Religion and Genocide Nexuses: Bosnia as Case Study

Social scientists have been involved in systematic research on genocide for over forty years, yet an under-examined aspect of genocide literature is a sustained focus on the nexuses of religion and genocide, a lacuna that this article seeks to address. Four ways religion and genocide intersect are p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kate E. Temoney
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-06-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/8/6/112
id doaj-5a57973b3be24c41bf41f1ef66303749
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5a57973b3be24c41bf41f1ef663037492020-11-24T21:06:51ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442017-06-018611210.3390/rel8060112rel8060112Religion and Genocide Nexuses: Bosnia as Case StudyKate E. Temoney0Department of Religion, Montclair State University, Dickson Hall 450, 1 Normal Avenue, Montclair, NJ 07043, USASocial scientists have been involved in systematic research on genocide for over forty years, yet an under-examined aspect of genocide literature is a sustained focus on the nexuses of religion and genocide, a lacuna that this article seeks to address. Four ways religion and genocide intersect are proposed, of which two will receive specific attention: (1) how religious rhetoric and (2) how religious individuals and institutions foment genocide. These two intersections are further nuanced by combining a Weberian method of typologies, the Durkheimian theory of collective violence, and empirical data in the form of rhetoric espoused by perpetrators and supporters of the 1995 Bosnian genocide. This combination yields the three typologies of “othering”, justification, and authorization, which are further supported by a review of genocide literature. The typologies provide a framework for analyzing the synergistic relationship between religion and genocide in the interest of devising a model that can be applied to other genocides for investigative and comparative purposes and reveal that religion is both instrumentalized by individuals and institutionally instrumental in genocide perpetration. Individuals explicitly employ religious rhetoric to prey on the fear of the masses, and religious institutions and individuals are indispensable to lending religious justification and moral authority to genocidal campaigns. These results may serve as a starting point for devising strategies that neuter the destructive links between genocide and religion as well as leveraging the ambiguity of religion in favor of its constructive and obviating potential.http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/8/6/112Bosnian genocidereligionreligious rhetoricgenocide prevention
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kate E. Temoney
spellingShingle Kate E. Temoney
Religion and Genocide Nexuses: Bosnia as Case Study
Religions
Bosnian genocide
religion
religious rhetoric
genocide prevention
author_facet Kate E. Temoney
author_sort Kate E. Temoney
title Religion and Genocide Nexuses: Bosnia as Case Study
title_short Religion and Genocide Nexuses: Bosnia as Case Study
title_full Religion and Genocide Nexuses: Bosnia as Case Study
title_fullStr Religion and Genocide Nexuses: Bosnia as Case Study
title_full_unstemmed Religion and Genocide Nexuses: Bosnia as Case Study
title_sort religion and genocide nexuses: bosnia as case study
publisher MDPI AG
series Religions
issn 2077-1444
publishDate 2017-06-01
description Social scientists have been involved in systematic research on genocide for over forty years, yet an under-examined aspect of genocide literature is a sustained focus on the nexuses of religion and genocide, a lacuna that this article seeks to address. Four ways religion and genocide intersect are proposed, of which two will receive specific attention: (1) how religious rhetoric and (2) how religious individuals and institutions foment genocide. These two intersections are further nuanced by combining a Weberian method of typologies, the Durkheimian theory of collective violence, and empirical data in the form of rhetoric espoused by perpetrators and supporters of the 1995 Bosnian genocide. This combination yields the three typologies of “othering”, justification, and authorization, which are further supported by a review of genocide literature. The typologies provide a framework for analyzing the synergistic relationship between religion and genocide in the interest of devising a model that can be applied to other genocides for investigative and comparative purposes and reveal that religion is both instrumentalized by individuals and institutionally instrumental in genocide perpetration. Individuals explicitly employ religious rhetoric to prey on the fear of the masses, and religious institutions and individuals are indispensable to lending religious justification and moral authority to genocidal campaigns. These results may serve as a starting point for devising strategies that neuter the destructive links between genocide and religion as well as leveraging the ambiguity of religion in favor of its constructive and obviating potential.
topic Bosnian genocide
religion
religious rhetoric
genocide prevention
url http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/8/6/112
work_keys_str_mv AT kateetemoney religionandgenocidenexusesbosniaascasestudy
_version_ 1716764515483254784