Impact of the January Effect on Return Rates in the Markets of the 2004 EU Enlargement

Purpose: The article presents the results of a study conducted for the January effect. This anomaly is best recognized in the capital markets. In this case, we fnd explanation of its appearance based on both fundamental analysis and heuristics used by investors. The research focuses on the marke...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Błażej Podgórski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kozminski University 2018-07-01
Series:Journal of Management and Business Administration, Central Europe
Subjects:
Online Access:https://mbace.eu/resources/html/article/details?id=168258
id doaj-5a8a7589b594419f859e267c6c9e946d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5a8a7589b594419f859e267c6c9e946d2020-11-24T22:12:52ZengKozminski UniversityJournal of Management and Business Administration, Central Europe2450-78142450-88292018-07-01261274810.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.218Impact of the January Effect on Return Rates in the Markets of the 2004 EU EnlargementBłażej Podgórski0Kozminski University Purpose: The article presents the results of a study conducted for the January effect. This anomaly is best recognized in the capital markets. In this case, we fnd explanation of its appearance based on both fundamental analysis and heuristics used by investors. The research focuses on the markets of the European Union enlargement countries of 2004. There are three hypotheses stated in the article: Hypothesis 1: The January Effect occurs in the analyzed markets. Hypothesis 2: The January Effect weakens over time. Hypothesis 3: The January Effect weakens with the development of a market. Methodology: Three methods verifed the hypotheses: tests of differences, average and median rate of return, and dynamic models paneled with the estimation of parameters and the generalized method of moments. Findings: The January Effect exists in the analyzed markets. The anomaly weakens over time but, after accession to the European Union, January return rates increase signifcantly. Limitation: The defnite verifcation was diffcult due to the available methods and data. Further research in this feld is, therefore, needed. Originality: The originality of the paper stems from the construction of the sample – new evidence from post-communist countries – which became the European Union members in 2004. The next important issue is the period of twenty years after the economic transformation – ten before and ten after the enlargement of the EU.https://mbace.eu/resources/html/article/details?id=168258January Effectgeneralized method of momentsdynamic panel data models
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Błażej Podgórski
spellingShingle Błażej Podgórski
Impact of the January Effect on Return Rates in the Markets of the 2004 EU Enlargement
Journal of Management and Business Administration, Central Europe
January Effect
generalized method of moments
dynamic panel data models
author_facet Błażej Podgórski
author_sort Błażej Podgórski
title Impact of the January Effect on Return Rates in the Markets of the 2004 EU Enlargement
title_short Impact of the January Effect on Return Rates in the Markets of the 2004 EU Enlargement
title_full Impact of the January Effect on Return Rates in the Markets of the 2004 EU Enlargement
title_fullStr Impact of the January Effect on Return Rates in the Markets of the 2004 EU Enlargement
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the January Effect on Return Rates in the Markets of the 2004 EU Enlargement
title_sort impact of the january effect on return rates in the markets of the 2004 eu enlargement
publisher Kozminski University
series Journal of Management and Business Administration, Central Europe
issn 2450-7814
2450-8829
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Purpose: The article presents the results of a study conducted for the January effect. This anomaly is best recognized in the capital markets. In this case, we fnd explanation of its appearance based on both fundamental analysis and heuristics used by investors. The research focuses on the markets of the European Union enlargement countries of 2004. There are three hypotheses stated in the article: Hypothesis 1: The January Effect occurs in the analyzed markets. Hypothesis 2: The January Effect weakens over time. Hypothesis 3: The January Effect weakens with the development of a market. Methodology: Three methods verifed the hypotheses: tests of differences, average and median rate of return, and dynamic models paneled with the estimation of parameters and the generalized method of moments. Findings: The January Effect exists in the analyzed markets. The anomaly weakens over time but, after accession to the European Union, January return rates increase signifcantly. Limitation: The defnite verifcation was diffcult due to the available methods and data. Further research in this feld is, therefore, needed. Originality: The originality of the paper stems from the construction of the sample – new evidence from post-communist countries – which became the European Union members in 2004. The next important issue is the period of twenty years after the economic transformation – ten before and ten after the enlargement of the EU.
topic January Effect
generalized method of moments
dynamic panel data models
url https://mbace.eu/resources/html/article/details?id=168258
work_keys_str_mv AT błazejpodgorski impactofthejanuaryeffectonreturnratesinthemarketsofthe2004euenlargement
_version_ 1725801984967049216