Approaches to Foster Transfer of Formal Principles: Which Route to Take?

Enabling learners to transfer knowledge about formal principles to new problems is a major aim of science and mathematics education, which, however, is notoriously difficult to reach. Previous research advocates different approaches of how to introduce principles to foster the transfer of knowledge...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lennart Schalk, Henrik Saalbach, Elsbeth Stern
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4752471?pdf=render
id doaj-5ab378b59721426d94e8ff07225bddb3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5ab378b59721426d94e8ff07225bddb32020-11-24T21:39:32ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01112e014878710.1371/journal.pone.0148787Approaches to Foster Transfer of Formal Principles: Which Route to Take?Lennart SchalkHenrik SaalbachElsbeth SternEnabling learners to transfer knowledge about formal principles to new problems is a major aim of science and mathematics education, which, however, is notoriously difficult to reach. Previous research advocates different approaches of how to introduce principles to foster the transfer of knowledge about formal principles. One approach suggests teaching a generic formalism of the principles. Another approach suggests presenting (at least) two concrete cases instantiating the principle. A third approach suggests presenting a generic formalism accompanied by a case. As yet, though, empirical results regarding the transfer potential of these approaches are mixed and difficult to integrate as the three approaches have rarely been tested competitively. Furthermore, the approaches have been evaluated in relation to different control conditions, and they have been assessed using varying transfer measures. In the present experiment, we introduced undergraduates to the formal principles of propositional logic with the aim to systematically compare the transfer potential of the different approaches in relation to each other and to a common control condition by using various learning and transfer tasks. Results indicate that all approaches supported successful learning and transfer of the principles, but also caused systematic differences in the magnitude of transfer. Results indicate that the combination of a generic formalism with a case was surprisingly unsuccessful while learners who compared two cases outperformed the control condition. We discuss how the simultaneous assessment of the different approaches allows to more precisely capture the underlying learning mechanisms and to advance theory on how these mechanisms contribute to transfer performance.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4752471?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lennart Schalk
Henrik Saalbach
Elsbeth Stern
spellingShingle Lennart Schalk
Henrik Saalbach
Elsbeth Stern
Approaches to Foster Transfer of Formal Principles: Which Route to Take?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Lennart Schalk
Henrik Saalbach
Elsbeth Stern
author_sort Lennart Schalk
title Approaches to Foster Transfer of Formal Principles: Which Route to Take?
title_short Approaches to Foster Transfer of Formal Principles: Which Route to Take?
title_full Approaches to Foster Transfer of Formal Principles: Which Route to Take?
title_fullStr Approaches to Foster Transfer of Formal Principles: Which Route to Take?
title_full_unstemmed Approaches to Foster Transfer of Formal Principles: Which Route to Take?
title_sort approaches to foster transfer of formal principles: which route to take?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Enabling learners to transfer knowledge about formal principles to new problems is a major aim of science and mathematics education, which, however, is notoriously difficult to reach. Previous research advocates different approaches of how to introduce principles to foster the transfer of knowledge about formal principles. One approach suggests teaching a generic formalism of the principles. Another approach suggests presenting (at least) two concrete cases instantiating the principle. A third approach suggests presenting a generic formalism accompanied by a case. As yet, though, empirical results regarding the transfer potential of these approaches are mixed and difficult to integrate as the three approaches have rarely been tested competitively. Furthermore, the approaches have been evaluated in relation to different control conditions, and they have been assessed using varying transfer measures. In the present experiment, we introduced undergraduates to the formal principles of propositional logic with the aim to systematically compare the transfer potential of the different approaches in relation to each other and to a common control condition by using various learning and transfer tasks. Results indicate that all approaches supported successful learning and transfer of the principles, but also caused systematic differences in the magnitude of transfer. Results indicate that the combination of a generic formalism with a case was surprisingly unsuccessful while learners who compared two cases outperformed the control condition. We discuss how the simultaneous assessment of the different approaches allows to more precisely capture the underlying learning mechanisms and to advance theory on how these mechanisms contribute to transfer performance.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4752471?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT lennartschalk approachestofostertransferofformalprincipleswhichroutetotake
AT henriksaalbach approachestofostertransferofformalprincipleswhichroutetotake
AT elsbethstern approachestofostertransferofformalprincipleswhichroutetotake
_version_ 1725930715292368896