Blind User Experiences of US Academic Libraries can be Improved by More Proactive Reference Service Delivery

A Review of: Mulliken, A. (2017). There is nothing inherently mysterious about assistive technology: A qualitative study about blind user experiences in US academic libraries. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 57(2), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.57.2.6528 Abstract Objectiv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alisa Howlett
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Alberta 2019-06-01
Series:Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
Online Access:https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/29565
id doaj-5ac4af9a25224e22944978928dcebd97
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5ac4af9a25224e22944978928dcebd972020-11-24T21:24:26ZengUniversity of AlbertaEvidence Based Library and Information Practice1715-720X2019-06-0114210.18438/eblip2956529565Blind User Experiences of US Academic Libraries can be Improved by More Proactive Reference Service DeliveryAlisa Howlett0University of Southern Queensland A Review of: Mulliken, A. (2017). There is nothing inherently mysterious about assistive technology: A qualitative study about blind user experiences in US academic libraries. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 57(2), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.57.2.6528 Abstract Objective – To explore blind users’ experiences with academic libraries. Design – Qualitative questionnaire. Setting – Academic libraries within the United States of America. Subjects – 18 individuals who are legally blind, have experience relying on a screen reader to access the internet, and have used an academic library either online or in person within the previous two years. Methods – An open-ended questionnaire was administered via telephone interview. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using an inductive approach to identify themes using Hill et al.’s (2005) approach. Main Results – The author found seven themes in the interview data: experiences working with reference librarians in person, difficulty with library websites, screen reader use during reference transactions, preferences for independence, using chat, interactions with disability officers, and challenges of working with citation styles.  Conclusion – The study concluded that academic libraries and librarians should be more proactive when approaching reference services for blind users. The author offered suggestions for practice about how to improve blind user experiences of academic libraries. https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/29565
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alisa Howlett
spellingShingle Alisa Howlett
Blind User Experiences of US Academic Libraries can be Improved by More Proactive Reference Service Delivery
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
author_facet Alisa Howlett
author_sort Alisa Howlett
title Blind User Experiences of US Academic Libraries can be Improved by More Proactive Reference Service Delivery
title_short Blind User Experiences of US Academic Libraries can be Improved by More Proactive Reference Service Delivery
title_full Blind User Experiences of US Academic Libraries can be Improved by More Proactive Reference Service Delivery
title_fullStr Blind User Experiences of US Academic Libraries can be Improved by More Proactive Reference Service Delivery
title_full_unstemmed Blind User Experiences of US Academic Libraries can be Improved by More Proactive Reference Service Delivery
title_sort blind user experiences of us academic libraries can be improved by more proactive reference service delivery
publisher University of Alberta
series Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
issn 1715-720X
publishDate 2019-06-01
description A Review of: Mulliken, A. (2017). There is nothing inherently mysterious about assistive technology: A qualitative study about blind user experiences in US academic libraries. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 57(2), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.57.2.6528 Abstract Objective – To explore blind users’ experiences with academic libraries. Design – Qualitative questionnaire. Setting – Academic libraries within the United States of America. Subjects – 18 individuals who are legally blind, have experience relying on a screen reader to access the internet, and have used an academic library either online or in person within the previous two years. Methods – An open-ended questionnaire was administered via telephone interview. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using an inductive approach to identify themes using Hill et al.’s (2005) approach. Main Results – The author found seven themes in the interview data: experiences working with reference librarians in person, difficulty with library websites, screen reader use during reference transactions, preferences for independence, using chat, interactions with disability officers, and challenges of working with citation styles.  Conclusion – The study concluded that academic libraries and librarians should be more proactive when approaching reference services for blind users. The author offered suggestions for practice about how to improve blind user experiences of academic libraries.
url https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/29565
work_keys_str_mv AT alisahowlett blinduserexperiencesofusacademiclibrariescanbeimprovedbymoreproactivereferenceservicedelivery
_version_ 1725988288364281856