Effectiveness of smoking cessation therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Smoking remains the leading preventable cause of premature deaths. Several pharmacological interventions now exist to aid smokers in cessation. These include Nicotine Replacement Therapy [NRT], bupropion, and varenicline. We aimed to...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2006-12-01
|
Series: | BMC Public Health |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/6/300 |
id |
doaj-5abced153dfb45d696d2087022c9961b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5abced153dfb45d696d2087022c9961b2020-11-25T00:38:53ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582006-12-016130010.1186/1471-2458-6-300Effectiveness of smoking cessation therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysisDimoulas PopeyWilson KumananWu PingMills Edward J<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Smoking remains the leading preventable cause of premature deaths. Several pharmacological interventions now exist to aid smokers in cessation. These include Nicotine Replacement Therapy [NRT], bupropion, and varenicline. We aimed to assess their relative efficacy in smoking cessation by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We searched 10 electronic medical databases (inception to Sept. 2006) and bibliographies of published reviews. We selected randomized controlled trials [RCTs] evaluating interventions for smoking cessation at 1 year, through chemical confirmation. Our primary endpoint was smoking cessation at 1 year. Secondary endpoints included short-term smoking cessation (~3 months) and adverse events. We conducted random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression. We compared treatment effects across interventions using head-to-head trials and when these did not exist, we calculated indirect comparisons.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We identified 70 trials of NRT versus control at 1 year, Odds Ratio [OR] 1.71, 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 1.55–1.88, P =< 0.0001). This was consistent when examining all placebo-controlled trials (49 RCTs, OR 1.78, 95% CI, 1.60–1.99), NRT gum (OR 1.60, 95% CI, 1.37–1.86) or patch (OR 1.63, 95% CI, 1.41–1.89). NRT also reduced smoking at 3 months (OR 1.98, 95% CI, 1.77–2.21). Bupropion trials were superior to controls at 1 year (12 RCTs, OR1.56, 95% CI, 1.10–2.21, P = 0.01) and at 3 months (OR 2.13, 95% CI, 1.72–2.64). Two RCTs evaluated the superiority of bupropion versus NRT at 1 year (OR 1.14, 95% CI, 0.20–6.42).</p> <p>Varenicline was superior to placebo at 1 year (4 RCTs, OR 2.96, 95% CI, 2.12–4.12, P =< 0.0001) and also at approximately 3 months (OR 3.75, 95% CI, 2.65–5.30). Three RCTs evaluated the effectiveness of varenicline versus bupropion at 1 year (OR 1.58, 95% CI, 1.22–2.05) and at approximately 3 months (OR 1.61, 95% CI, 1.16–2.21). Using indirect comparisons, varenicline was superior to NRT when compared to placebo controls (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.17–2.36, P = 0.004) or to all controls at 1 year (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.22–2.45, P = 0.001). This was also the case for 3-month data. Adverse events were not systematically different across studies.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>NRT, bupropion and varenicline all provide therapeutic effects in assisting with smoking cessation. Direct and indirect comparisons identify a hierarchy of effectiveness.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/6/300 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dimoulas Popey Wilson Kumanan Wu Ping Mills Edward J |
spellingShingle |
Dimoulas Popey Wilson Kumanan Wu Ping Mills Edward J Effectiveness of smoking cessation therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis BMC Public Health |
author_facet |
Dimoulas Popey Wilson Kumanan Wu Ping Mills Edward J |
author_sort |
Dimoulas Popey |
title |
Effectiveness of smoking cessation therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short |
Effectiveness of smoking cessation therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Effectiveness of smoking cessation therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Effectiveness of smoking cessation therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effectiveness of smoking cessation therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
effectiveness of smoking cessation therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Public Health |
issn |
1471-2458 |
publishDate |
2006-12-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Smoking remains the leading preventable cause of premature deaths. Several pharmacological interventions now exist to aid smokers in cessation. These include Nicotine Replacement Therapy [NRT], bupropion, and varenicline. We aimed to assess their relative efficacy in smoking cessation by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We searched 10 electronic medical databases (inception to Sept. 2006) and bibliographies of published reviews. We selected randomized controlled trials [RCTs] evaluating interventions for smoking cessation at 1 year, through chemical confirmation. Our primary endpoint was smoking cessation at 1 year. Secondary endpoints included short-term smoking cessation (~3 months) and adverse events. We conducted random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression. We compared treatment effects across interventions using head-to-head trials and when these did not exist, we calculated indirect comparisons.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We identified 70 trials of NRT versus control at 1 year, Odds Ratio [OR] 1.71, 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 1.55–1.88, P =< 0.0001). This was consistent when examining all placebo-controlled trials (49 RCTs, OR 1.78, 95% CI, 1.60–1.99), NRT gum (OR 1.60, 95% CI, 1.37–1.86) or patch (OR 1.63, 95% CI, 1.41–1.89). NRT also reduced smoking at 3 months (OR 1.98, 95% CI, 1.77–2.21). Bupropion trials were superior to controls at 1 year (12 RCTs, OR1.56, 95% CI, 1.10–2.21, P = 0.01) and at 3 months (OR 2.13, 95% CI, 1.72–2.64). Two RCTs evaluated the superiority of bupropion versus NRT at 1 year (OR 1.14, 95% CI, 0.20–6.42).</p> <p>Varenicline was superior to placebo at 1 year (4 RCTs, OR 2.96, 95% CI, 2.12–4.12, P =< 0.0001) and also at approximately 3 months (OR 3.75, 95% CI, 2.65–5.30). Three RCTs evaluated the effectiveness of varenicline versus bupropion at 1 year (OR 1.58, 95% CI, 1.22–2.05) and at approximately 3 months (OR 1.61, 95% CI, 1.16–2.21). Using indirect comparisons, varenicline was superior to NRT when compared to placebo controls (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.17–2.36, P = 0.004) or to all controls at 1 year (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.22–2.45, P = 0.001). This was also the case for 3-month data. Adverse events were not systematically different across studies.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>NRT, bupropion and varenicline all provide therapeutic effects in assisting with smoking cessation. Direct and indirect comparisons identify a hierarchy of effectiveness.</p> |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/6/300 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dimoulaspopey effectivenessofsmokingcessationtherapiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wilsonkumanan effectivenessofsmokingcessationtherapiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wuping effectivenessofsmokingcessationtherapiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT millsedwardj effectivenessofsmokingcessationtherapiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |
_version_ |
1725295900377481216 |