Effects of urban green spaces on human perceived health improvements: Provision of green spaces is not enough but how people use them matters.

How could we explain the mechanism driving the effects of Urban Green Space (UGS) on human health? This mechanism is a complex one suggesting, on one hand, an indirect effect of UGS Provision (measured as quantity, quality or accessibility of UGS) on health through UGS Exposure (measured as visit fr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kowiyou Yessoufou, Mercy Sithole, Hosam O Elansary
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239314
id doaj-5a9f522f2cf247b2ba2146183bae5934
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5a9f522f2cf247b2ba2146183bae59342021-03-03T22:06:42ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01159e023931410.1371/journal.pone.0239314Effects of urban green spaces on human perceived health improvements: Provision of green spaces is not enough but how people use them matters.Kowiyou YessoufouMercy SitholeHosam O ElansaryHow could we explain the mechanism driving the effects of Urban Green Space (UGS) on human health? This mechanism is a complex one suggesting, on one hand, an indirect effect of UGS Provision (measured as quantity, quality or accessibility of UGS) on health through UGS Exposure (measured as visit frequency to UGS, duration of visit or intensity of activities taking place during the visit). On the other hand, UGS Provision may have an indirect effect on Exposure, mediated by people's perception of UGS. The mechanism further suggests that UGS Exposure may influence indirectly human Health but mediated by human motivation to use UGS. We tested these different expectations by fitting 12 alternative structural equation models (SEMs) corresponding to four different scenarios, depending on how UGS Provision was approximated. We show that SEMs where i) Provision is approximated as UGS quantity, and Exposure as duration (SEMi), ii) Provision is approximated as quantity, and Exposure as intensity (SEMii) and iii) Provision is approximated as distance of the closest UGS from people's house, and Exposure as intensity (SEMiii) are equally the best of all 12 SEMs tested. However, apart from the SEMi that has no significant path, SEMii and SEMiii have the same significant path (motivation ~ intensity; β = 7.86±2.03, p = 0.0002), suggesting that visits to UGS may be motivated by opportunities of physical activities offered by UGS. In all our scenarios, the best SEM is always the one where Exposure is measured as intensity, irrespective of how Provision is approximated. This suggests that it is not only UGS provision that matters the most in the mechanism linking UGS to human health improvement, but rather intensity, i.e. the type of activities people engage in when they visit UGSs. Overall, our findings support the theoretical model tested in this study.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239314
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kowiyou Yessoufou
Mercy Sithole
Hosam O Elansary
spellingShingle Kowiyou Yessoufou
Mercy Sithole
Hosam O Elansary
Effects of urban green spaces on human perceived health improvements: Provision of green spaces is not enough but how people use them matters.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Kowiyou Yessoufou
Mercy Sithole
Hosam O Elansary
author_sort Kowiyou Yessoufou
title Effects of urban green spaces on human perceived health improvements: Provision of green spaces is not enough but how people use them matters.
title_short Effects of urban green spaces on human perceived health improvements: Provision of green spaces is not enough but how people use them matters.
title_full Effects of urban green spaces on human perceived health improvements: Provision of green spaces is not enough but how people use them matters.
title_fullStr Effects of urban green spaces on human perceived health improvements: Provision of green spaces is not enough but how people use them matters.
title_full_unstemmed Effects of urban green spaces on human perceived health improvements: Provision of green spaces is not enough but how people use them matters.
title_sort effects of urban green spaces on human perceived health improvements: provision of green spaces is not enough but how people use them matters.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description How could we explain the mechanism driving the effects of Urban Green Space (UGS) on human health? This mechanism is a complex one suggesting, on one hand, an indirect effect of UGS Provision (measured as quantity, quality or accessibility of UGS) on health through UGS Exposure (measured as visit frequency to UGS, duration of visit or intensity of activities taking place during the visit). On the other hand, UGS Provision may have an indirect effect on Exposure, mediated by people's perception of UGS. The mechanism further suggests that UGS Exposure may influence indirectly human Health but mediated by human motivation to use UGS. We tested these different expectations by fitting 12 alternative structural equation models (SEMs) corresponding to four different scenarios, depending on how UGS Provision was approximated. We show that SEMs where i) Provision is approximated as UGS quantity, and Exposure as duration (SEMi), ii) Provision is approximated as quantity, and Exposure as intensity (SEMii) and iii) Provision is approximated as distance of the closest UGS from people's house, and Exposure as intensity (SEMiii) are equally the best of all 12 SEMs tested. However, apart from the SEMi that has no significant path, SEMii and SEMiii have the same significant path (motivation ~ intensity; β = 7.86±2.03, p = 0.0002), suggesting that visits to UGS may be motivated by opportunities of physical activities offered by UGS. In all our scenarios, the best SEM is always the one where Exposure is measured as intensity, irrespective of how Provision is approximated. This suggests that it is not only UGS provision that matters the most in the mechanism linking UGS to human health improvement, but rather intensity, i.e. the type of activities people engage in when they visit UGSs. Overall, our findings support the theoretical model tested in this study.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239314
work_keys_str_mv AT kowiyouyessoufou effectsofurbangreenspacesonhumanperceivedhealthimprovementsprovisionofgreenspacesisnotenoughbuthowpeopleusethemmatters
AT mercysithole effectsofurbangreenspacesonhumanperceivedhealthimprovementsprovisionofgreenspacesisnotenoughbuthowpeopleusethemmatters
AT hosamoelansary effectsofurbangreenspacesonhumanperceivedhealthimprovementsprovisionofgreenspacesisnotenoughbuthowpeopleusethemmatters
_version_ 1714813336549326848