme does not appear to cater for differences in productivity. The weighting scheme used to adjust system components in terms of being simple, average or complex also appears suspect and should be redesigned to provide a more realistic estimate of system functionality.http://journal.acs.org.au/index.php/ajis/article/view/357project estimationfunction point analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author G.R. Finnie
G.E. Wittig
J-M. Desharnais
spellingShingle G.R. Finnie
G.E. Wittig
J-M. Desharnais
Reassessing Function Points
Australasian Journal of Information Systems
project estimation
function point analysis
author_facet G.R. Finnie
G.E. Wittig
J-M. Desharnais
author_sort G.R. Finnie
title Reassessing Function Points
title_short Reassessing Function Points
title_full Reassessing Function Points
title_fullStr Reassessing Function Points
title_full_unstemmed Reassessing Function Points
title_sort reassessing function points
publisher Australasian Association for Information Systems
series Australasian Journal of Information Systems
issn 1449-8618
1449-8618
publishDate 1997-05-01
description Accurate estimation of the size and development effort for software projects requires estimation models which can be used early enough in the development life cycle to be of practical value. Function Point Analysis (FPA) has become possibly the most widely used estimation technique in practice. However the technique was developed in the data processing environment of the 1970's and, despite undergoing considerable reassessment and formalisation, still attracts criticism for the weighting scoring it employs and for the way in which the function point score is adapted for specific system characteristics. This paper reviews the validity of the weighting scheme and the value of adjusting for system characteristics by studying their effect in a sample of 299 software developments. In general the value adjustment scheme does not appear to cater for differences in productivity. The weighting scheme used to adjust system components in terms of being simple, average or complex also appears suspect and should be redesigned to provide a more realistic estimate of system functionality.
topic project estimation
function point analysis
url http://journal.acs.org.au/index.php/ajis/article/view/357
work_keys_str_mv AT grfinnie reassessingfunctionpoints
AT gewittig reassessingfunctionpoints
AT jmdesharnais reassessingfunctionpoints
_version_ 1721243559331364864