The case law of the European Court of Justice and the problem of preventing pollution of the marine environment
The author of the article, analyzing the activities of the European Union in the field of prevention of marine pollution and the decision in case C-459/03 “European Commission against Ireland”, argues that the decisions of the Court of Justice are judicial precedents. The judgments on the protectio...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
National University Odessa Law Academy
2018-02-01
|
Series: | Lex Portus |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://lexportus.net.ua/vipusk-2-2018-new/boiko_i_s_pretsedentna_praktyka_sudu_yes_ta_problema_zapobihannia_zabrudnenniu_morskoho_seredovyshcha.pdf |
id |
doaj-5a4a4d4c146441d69735d3f340dacd50 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5a4a4d4c146441d69735d3f340dacd502020-11-25T00:20:50ZengNational University Odessa Law AcademyLex Portus2524-101X2617-541X2018-02-012314010.26886/2524-101X.2.2018.4The case law of the European Court of Justice and the problem of preventing pollution of the marine environmentInna Boyko0PhD in Political Sciences, Docent, Associate Professor of the Department of Maritime Law of the National University “Odessa Maritime Academy”, doctoral student of the Department of International Law of the Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University (8, Didrikhsona St., Odessa, Ukraine)The author of the article, analyzing the activities of the European Union in the field of prevention of marine pollution and the decision in case C-459/03 “European Commission against Ireland”, argues that the decisions of the Court of Justice are judicial precedents. The judgments on the protection of the environment, including prevention of pollution of the marine environment, consider the application and implementation of EU directives, clarify or define certain terms, specify the division of powers between the Member States and the EU on specific issues, and also supplement the content of the constituent documents , as was done in decision No. C-459/03 “Commission against Ireland”. On the example of MOX Plant cases, the author concludes that the conflict of jurisdictions of judicial and arbitration bodies takes place in situations where identical disputes are consistently or simultaneously submitted to the consideration of various bodies of international justice, none of which has an exclusive jurisdiction. According to the decision in case C-459/03 “Commission v. Ireland”, the exclusive jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice is determined not only by the constituent documents of the EU, but also by the European Court of Justice itself. The European Court of Justice found that only it has exclusive jurisdiction over the application and interpretation of EU law, including the rules of international law that have become part of the EU legal order (for example, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea)https://lexportus.net.ua/vipusk-2-2018-new/boiko_i_s_pretsedentna_praktyka_sudu_yes_ta_problema_zapobihannia_zabrudnenniu_morskoho_seredovyshcha.pdfEuropean Court of JusticeInternational Tribunal for the Law of the SeaPermanent Court of Arbitrationexclusive jurisdiction of the CJEUconflict of jurisdictions |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Inna Boyko |
spellingShingle |
Inna Boyko The case law of the European Court of Justice and the problem of preventing pollution of the marine environment Lex Portus European Court of Justice International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea Permanent Court of Arbitration exclusive jurisdiction of the CJEU conflict of jurisdictions |
author_facet |
Inna Boyko |
author_sort |
Inna Boyko |
title |
The case law of the European Court of Justice and the problem of preventing pollution of the marine environment |
title_short |
The case law of the European Court of Justice and the problem of preventing pollution of the marine environment |
title_full |
The case law of the European Court of Justice and the problem of preventing pollution of the marine environment |
title_fullStr |
The case law of the European Court of Justice and the problem of preventing pollution of the marine environment |
title_full_unstemmed |
The case law of the European Court of Justice and the problem of preventing pollution of the marine environment |
title_sort |
case law of the european court of justice and the problem of preventing pollution of the marine environment |
publisher |
National University Odessa Law Academy |
series |
Lex Portus |
issn |
2524-101X 2617-541X |
publishDate |
2018-02-01 |
description |
The author of the article, analyzing the activities of the European Union in the field of prevention of marine pollution and the decision in case C-459/03 “European Commission against Ireland”, argues that the decisions of the Court of Justice are judicial precedents. The judgments on the protection of the environment, including prevention of pollution of the marine environment, consider the application and implementation of EU directives, clarify or define certain terms, specify the division of powers between the Member States and the EU on specific issues, and also supplement the content of the constituent documents , as was done in decision No. C-459/03 “Commission against Ireland”. On the example of MOX Plant cases, the author concludes that the conflict of jurisdictions of judicial and arbitration bodies takes place in situations where identical disputes are consistently or simultaneously submitted to the consideration of various bodies of international justice, none of which has an exclusive jurisdiction. According to the decision in case C-459/03 “Commission v. Ireland”, the exclusive jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice is determined not only by the constituent documents of the EU, but also by the European Court of Justice itself. The European Court of Justice found that only it has exclusive jurisdiction over the application and interpretation of EU law, including the rules of international law that have become part of the EU legal order (for example, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea) |
topic |
European Court of Justice International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea Permanent Court of Arbitration exclusive jurisdiction of the CJEU conflict of jurisdictions |
url |
https://lexportus.net.ua/vipusk-2-2018-new/boiko_i_s_pretsedentna_praktyka_sudu_yes_ta_problema_zapobihannia_zabrudnenniu_morskoho_seredovyshcha.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT innaboyko thecaselawoftheeuropeancourtofjusticeandtheproblemofpreventingpollutionofthemarineenvironment AT innaboyko caselawoftheeuropeancourtofjusticeandtheproblemofpreventingpollutionofthemarineenvironment |
_version_ |
1725365543466172416 |