Confidence Measurement in the Light of Signal Detection Theory

We compare three alternative methods for eliciting retrospective confidence in the context of a simple perceptual task: the Simple Confidence Rating (a direct report on a numerical scale), the Quadratic Scoring Rule (a post-wagering procedure) and the Matching Probability (a generalization of the no...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sébastien eMassoni, Thibault eGajdos, Jean-Christophe eVergnaud
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01455/full
id doaj-5a63c0157bc34cb7a62f76817b6ec9fa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5a63c0157bc34cb7a62f76817b6ec9fa2020-11-24T20:48:23ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782014-12-01510.3389/fpsyg.2014.01455113062Confidence Measurement in the Light of Signal Detection TheorySébastien eMassoni0Thibault eGajdos1Jean-Christophe eVergnaud2Queensland University of TechnologyAix Marseille UniversityUniversity of Paris 1We compare three alternative methods for eliciting retrospective confidence in the context of a simple perceptual task: the Simple Confidence Rating (a direct report on a numerical scale), the Quadratic Scoring Rule (a post-wagering procedure) and the Matching Probability (a generalization of the no-loss gambling method). We systematically compare the results obtained with these three rules to the theoretical confidence levels that can be inferred from performance in the perceptual task using Signal Detection Theory. We find that the Matching Probability provides better results in that respect. We conclude that Matching Probability is particularly well suited for studies of confidence that use Signal Detection Theory as a theoretical framework.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01455/fullPsychophysicsconfidenceSignal detection theorymethodology comparisonincentives and rewardsScoring Rules
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sébastien eMassoni
Thibault eGajdos
Jean-Christophe eVergnaud
spellingShingle Sébastien eMassoni
Thibault eGajdos
Jean-Christophe eVergnaud
Confidence Measurement in the Light of Signal Detection Theory
Frontiers in Psychology
Psychophysics
confidence
Signal detection theory
methodology comparison
incentives and rewards
Scoring Rules
author_facet Sébastien eMassoni
Thibault eGajdos
Jean-Christophe eVergnaud
author_sort Sébastien eMassoni
title Confidence Measurement in the Light of Signal Detection Theory
title_short Confidence Measurement in the Light of Signal Detection Theory
title_full Confidence Measurement in the Light of Signal Detection Theory
title_fullStr Confidence Measurement in the Light of Signal Detection Theory
title_full_unstemmed Confidence Measurement in the Light of Signal Detection Theory
title_sort confidence measurement in the light of signal detection theory
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2014-12-01
description We compare three alternative methods for eliciting retrospective confidence in the context of a simple perceptual task: the Simple Confidence Rating (a direct report on a numerical scale), the Quadratic Scoring Rule (a post-wagering procedure) and the Matching Probability (a generalization of the no-loss gambling method). We systematically compare the results obtained with these three rules to the theoretical confidence levels that can be inferred from performance in the perceptual task using Signal Detection Theory. We find that the Matching Probability provides better results in that respect. We conclude that Matching Probability is particularly well suited for studies of confidence that use Signal Detection Theory as a theoretical framework.
topic Psychophysics
confidence
Signal detection theory
methodology comparison
incentives and rewards
Scoring Rules
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01455/full
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastienemassoni confidencemeasurementinthelightofsignaldetectiontheory
AT thibaultegajdos confidencemeasurementinthelightofsignaldetectiontheory
AT jeanchristopheevergnaud confidencemeasurementinthelightofsignaldetectiontheory
_version_ 1716807949892976640