New Evidence of the Marginal Predictive Content of Small and Large Jumps in the Cross-Section
We investigate the marginal predictive content of small versus large jump variation, when forecasting one-week-ahead cross-sectional equity returns, building on Bollerslev et al. (2020). We find that sorting on signed small jump variation leads to greater value-weighted return differentials between...
Main Authors: | Bo Yu, Bruce Mizrach, Norman R. Swanson |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-05-01
|
Series: | Econometrics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/8/2/19 |
Similar Items
-
A reverse engineered pitch on Cremers et al. (2015), “Aggregate jump and volatility risk in the cross-section of stock returns”
by: Qingxia (Jenny) Wang
Published: (2018-03-01) -
Time-varying risk aversion and realized gold volatility
by: Demirer, R., et al.
Published: (2019) -
The Impact of Jumps and Leverage in Forecasting the Co-Volatility of Oil and Gold Futures
by: Manabu Asai, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01) -
Do Jumps Matter in Both Equity Market Returns and Integrated Volatility: A Comparison of Asian Developed and Emerging Markets
by: Hassan Zada, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01) -
Volatility Forecasting: Downside Risk, Jumps and Leverage Effect
by: Francesco Audrino, et al.
Published: (2016-02-01)