Greenface – Exploring green skin in contemporary Hollywood cinema

In the natural world human skin color has a limited range of pigments varying from dark brown to light pink. Still, even this small spectrum has been enough to fuel countless histories of prejudice where skin color has provided the justification for hate and violence. In the Western world where whit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brady Hammond
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Amsterdam University Press 2013-01-01
Series:NECSUS : European journal of media studies
Online Access:https://www.necsus-ejms.org/test/greenface-exploring-green-skin-in-contemporary-hollywood-cinema/
id doaj-5ae3a5ee7cf74f75abe20be0d96e63b2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5ae3a5ee7cf74f75abe20be0d96e63b22020-11-25T03:50:46ZengAmsterdam University PressNECSUS : European journal of media studies2213-02172013-01-012121323210.5117/NECSUS2013.1.HAMMGreenface – Exploring green skin in contemporary Hollywood cinemaBrady HammondIn the natural world human skin color has a limited range of pigments varying from dark brown to light pink. Still, even this small spectrum has been enough to fuel countless histories of prejudice where skin color has provided the justification for hate and violence. In the Western world where whiteness is presented as the norm this has often manifested itself as prejudice against those who are not white. However, given the primacy of whiteness in certain cultures authors such as Richard Dyer have argued that whiteness itself is invisible and is thus itself not perceived as a color. This invisibility has led others to develop further theories regarding color in visual media. For instance, in CHROMOPHOBIA David Batchelor states that ‘color has been the object of extreme prejudice in Western culture’. This prejudice, he argues, manifests itself by either dismissing color outright as ‘superficial’ or by denigrating it and ‘[making it] out to be the property of some “foreign” body – usually the feminine, the oriental, the primitive, the infantile, the vulgar, the queer or the pathological’. In this formulation white is safe and color is dangerous. Throughout color cinema in the 20th century there have been numerous instances which illustrate this point.https://www.necsus-ejms.org/test/greenface-exploring-green-skin-in-contemporary-hollywood-cinema/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brady Hammond
spellingShingle Brady Hammond
Greenface – Exploring green skin in contemporary Hollywood cinema
NECSUS : European journal of media studies
author_facet Brady Hammond
author_sort Brady Hammond
title Greenface – Exploring green skin in contemporary Hollywood cinema
title_short Greenface – Exploring green skin in contemporary Hollywood cinema
title_full Greenface – Exploring green skin in contemporary Hollywood cinema
title_fullStr Greenface – Exploring green skin in contemporary Hollywood cinema
title_full_unstemmed Greenface – Exploring green skin in contemporary Hollywood cinema
title_sort greenface – exploring green skin in contemporary hollywood cinema
publisher Amsterdam University Press
series NECSUS : European journal of media studies
issn 2213-0217
publishDate 2013-01-01
description In the natural world human skin color has a limited range of pigments varying from dark brown to light pink. Still, even this small spectrum has been enough to fuel countless histories of prejudice where skin color has provided the justification for hate and violence. In the Western world where whiteness is presented as the norm this has often manifested itself as prejudice against those who are not white. However, given the primacy of whiteness in certain cultures authors such as Richard Dyer have argued that whiteness itself is invisible and is thus itself not perceived as a color. This invisibility has led others to develop further theories regarding color in visual media. For instance, in CHROMOPHOBIA David Batchelor states that ‘color has been the object of extreme prejudice in Western culture’. This prejudice, he argues, manifests itself by either dismissing color outright as ‘superficial’ or by denigrating it and ‘[making it] out to be the property of some “foreign” body – usually the feminine, the oriental, the primitive, the infantile, the vulgar, the queer or the pathological’. In this formulation white is safe and color is dangerous. Throughout color cinema in the 20th century there have been numerous instances which illustrate this point.
url https://www.necsus-ejms.org/test/greenface-exploring-green-skin-in-contemporary-hollywood-cinema/
work_keys_str_mv AT bradyhammond greenfaceexploringgreenskinincontemporaryhollywoodcinema
_version_ 1724490691130687488