Review of Quantitative Methods Used in Chinese Educational Research, 1978–2018

Purpose: This article reviews the development of quantitative methods in educational research in China since 1978. Design/Approach/Methods: For this summary and literature review, we used data from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), relevant books, and research output from the Gradu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Changjun Yue, Xiaowen Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-12-01
Series:ECNU Review of Education
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531119886692
id doaj-5ae427b0325f4082b0399502e29b9e40
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5ae427b0325f4082b0399502e29b9e402020-11-25T03:09:32ZengSAGE PublishingECNU Review of Education2096-53112632-17422019-12-01210.1177/2096531119886692Review of Quantitative Methods Used in Chinese Educational Research, 1978–2018Changjun YueXiaowen XuPurpose: This article reviews the development of quantitative methods in educational research in China since 1978. Design/Approach/Methods: For this summary and literature review, we used data from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), relevant books, and research output from the Graduate School of Education, Peking University. Findings: We divided the development of quantitative methods in Chinese educational research into four stages: the Startup Stage (1978–1988), the Gradual Application Stage (1989–1998), the Growth Spurt Stage (1999–2008), and the Integrated and Diverse Development Stage (2009–2018). Overall, the development of quantitative methods in Chinese educational research shows sustained innovation in numerous aspects, including research methods, data sources, utilization of advancements in computing technology and statistical software, and research topics. However, despite the relatively advanced state of quantitative methods, education measurement and evaluation require further attention. The questionnaire and experimental research data currently available indicate the need to improve the mining and utilization of big data. Moreover, while Chinese educational researchers have demonstrated their proficiency in using quantitative research methods, improvements remain to be made with respect to collaboration and sharing. Originality/Value: This article is the first to analyze systemically the development of quantitative methods in Chinese educational research. It provides an original summary of the development and characteristics of quantitative methods in educational research in China.https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531119886692
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Changjun Yue
Xiaowen Xu
spellingShingle Changjun Yue
Xiaowen Xu
Review of Quantitative Methods Used in Chinese Educational Research, 1978–2018
ECNU Review of Education
author_facet Changjun Yue
Xiaowen Xu
author_sort Changjun Yue
title Review of Quantitative Methods Used in Chinese Educational Research, 1978–2018
title_short Review of Quantitative Methods Used in Chinese Educational Research, 1978–2018
title_full Review of Quantitative Methods Used in Chinese Educational Research, 1978–2018
title_fullStr Review of Quantitative Methods Used in Chinese Educational Research, 1978–2018
title_full_unstemmed Review of Quantitative Methods Used in Chinese Educational Research, 1978–2018
title_sort review of quantitative methods used in chinese educational research, 1978–2018
publisher SAGE Publishing
series ECNU Review of Education
issn 2096-5311
2632-1742
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Purpose: This article reviews the development of quantitative methods in educational research in China since 1978. Design/Approach/Methods: For this summary and literature review, we used data from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), relevant books, and research output from the Graduate School of Education, Peking University. Findings: We divided the development of quantitative methods in Chinese educational research into four stages: the Startup Stage (1978–1988), the Gradual Application Stage (1989–1998), the Growth Spurt Stage (1999–2008), and the Integrated and Diverse Development Stage (2009–2018). Overall, the development of quantitative methods in Chinese educational research shows sustained innovation in numerous aspects, including research methods, data sources, utilization of advancements in computing technology and statistical software, and research topics. However, despite the relatively advanced state of quantitative methods, education measurement and evaluation require further attention. The questionnaire and experimental research data currently available indicate the need to improve the mining and utilization of big data. Moreover, while Chinese educational researchers have demonstrated their proficiency in using quantitative research methods, improvements remain to be made with respect to collaboration and sharing. Originality/Value: This article is the first to analyze systemically the development of quantitative methods in Chinese educational research. It provides an original summary of the development and characteristics of quantitative methods in educational research in China.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531119886692
work_keys_str_mv AT changjunyue reviewofquantitativemethodsusedinchineseeducationalresearch19782018
AT xiaowenxu reviewofquantitativemethodsusedinchineseeducationalresearch19782018
_version_ 1724662088158150656