Confidence Measurement in the Light of Signal Detection Theory
We compare three alternative methods for eliciting retrospective confidence in the context of a simple perceptual task: the Simple Confidence Rating (a direct report on a numerical scale), the Quadratic Scoring Rule (a post-wagering procedure) and the Matching Probability (a generalization of the no...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014-12-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01455/full |
id |
doaj-5a63c0157bc34cb7a62f76817b6ec9fa |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5a63c0157bc34cb7a62f76817b6ec9fa2020-11-24T20:48:23ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782014-12-01510.3389/fpsyg.2014.01455113062Confidence Measurement in the Light of Signal Detection TheorySébastien eMassoni0Thibault eGajdos1Jean-Christophe eVergnaud2Queensland University of TechnologyAix Marseille UniversityUniversity of Paris 1We compare three alternative methods for eliciting retrospective confidence in the context of a simple perceptual task: the Simple Confidence Rating (a direct report on a numerical scale), the Quadratic Scoring Rule (a post-wagering procedure) and the Matching Probability (a generalization of the no-loss gambling method). We systematically compare the results obtained with these three rules to the theoretical confidence levels that can be inferred from performance in the perceptual task using Signal Detection Theory. We find that the Matching Probability provides better results in that respect. We conclude that Matching Probability is particularly well suited for studies of confidence that use Signal Detection Theory as a theoretical framework.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01455/fullPsychophysicsconfidenceSignal detection theorymethodology comparisonincentives and rewardsScoring Rules |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sébastien eMassoni Thibault eGajdos Jean-Christophe eVergnaud |
spellingShingle |
Sébastien eMassoni Thibault eGajdos Jean-Christophe eVergnaud Confidence Measurement in the Light of Signal Detection Theory Frontiers in Psychology Psychophysics confidence Signal detection theory methodology comparison incentives and rewards Scoring Rules |
author_facet |
Sébastien eMassoni Thibault eGajdos Jean-Christophe eVergnaud |
author_sort |
Sébastien eMassoni |
title |
Confidence Measurement in the Light of Signal Detection Theory |
title_short |
Confidence Measurement in the Light of Signal Detection Theory |
title_full |
Confidence Measurement in the Light of Signal Detection Theory |
title_fullStr |
Confidence Measurement in the Light of Signal Detection Theory |
title_full_unstemmed |
Confidence Measurement in the Light of Signal Detection Theory |
title_sort |
confidence measurement in the light of signal detection theory |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2014-12-01 |
description |
We compare three alternative methods for eliciting retrospective confidence in the context of a simple perceptual task: the Simple Confidence Rating (a direct report on a numerical scale), the Quadratic Scoring Rule (a post-wagering procedure) and the Matching Probability (a generalization of the no-loss gambling method). We systematically compare the results obtained with these three rules to the theoretical confidence levels that can be inferred from performance in the perceptual task using Signal Detection Theory. We find that the Matching Probability provides better results in that respect. We conclude that Matching Probability is particularly well suited for studies of confidence that use Signal Detection Theory as a theoretical framework. |
topic |
Psychophysics confidence Signal detection theory methodology comparison incentives and rewards Scoring Rules |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01455/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sebastienemassoni confidencemeasurementinthelightofsignaldetectiontheory AT thibaultegajdos confidencemeasurementinthelightofsignaldetectiontheory AT jeanchristopheevergnaud confidencemeasurementinthelightofsignaldetectiontheory |
_version_ |
1716807949892976640 |