Putting Humpty Together Again: How Reputation Regulation Fails the Charitable Sector

Investigations of how Oxfam Great Britain (GB) managed its safeguarding systems and handled revelations of sexual exploitation by its staff highlighted a variety of internal governance and culture issues, and a lack of transparency as it sought to protect its reputation. The current models of reputa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Phillips Susan D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2019-11-01
Series:Nonprofit Policy Forum
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/npf.2019.10.issue-4/npf-2019-0032/npf-2019-0032.xml?format=INT
id doaj-5acf4827c75642f896941276f3ef6d1f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5acf4827c75642f896941276f3ef6d1f2021-09-02T09:13:02ZengDe GruyterNonprofit Policy Forum2154-33482019-11-0110410.1515/npf-2019-0032npf-2019-0032Putting Humpty Together Again: How Reputation Regulation Fails the Charitable SectorPhillips Susan D.0School of Public Policy and Administratio, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S5B6, CanadaInvestigations of how Oxfam Great Britain (GB) managed its safeguarding systems and handled revelations of sexual exploitation by its staff highlighted a variety of internal governance and culture issues, and a lack of transparency as it sought to protect its reputation. The current models of reputation management do not fully explain its actions, however. This article argues that five systemic factors in the environment in which nonprofits operate create undue pressures for protection of reputations and contribute to poor assessment of risks, inadequate accountability systems and limited transparency. These factors include: a stress on success and related competition for market share and pressures for growth; expectations of low overheads; challenges of governance and risk management; lack of public awareness; and regulatory gaps. Drawing on media coverage and the commissions of inquiry, the analysis shows how all of these contextual factors were at play in the Oxfam case, and suggests potential reforms.http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/npf.2019.10.issue-4/npf-2019-0032/npf-2019-0032.xml?format=INTreputation managementoxfam scandalnonprofit policycharity regulationself-regulation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Phillips Susan D.
spellingShingle Phillips Susan D.
Putting Humpty Together Again: How Reputation Regulation Fails the Charitable Sector
Nonprofit Policy Forum
reputation management
oxfam scandal
nonprofit policy
charity regulation
self-regulation
author_facet Phillips Susan D.
author_sort Phillips Susan D.
title Putting Humpty Together Again: How Reputation Regulation Fails the Charitable Sector
title_short Putting Humpty Together Again: How Reputation Regulation Fails the Charitable Sector
title_full Putting Humpty Together Again: How Reputation Regulation Fails the Charitable Sector
title_fullStr Putting Humpty Together Again: How Reputation Regulation Fails the Charitable Sector
title_full_unstemmed Putting Humpty Together Again: How Reputation Regulation Fails the Charitable Sector
title_sort putting humpty together again: how reputation regulation fails the charitable sector
publisher De Gruyter
series Nonprofit Policy Forum
issn 2154-3348
publishDate 2019-11-01
description Investigations of how Oxfam Great Britain (GB) managed its safeguarding systems and handled revelations of sexual exploitation by its staff highlighted a variety of internal governance and culture issues, and a lack of transparency as it sought to protect its reputation. The current models of reputation management do not fully explain its actions, however. This article argues that five systemic factors in the environment in which nonprofits operate create undue pressures for protection of reputations and contribute to poor assessment of risks, inadequate accountability systems and limited transparency. These factors include: a stress on success and related competition for market share and pressures for growth; expectations of low overheads; challenges of governance and risk management; lack of public awareness; and regulatory gaps. Drawing on media coverage and the commissions of inquiry, the analysis shows how all of these contextual factors were at play in the Oxfam case, and suggests potential reforms.
topic reputation management
oxfam scandal
nonprofit policy
charity regulation
self-regulation
url http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/npf.2019.10.issue-4/npf-2019-0032/npf-2019-0032.xml?format=INT
work_keys_str_mv AT phillipssusand puttinghumptytogetheragainhowreputationregulationfailsthecharitablesector
_version_ 1721177321935732736