Prefixation Ability Index (PAI) as a powerful typological tool of historical linguistics

At present there are many odd hypotheses about the genetic affiliation of certain languages. Most such hypotheses are invented without any serious examination of the structural differences between the languages being compared. The PAI method was inspired by ideas of A. P. Volodin, who noticed that t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Akulov Alexander
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2015-06-01
Series:Lingua Posnaniensis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/linpo-2015-0001
id doaj-5a481a2bcc78449282943a4fc187d56f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5a481a2bcc78449282943a4fc187d56f2021-09-06T19:20:04ZengSciendoLingua Posnaniensis2083-60902015-06-0157172410.1515/linpo-2015-0001Prefixation Ability Index (PAI) as a powerful typological tool of historical linguisticsAkulov Alexander0Independent scholar, Saint PetersburgAt present there are many odd hypotheses about the genetic affiliation of certain languages. Most such hypotheses are invented without any serious examination of the structural differences between the languages being compared. The PAI method was inspired by ideas of A. P. Volodin, who noticed that there were two types of languages, one type has prefixation and the other does not. Actually, there is no sharp divide between the two types, it is more precise to use a coefficient (i.e. PAI) rather than simply ask “does a language allow prefixation?” The PAI theory supposed there was correlation between values of PAI of genetically related languages. Tests of PAI on the material of well assembled stocks prove that such correlations exist. Being applied to Ainu and to languages that are possibly supposed to be related to it. The PAI shows that Ainu that is not related to either Altaic or Nivkh, while a search for relatives of Ainu to the south shows potential. Also PAI can be useful in the case of other unsettled questions of language affiliation in North America, New Guinea, Southeast Asia, Africa and other places.https://doi.org/10.1515/linpo-2015-0001use of typology in comparative linguisticsprefixation ability indexainualtai stocknivkhainu and austroasiaticainu and austronesianisolated languages of siberia and far east
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Akulov Alexander
spellingShingle Akulov Alexander
Prefixation Ability Index (PAI) as a powerful typological tool of historical linguistics
Lingua Posnaniensis
use of typology in comparative linguistics
prefixation ability index
ainu
altai stock
nivkh
ainu and austroasiatic
ainu and austronesian
isolated languages of siberia and far east
author_facet Akulov Alexander
author_sort Akulov Alexander
title Prefixation Ability Index (PAI) as a powerful typological tool of historical linguistics
title_short Prefixation Ability Index (PAI) as a powerful typological tool of historical linguistics
title_full Prefixation Ability Index (PAI) as a powerful typological tool of historical linguistics
title_fullStr Prefixation Ability Index (PAI) as a powerful typological tool of historical linguistics
title_full_unstemmed Prefixation Ability Index (PAI) as a powerful typological tool of historical linguistics
title_sort prefixation ability index (pai) as a powerful typological tool of historical linguistics
publisher Sciendo
series Lingua Posnaniensis
issn 2083-6090
publishDate 2015-06-01
description At present there are many odd hypotheses about the genetic affiliation of certain languages. Most such hypotheses are invented without any serious examination of the structural differences between the languages being compared. The PAI method was inspired by ideas of A. P. Volodin, who noticed that there were two types of languages, one type has prefixation and the other does not. Actually, there is no sharp divide between the two types, it is more precise to use a coefficient (i.e. PAI) rather than simply ask “does a language allow prefixation?” The PAI theory supposed there was correlation between values of PAI of genetically related languages. Tests of PAI on the material of well assembled stocks prove that such correlations exist. Being applied to Ainu and to languages that are possibly supposed to be related to it. The PAI shows that Ainu that is not related to either Altaic or Nivkh, while a search for relatives of Ainu to the south shows potential. Also PAI can be useful in the case of other unsettled questions of language affiliation in North America, New Guinea, Southeast Asia, Africa and other places.
topic use of typology in comparative linguistics
prefixation ability index
ainu
altai stock
nivkh
ainu and austroasiatic
ainu and austronesian
isolated languages of siberia and far east
url https://doi.org/10.1515/linpo-2015-0001
work_keys_str_mv AT akulovalexander prefixationabilityindexpaiasapowerfultypologicaltoolofhistoricallinguistics
_version_ 1717777401030639616