Ecology driving genetic variation: a comparative phylogeography of jungle cat (Felis chaus) and leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in India.

<h4>Background</h4>Comparative phylogeography links historical population processes to current/ecological processes through congruent/incongruent patterns of genetic variation among species/lineages. Despite high biodiversity, India lacks a phylogeographic paradigm due to limited compara...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shomita Mukherjee, Anand Krishnan, Krishnapriya Tamma, Chandrima Home, R Navya, Sonia Joseph, Arundhati Das, Uma Ramakrishnan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2010-10-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/21060831/?tool=EBI
id doaj-5a85aaf5d895450dae95d0e5766034a6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5a85aaf5d895450dae95d0e5766034a62021-03-04T02:15:37ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032010-10-01510e1372410.1371/journal.pone.0013724Ecology driving genetic variation: a comparative phylogeography of jungle cat (Felis chaus) and leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in India.Shomita MukherjeeAnand KrishnanKrishnapriya TammaChandrima HomeR NavyaSonia JosephArundhati DasUma Ramakrishnan<h4>Background</h4>Comparative phylogeography links historical population processes to current/ecological processes through congruent/incongruent patterns of genetic variation among species/lineages. Despite high biodiversity, India lacks a phylogeographic paradigm due to limited comparative studies. We compared the phylogenetic patterns of Indian populations of jungle cat (Felis chaus) and leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis). Given similarities in their distribution within India, evolutionary histories, body size and habits, congruent patterns of genetic variation were expected.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>We collected scats from various biogeographic zones in India and analyzed mtDNA from 55 jungle cats (460 bp NADH5, 141 bp cytochrome b) and 40 leopard cats (362 bp NADH5, 202 bp cytochrome b). Jungle cats revealed high genetic variation, relatively low population structure and demographic expansion around the mid-Pleistocene. In contrast, leopard cats revealed lower genetic variation and high population structure with a F(ST) of 0.86 between North and South Indian populations. Niche-model analyses using two approaches (BIOCLIM and MaxEnt) support absence of leopard cats from Central India, indicating a climate associated barrier. We hypothesize that high summer temperatures limit leopard cat distribution and that a rise in temperature in the peninsular region of India during the LGM caused the split in leopard cat population in India.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>Our results indicate that ecological variables describing a species range can predict genetic patterns. Our study has also resolved the confusion over the distribution of the leopard cat in India. The reciprocally monophyletic island population in the South mandates conservation attention.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/21060831/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shomita Mukherjee
Anand Krishnan
Krishnapriya Tamma
Chandrima Home
R Navya
Sonia Joseph
Arundhati Das
Uma Ramakrishnan
spellingShingle Shomita Mukherjee
Anand Krishnan
Krishnapriya Tamma
Chandrima Home
R Navya
Sonia Joseph
Arundhati Das
Uma Ramakrishnan
Ecology driving genetic variation: a comparative phylogeography of jungle cat (Felis chaus) and leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in India.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Shomita Mukherjee
Anand Krishnan
Krishnapriya Tamma
Chandrima Home
R Navya
Sonia Joseph
Arundhati Das
Uma Ramakrishnan
author_sort Shomita Mukherjee
title Ecology driving genetic variation: a comparative phylogeography of jungle cat (Felis chaus) and leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in India.
title_short Ecology driving genetic variation: a comparative phylogeography of jungle cat (Felis chaus) and leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in India.
title_full Ecology driving genetic variation: a comparative phylogeography of jungle cat (Felis chaus) and leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in India.
title_fullStr Ecology driving genetic variation: a comparative phylogeography of jungle cat (Felis chaus) and leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in India.
title_full_unstemmed Ecology driving genetic variation: a comparative phylogeography of jungle cat (Felis chaus) and leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in India.
title_sort ecology driving genetic variation: a comparative phylogeography of jungle cat (felis chaus) and leopard cat (prionailurus bengalensis) in india.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2010-10-01
description <h4>Background</h4>Comparative phylogeography links historical population processes to current/ecological processes through congruent/incongruent patterns of genetic variation among species/lineages. Despite high biodiversity, India lacks a phylogeographic paradigm due to limited comparative studies. We compared the phylogenetic patterns of Indian populations of jungle cat (Felis chaus) and leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis). Given similarities in their distribution within India, evolutionary histories, body size and habits, congruent patterns of genetic variation were expected.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>We collected scats from various biogeographic zones in India and analyzed mtDNA from 55 jungle cats (460 bp NADH5, 141 bp cytochrome b) and 40 leopard cats (362 bp NADH5, 202 bp cytochrome b). Jungle cats revealed high genetic variation, relatively low population structure and demographic expansion around the mid-Pleistocene. In contrast, leopard cats revealed lower genetic variation and high population structure with a F(ST) of 0.86 between North and South Indian populations. Niche-model analyses using two approaches (BIOCLIM and MaxEnt) support absence of leopard cats from Central India, indicating a climate associated barrier. We hypothesize that high summer temperatures limit leopard cat distribution and that a rise in temperature in the peninsular region of India during the LGM caused the split in leopard cat population in India.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>Our results indicate that ecological variables describing a species range can predict genetic patterns. Our study has also resolved the confusion over the distribution of the leopard cat in India. The reciprocally monophyletic island population in the South mandates conservation attention.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/21060831/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT shomitamukherjee ecologydrivinggeneticvariationacomparativephylogeographyofjunglecatfelischausandleopardcatprionailurusbengalensisinindia
AT anandkrishnan ecologydrivinggeneticvariationacomparativephylogeographyofjunglecatfelischausandleopardcatprionailurusbengalensisinindia
AT krishnapriyatamma ecologydrivinggeneticvariationacomparativephylogeographyofjunglecatfelischausandleopardcatprionailurusbengalensisinindia
AT chandrimahome ecologydrivinggeneticvariationacomparativephylogeographyofjunglecatfelischausandleopardcatprionailurusbengalensisinindia
AT rnavya ecologydrivinggeneticvariationacomparativephylogeographyofjunglecatfelischausandleopardcatprionailurusbengalensisinindia
AT soniajoseph ecologydrivinggeneticvariationacomparativephylogeographyofjunglecatfelischausandleopardcatprionailurusbengalensisinindia
AT arundhatidas ecologydrivinggeneticvariationacomparativephylogeographyofjunglecatfelischausandleopardcatprionailurusbengalensisinindia
AT umaramakrishnan ecologydrivinggeneticvariationacomparativephylogeographyofjunglecatfelischausandleopardcatprionailurusbengalensisinindia
_version_ 1714808761237897216