Communication practices in asylum seekers reception centres: from information precarity to voluntary return

This article focuses on the complex communication constructed between the Belgian Federal Agency for the Reception of Asylum Seekers (Fedasil) and asylum seekers: what do they say to asylum seekers? Why and how? Beyond the message, it is the relation of communication (Wolton, 2018) between reception...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amandine VAN NESTE-GOTTIGNIES, Valériane MISTIAEN
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Etudes Scientifiques Spécialisées Appliquées aux Communications Humaines, Economiques, Sociales et Symboliques 2019-08-01
Series:Essachess
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.essachess.com/index.php/jcs/article/view/447/481
id doaj-5aa8d3b4118945fab44adb79cc41b9b4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5aa8d3b4118945fab44adb79cc41b9b42021-08-02T05:44:51ZengEtudes Scientifiques Spécialisées Appliquées aux Communications Humaines, Economiques, Sociales et SymboliquesEssachess2066-50831775-352X2019-08-01121(23)121142Communication practices in asylum seekers reception centres: from information precarity to voluntary returnAmandine VAN NESTE-GOTTIGNIES0Valériane MISTIAEN1Université libre de Bruxelles BELGIQUEUniversité libre de Bruxelles, Vrije Universiteit Brussel BELGIQUEThis article focuses on the complex communication constructed between the Belgian Federal Agency for the Reception of Asylum Seekers (Fedasil) and asylum seekers: what do they say to asylum seekers? Why and how? Beyond the message, it is the relation of communication (Wolton, 2018) between reception authorities and asylum seekers that is explored through the analysis of communication during the reception phase. As a consequence of the communication to asylum seekers’ being hardly visible (Van Neste-Gottignies & Mistiaen, 2018), they are found to experience “information precarity” (Wall, Otis Campbell & Janbek, 2015). Although the “invisibility” of reception discourses seems to prevail, there is an ex-ception: communication regarding voluntary return programmes. This article aims specifically to deeply understand this communicational practice to asylum seekers: what does it contain? Beyond the content: what different forms does it take? Why is Fedasil communication on voluntary return to asylums seekers predominant? The analysis takes into account the complexity and variety of mediums of communica-tion, from mediated forms of communication to face-to-face interactions. To study practices, a corpus linguistics analysis is combined with field survey methods in a Belgian asylum seekers reception centre. http://www.essachess.com/index.php/jcs/article/view/447/481asylumcommunicationdiscriminationreception
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amandine VAN NESTE-GOTTIGNIES
Valériane MISTIAEN
spellingShingle Amandine VAN NESTE-GOTTIGNIES
Valériane MISTIAEN
Communication practices in asylum seekers reception centres: from information precarity to voluntary return
Essachess
asylum
communication
discrimination
reception
author_facet Amandine VAN NESTE-GOTTIGNIES
Valériane MISTIAEN
author_sort Amandine VAN NESTE-GOTTIGNIES
title Communication practices in asylum seekers reception centres: from information precarity to voluntary return
title_short Communication practices in asylum seekers reception centres: from information precarity to voluntary return
title_full Communication practices in asylum seekers reception centres: from information precarity to voluntary return
title_fullStr Communication practices in asylum seekers reception centres: from information precarity to voluntary return
title_full_unstemmed Communication practices in asylum seekers reception centres: from information precarity to voluntary return
title_sort communication practices in asylum seekers reception centres: from information precarity to voluntary return
publisher Etudes Scientifiques Spécialisées Appliquées aux Communications Humaines, Economiques, Sociales et Symboliques
series Essachess
issn 2066-5083
1775-352X
publishDate 2019-08-01
description This article focuses on the complex communication constructed between the Belgian Federal Agency for the Reception of Asylum Seekers (Fedasil) and asylum seekers: what do they say to asylum seekers? Why and how? Beyond the message, it is the relation of communication (Wolton, 2018) between reception authorities and asylum seekers that is explored through the analysis of communication during the reception phase. As a consequence of the communication to asylum seekers’ being hardly visible (Van Neste-Gottignies & Mistiaen, 2018), they are found to experience “information precarity” (Wall, Otis Campbell & Janbek, 2015). Although the “invisibility” of reception discourses seems to prevail, there is an ex-ception: communication regarding voluntary return programmes. This article aims specifically to deeply understand this communicational practice to asylum seekers: what does it contain? Beyond the content: what different forms does it take? Why is Fedasil communication on voluntary return to asylums seekers predominant? The analysis takes into account the complexity and variety of mediums of communica-tion, from mediated forms of communication to face-to-face interactions. To study practices, a corpus linguistics analysis is combined with field survey methods in a Belgian asylum seekers reception centre.
topic asylum
communication
discrimination
reception
url http://www.essachess.com/index.php/jcs/article/view/447/481
work_keys_str_mv AT amandinevannestegottignies communicationpracticesinasylumseekersreceptioncentresfrominformationprecaritytovoluntaryreturn
AT valerianemistiaen communicationpracticesinasylumseekersreceptioncentresfrominformationprecaritytovoluntaryreturn
_version_ 1721240947368394752