Can we resolve the taxonomic bias in spider venom research?

The rate of discovery of new spider species greatly exceeds the rate of spider venom characterisation, leading to an increasing number of species with unstudied venoms. However, recent advances in proteomics and genomics that enable the study of venoms from smaller species has expanded the accessibl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Volker Herzig, Glenn F. King, Eivind A.B. Undheim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-01-01
Series:Toxicon: X
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590171018300055
id doaj-5afe8c6ef9f646099de62f236e9650aa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5afe8c6ef9f646099de62f236e9650aa2020-11-25T02:26:12ZengElsevierToxicon: X2590-17102019-01-011Can we resolve the taxonomic bias in spider venom research?Volker Herzig0Glenn F. King1Eivind A.B. Undheim2Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; Corresponding author.Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, AustraliaCentre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; Corresponding author.The rate of discovery of new spider species greatly exceeds the rate of spider venom characterisation, leading to an increasing number of species with unstudied venoms. However, recent advances in proteomics and genomics that enable the study of venoms from smaller species has expanded the accessible taxonomic range. Thus, although the number of unstudied spider venoms is likely to further increase, future research should focus on the characterisation of venoms and toxins from previously unstudied spider families. Keywords: Spider, Venom, Peptide, Diversity, Taxonomic, Transcriptomics, Proteomicshttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590171018300055
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Volker Herzig
Glenn F. King
Eivind A.B. Undheim
spellingShingle Volker Herzig
Glenn F. King
Eivind A.B. Undheim
Can we resolve the taxonomic bias in spider venom research?
Toxicon: X
author_facet Volker Herzig
Glenn F. King
Eivind A.B. Undheim
author_sort Volker Herzig
title Can we resolve the taxonomic bias in spider venom research?
title_short Can we resolve the taxonomic bias in spider venom research?
title_full Can we resolve the taxonomic bias in spider venom research?
title_fullStr Can we resolve the taxonomic bias in spider venom research?
title_full_unstemmed Can we resolve the taxonomic bias in spider venom research?
title_sort can we resolve the taxonomic bias in spider venom research?
publisher Elsevier
series Toxicon: X
issn 2590-1710
publishDate 2019-01-01
description The rate of discovery of new spider species greatly exceeds the rate of spider venom characterisation, leading to an increasing number of species with unstudied venoms. However, recent advances in proteomics and genomics that enable the study of venoms from smaller species has expanded the accessible taxonomic range. Thus, although the number of unstudied spider venoms is likely to further increase, future research should focus on the characterisation of venoms and toxins from previously unstudied spider families. Keywords: Spider, Venom, Peptide, Diversity, Taxonomic, Transcriptomics, Proteomics
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590171018300055
work_keys_str_mv AT volkerherzig canweresolvethetaxonomicbiasinspidervenomresearch
AT glennfking canweresolvethetaxonomicbiasinspidervenomresearch
AT eivindabundheim canweresolvethetaxonomicbiasinspidervenomresearch
_version_ 1724848601801162752