The judgement of biases included in the category “other bias” in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey
Abstract Background Clinical decisions are made based on Cochrane reviews, but the implementation of results of evidence syntheses such as Cochrane reviews is problematic if the evidence is not prepared consistently. All systematic reviews should assess the risk of bias (RoB) in included studies, an...
Main Authors: | Andrija Babic, Andela Pijuk, Lucie Brázdilová, Yuliyana Georgieva, Marco António Raposo Pereira, Tina Poklepovic Pericic, Livia Puljak |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-04-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-019-0718-8 |
Similar Items
-
Assessments of attrition bias in Cochrane systematic reviews are highly inconsistent and thus hindering trial comparability
by: Andrija Babic, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01) -
Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook
by: Ognjen Barcot, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01) -
Adequacy of risk of bias assessment in surgical vs non-surgical trials in Cochrane reviews: a methodological study
by: Ognjen Barcot, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01) -
Assessing the risk of performance and detection bias in Cochrane reviews as a joint domain is less accurate compared to two separate domains
by: Ognjen Barcot, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01) -
Risk of bias judgements and strength of conclusions in meta-evidence from the Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group
by: John Delaney, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01)