How Love for the Image Cast out Fear of It in Early Christianity

Iconoclastic and iconophilic impulses have long vied for pre-eminence in Christianity, coming to one particularly fraught crisis point in the Byzantine Iconomachy of the eighth and ninth centuries. Funding both impulses, this paper argues, is a profound Platonic ambivalence about the image. For Plat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Natalie Carnes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-02-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/8/2/20
id doaj-5a8ba0a5b5d6474bab24c28f42bcd539
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5a8ba0a5b5d6474bab24c28f42bcd5392020-11-25T01:29:28ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442017-02-01822010.3390/rel8020020rel8020020How Love for the Image Cast out Fear of It in Early ChristianityNatalie Carnes0Religion Department, Baylor University, One Bear Place #97284, Waco, TX 76798, USAIconoclastic and iconophilic impulses have long vied for pre-eminence in Christianity, coming to one particularly fraught crisis point in the Byzantine Iconomachy of the eighth and ninth centuries. Funding both impulses, this paper argues, is a profound Platonic ambivalence about the image. For Plato, the image not only deceives and enslaves; it also reveals and inspires. Plotinus, Gregory of Nyssa, Augustine, John of Damascus, and Theodore of Stoudios articulate their own iterations of Plato’s hopes and fears about the image as they attempt different strategies for resolving these dueling inclinations. This paper traces the evolution of image theory across these thinkers to illumine how Theodore of Stoudios’ approach magnifies Platonic image hopes and quells fears in a way that prepares for the ongoing resolution of image anxiety in the iconographic tradition. More than a purely historical interest, this arc of image thought have continuing relevance for image theory today.http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/8/2/20imageiconiconoclasmPlatoPlatonismTheodore of Stoudios
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Natalie Carnes
spellingShingle Natalie Carnes
How Love for the Image Cast out Fear of It in Early Christianity
Religions
image
icon
iconoclasm
Plato
Platonism
Theodore of Stoudios
author_facet Natalie Carnes
author_sort Natalie Carnes
title How Love for the Image Cast out Fear of It in Early Christianity
title_short How Love for the Image Cast out Fear of It in Early Christianity
title_full How Love for the Image Cast out Fear of It in Early Christianity
title_fullStr How Love for the Image Cast out Fear of It in Early Christianity
title_full_unstemmed How Love for the Image Cast out Fear of It in Early Christianity
title_sort how love for the image cast out fear of it in early christianity
publisher MDPI AG
series Religions
issn 2077-1444
publishDate 2017-02-01
description Iconoclastic and iconophilic impulses have long vied for pre-eminence in Christianity, coming to one particularly fraught crisis point in the Byzantine Iconomachy of the eighth and ninth centuries. Funding both impulses, this paper argues, is a profound Platonic ambivalence about the image. For Plato, the image not only deceives and enslaves; it also reveals and inspires. Plotinus, Gregory of Nyssa, Augustine, John of Damascus, and Theodore of Stoudios articulate their own iterations of Plato’s hopes and fears about the image as they attempt different strategies for resolving these dueling inclinations. This paper traces the evolution of image theory across these thinkers to illumine how Theodore of Stoudios’ approach magnifies Platonic image hopes and quells fears in a way that prepares for the ongoing resolution of image anxiety in the iconographic tradition. More than a purely historical interest, this arc of image thought have continuing relevance for image theory today.
topic image
icon
iconoclasm
Plato
Platonism
Theodore of Stoudios
url http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/8/2/20
work_keys_str_mv AT nataliecarnes howlovefortheimagecastoutfearofitinearlychristianity
_version_ 1725096874563600384