Why Do Drivers Use Mobile Phones While Driving? The Contribution of Compensatory Beliefs.

The current study is the first to investigate the contribution of compensatory beliefs (i.e., the belief that the negative effects of an unsafe behavior can be "neutralized" by engaging in another safe behavior; e.g., "I can use a mobile phone now because I will slow down ") on d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ronggang Zhou, Mengli Yu, Xinyi Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4975505?pdf=render
id doaj-5ab37e198859435aa04b3dd9c46172cd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5ab37e198859435aa04b3dd9c46172cd2020-11-25T00:08:37ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01118e016028810.1371/journal.pone.0160288Why Do Drivers Use Mobile Phones While Driving? The Contribution of Compensatory Beliefs.Ronggang ZhouMengli YuXinyi WangThe current study is the first to investigate the contribution of compensatory beliefs (i.e., the belief that the negative effects of an unsafe behavior can be "neutralized" by engaging in another safe behavior; e.g., "I can use a mobile phone now because I will slow down ") on drivers' mobile phone use while driving. The effects of drivers' personal characteristics on compensatory beliefs, mobile phone use and self-regulatory behaviors were also examined. A series of questions were administered to drivers, which included (1) personal measures, (2) scales that measured compensatory beliefs generally in substance use and with regard to driving safety, and (3) questions to measure drivers' previous primary mobile phone usage and corresponding self-regulatory actions. Overall, drivers reported a low likelihood of compensatory beliefs, prior mobile phone use, and a strong frequency of self-regulatory behaviors. Respondents who had a higher tendency toward compensatory beliefs reported more incidents or crash involvement caused by making or answering calls and sending or reading messages. The findings provide strong support for the contribution of compensatory beliefs in predicting mobile phone usage in the context of driving. Compensatory beliefs can explain 41% and 43% of the variance in the active activities of making calls and texting/sending messages compared with 18% and 31% of the variance in the passive activities of answering calls and reading messages. Among the regression models for predicting self-regulatory behaviors at the tactical or operational level, compensatory beliefs emerge as significant predictors only in predicting shorter conversations while on a call. The findings and limitations of the current study are discussed.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4975505?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ronggang Zhou
Mengli Yu
Xinyi Wang
spellingShingle Ronggang Zhou
Mengli Yu
Xinyi Wang
Why Do Drivers Use Mobile Phones While Driving? The Contribution of Compensatory Beliefs.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ronggang Zhou
Mengli Yu
Xinyi Wang
author_sort Ronggang Zhou
title Why Do Drivers Use Mobile Phones While Driving? The Contribution of Compensatory Beliefs.
title_short Why Do Drivers Use Mobile Phones While Driving? The Contribution of Compensatory Beliefs.
title_full Why Do Drivers Use Mobile Phones While Driving? The Contribution of Compensatory Beliefs.
title_fullStr Why Do Drivers Use Mobile Phones While Driving? The Contribution of Compensatory Beliefs.
title_full_unstemmed Why Do Drivers Use Mobile Phones While Driving? The Contribution of Compensatory Beliefs.
title_sort why do drivers use mobile phones while driving? the contribution of compensatory beliefs.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description The current study is the first to investigate the contribution of compensatory beliefs (i.e., the belief that the negative effects of an unsafe behavior can be "neutralized" by engaging in another safe behavior; e.g., "I can use a mobile phone now because I will slow down ") on drivers' mobile phone use while driving. The effects of drivers' personal characteristics on compensatory beliefs, mobile phone use and self-regulatory behaviors were also examined. A series of questions were administered to drivers, which included (1) personal measures, (2) scales that measured compensatory beliefs generally in substance use and with regard to driving safety, and (3) questions to measure drivers' previous primary mobile phone usage and corresponding self-regulatory actions. Overall, drivers reported a low likelihood of compensatory beliefs, prior mobile phone use, and a strong frequency of self-regulatory behaviors. Respondents who had a higher tendency toward compensatory beliefs reported more incidents or crash involvement caused by making or answering calls and sending or reading messages. The findings provide strong support for the contribution of compensatory beliefs in predicting mobile phone usage in the context of driving. Compensatory beliefs can explain 41% and 43% of the variance in the active activities of making calls and texting/sending messages compared with 18% and 31% of the variance in the passive activities of answering calls and reading messages. Among the regression models for predicting self-regulatory behaviors at the tactical or operational level, compensatory beliefs emerge as significant predictors only in predicting shorter conversations while on a call. The findings and limitations of the current study are discussed.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4975505?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT ronggangzhou whydodriversusemobilephoneswhiledrivingthecontributionofcompensatorybeliefs
AT mengliyu whydodriversusemobilephoneswhiledrivingthecontributionofcompensatorybeliefs
AT xinyiwang whydodriversusemobilephoneswhiledrivingthecontributionofcompensatorybeliefs
_version_ 1725415371513528320