The case law of the European Court of Justice and the problem of preventing pollution of the marine environment

The author of the article, analyzing the activities of the European Union in the field of prevention of marine pollution and the decision in case C-459/03 “European Commission against Ireland”, argues that the decisions of the Court of Justice are judicial precedents. The judgments on the protectio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Inna Boyko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: National University Odessa Law Academy 2018-02-01
Series:Lex Portus
Subjects:
Online Access:https://lexportus.net.ua/vipusk-2-2018-new/boiko_i_s_pretsedentna_praktyka_sudu_yes_ta_problema_zapobihannia_zabrudnenniu_morskoho_seredovyshcha.pdf
id doaj-5a4a4d4c146441d69735d3f340dacd50
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5a4a4d4c146441d69735d3f340dacd502020-11-25T00:20:50ZengNational University Odessa Law AcademyLex Portus2524-101X2617-541X2018-02-012314010.26886/2524-101X.2.2018.4The case law of the European Court of Justice and the problem of preventing pollution of the marine environmentInna Boyko0PhD in Political Sciences, Docent, Associate Professor of the Department of Maritime Law of the National University “Odessa Maritime Academy”, doctoral student of the Department of International Law of the Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University (8, Didrikhsona St., Odessa, Ukraine)The author of the article, analyzing the activities of the European Union in the field of prevention of marine pollution and the decision in case C-459/03 “European Commission against Ireland”, argues that the decisions of the Court of Justice are judicial precedents. The judgments on the protection of the environment, including prevention of pollution of the marine environment, consider the application and implementation of EU directives, clarify or define certain terms, specify the division of powers between the Member States and the EU on specific issues, and also supplement the content of the constituent documents , as was done in decision No. C-459/03 “Commission against Ireland”. On the example of MOX Plant cases, the author concludes that the conflict of jurisdictions of judicial and arbitration bodies takes place in situations where identical disputes are consistently or simultaneously submitted to the consideration of various bodies of international justice, none of which has an exclusive jurisdiction. According to the decision in case C-459/03 “Commission v. Ireland”, the exclusive jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice is determined not only by the constituent documents of the EU, but also by the European Court of Justice itself. The European Court of Justice found that only it has exclusive jurisdiction over the application and interpretation of EU law, including the rules of international law that have become part of the EU legal order (for example, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea)https://lexportus.net.ua/vipusk-2-2018-new/boiko_i_s_pretsedentna_praktyka_sudu_yes_ta_problema_zapobihannia_zabrudnenniu_morskoho_seredovyshcha.pdfEuropean Court of JusticeInternational Tribunal for the Law of the SeaPermanent Court of Arbitrationexclusive jurisdiction of the CJEUconflict of jurisdictions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Inna Boyko
spellingShingle Inna Boyko
The case law of the European Court of Justice and the problem of preventing pollution of the marine environment
Lex Portus
European Court of Justice
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
Permanent Court of Arbitration
exclusive jurisdiction of the CJEU
conflict of jurisdictions
author_facet Inna Boyko
author_sort Inna Boyko
title The case law of the European Court of Justice and the problem of preventing pollution of the marine environment
title_short The case law of the European Court of Justice and the problem of preventing pollution of the marine environment
title_full The case law of the European Court of Justice and the problem of preventing pollution of the marine environment
title_fullStr The case law of the European Court of Justice and the problem of preventing pollution of the marine environment
title_full_unstemmed The case law of the European Court of Justice and the problem of preventing pollution of the marine environment
title_sort case law of the european court of justice and the problem of preventing pollution of the marine environment
publisher National University Odessa Law Academy
series Lex Portus
issn 2524-101X
2617-541X
publishDate 2018-02-01
description The author of the article, analyzing the activities of the European Union in the field of prevention of marine pollution and the decision in case C-459/03 “European Commission against Ireland”, argues that the decisions of the Court of Justice are judicial precedents. The judgments on the protection of the environment, including prevention of pollution of the marine environment, consider the application and implementation of EU directives, clarify or define certain terms, specify the division of powers between the Member States and the EU on specific issues, and also supplement the content of the constituent documents , as was done in decision No. C-459/03 “Commission against Ireland”. On the example of MOX Plant cases, the author concludes that the conflict of jurisdictions of judicial and arbitration bodies takes place in situations where identical disputes are consistently or simultaneously submitted to the consideration of various bodies of international justice, none of which has an exclusive jurisdiction. According to the decision in case C-459/03 “Commission v. Ireland”, the exclusive jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice is determined not only by the constituent documents of the EU, but also by the European Court of Justice itself. The European Court of Justice found that only it has exclusive jurisdiction over the application and interpretation of EU law, including the rules of international law that have become part of the EU legal order (for example, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea)
topic European Court of Justice
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
Permanent Court of Arbitration
exclusive jurisdiction of the CJEU
conflict of jurisdictions
url https://lexportus.net.ua/vipusk-2-2018-new/boiko_i_s_pretsedentna_praktyka_sudu_yes_ta_problema_zapobihannia_zabrudnenniu_morskoho_seredovyshcha.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT innaboyko thecaselawoftheeuropeancourtofjusticeandtheproblemofpreventingpollutionofthemarineenvironment
AT innaboyko caselawoftheeuropeancourtofjusticeandtheproblemofpreventingpollutionofthemarineenvironment
_version_ 1725365543466172416