Prefixation Ability Index (PAI) as a powerful typological tool of historical linguistics
At present there are many odd hypotheses about the genetic affiliation of certain languages. Most such hypotheses are invented without any serious examination of the structural differences between the languages being compared. The PAI method was inspired by ideas of A. P. Volodin, who noticed that t...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2015-06-01
|
Series: | Lingua Posnaniensis |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/linpo-2015-0001 |
id |
doaj-5a481a2bcc78449282943a4fc187d56f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5a481a2bcc78449282943a4fc187d56f2021-09-06T19:20:04ZengSciendoLingua Posnaniensis2083-60902015-06-0157172410.1515/linpo-2015-0001Prefixation Ability Index (PAI) as a powerful typological tool of historical linguisticsAkulov Alexander0Independent scholar, Saint PetersburgAt present there are many odd hypotheses about the genetic affiliation of certain languages. Most such hypotheses are invented without any serious examination of the structural differences between the languages being compared. The PAI method was inspired by ideas of A. P. Volodin, who noticed that there were two types of languages, one type has prefixation and the other does not. Actually, there is no sharp divide between the two types, it is more precise to use a coefficient (i.e. PAI) rather than simply ask “does a language allow prefixation?” The PAI theory supposed there was correlation between values of PAI of genetically related languages. Tests of PAI on the material of well assembled stocks prove that such correlations exist. Being applied to Ainu and to languages that are possibly supposed to be related to it. The PAI shows that Ainu that is not related to either Altaic or Nivkh, while a search for relatives of Ainu to the south shows potential. Also PAI can be useful in the case of other unsettled questions of language affiliation in North America, New Guinea, Southeast Asia, Africa and other places.https://doi.org/10.1515/linpo-2015-0001use of typology in comparative linguisticsprefixation ability indexainualtai stocknivkhainu and austroasiaticainu and austronesianisolated languages of siberia and far east |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Akulov Alexander |
spellingShingle |
Akulov Alexander Prefixation Ability Index (PAI) as a powerful typological tool of historical linguistics Lingua Posnaniensis use of typology in comparative linguistics prefixation ability index ainu altai stock nivkh ainu and austroasiatic ainu and austronesian isolated languages of siberia and far east |
author_facet |
Akulov Alexander |
author_sort |
Akulov Alexander |
title |
Prefixation Ability Index (PAI) as a powerful typological tool of historical linguistics |
title_short |
Prefixation Ability Index (PAI) as a powerful typological tool of historical linguistics |
title_full |
Prefixation Ability Index (PAI) as a powerful typological tool of historical linguistics |
title_fullStr |
Prefixation Ability Index (PAI) as a powerful typological tool of historical linguistics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prefixation Ability Index (PAI) as a powerful typological tool of historical linguistics |
title_sort |
prefixation ability index (pai) as a powerful typological tool of historical linguistics |
publisher |
Sciendo |
series |
Lingua Posnaniensis |
issn |
2083-6090 |
publishDate |
2015-06-01 |
description |
At present there are many odd hypotheses about the genetic affiliation of certain languages. Most such hypotheses are invented without any serious examination of the structural differences between the languages being compared. The PAI method was inspired by ideas of A. P. Volodin, who noticed that there were two types of languages, one type has prefixation and the other does not. Actually, there is no sharp divide between the two types, it is more precise to use a coefficient (i.e. PAI) rather than simply ask “does a language allow prefixation?” The PAI theory supposed there was correlation between values of PAI of genetically related languages. Tests of PAI on the material of well assembled stocks prove that such correlations exist. Being applied to Ainu and to languages that are possibly supposed to be related to it. The PAI shows that Ainu that is not related to either Altaic or Nivkh, while a search for relatives of Ainu to the south shows potential. Also PAI can be useful in the case of other unsettled questions of language affiliation in North America, New Guinea, Southeast Asia, Africa and other places. |
topic |
use of typology in comparative linguistics prefixation ability index ainu altai stock nivkh ainu and austroasiatic ainu and austronesian isolated languages of siberia and far east |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/linpo-2015-0001 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT akulovalexander prefixationabilityindexpaiasapowerfultypologicaltoolofhistoricallinguistics |
_version_ |
1717777401030639616 |