Through the Looking Glass: The Queer Narcissism of Selfies

A number of scholars have recently argued that the selfie needs to be understood outside of the discourse of narcissism. Rather than leaving this discourse behind, this article focuses on the “hype” of selfies as narcissistic in order to identify and ultimately trouble the political unconscious of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Greg Goldberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-03-01
Series:Social Media + Society
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117698494
id doaj-5a19da3c0809424caf3f4d9fa82a8bb7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5a19da3c0809424caf3f4d9fa82a8bb72020-11-25T03:20:54ZengSAGE PublishingSocial Media + Society2056-30512017-03-01310.1177/2056305117698494Through the Looking Glass: The Queer Narcissism of SelfiesGreg GoldbergA number of scholars have recently argued that the selfie needs to be understood outside of the discourse of narcissism. Rather than leaving this discourse behind, this article focuses on the “hype” of selfies as narcissistic in order to identify and ultimately trouble the political unconscious of this diagnosis, and to ask, what is the problem of narcissism such that it can serve as a means of devaluing, and what kind of politics might we find in the behaviors, proclivities, or attributes identified as narcissistic? The article argues that the problem of narcissism is less an exaggerated focus on the self than it is a failure of responsibility for oneself, and/or an insufficient concern for the well-being of others to whom the narcissist ought to be responsible. Drawing from the antisocial thesis in queer theory, the article argues that this normative investment in responsible subjectivity is motivated, rather ironically, by a desire to annihilate difference. As a “solution” to this desire, the article offers queer theorist Leo Bersani’s notion of “impersonal narcissism,” which it understands in relation to the queerness of the myth from which narcissism takes its name. In short, the article does not aim to evaluate empirically attributions of selfie narcissism—whether to confirm or falsify—but rather to problematize the diagnosis of narcissism as rooted in a normative project that works to produce responsible subjects, and to suggest that this project is compromised by a queer indifference to difference, as critics fear.https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117698494
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Greg Goldberg
spellingShingle Greg Goldberg
Through the Looking Glass: The Queer Narcissism of Selfies
Social Media + Society
author_facet Greg Goldberg
author_sort Greg Goldberg
title Through the Looking Glass: The Queer Narcissism of Selfies
title_short Through the Looking Glass: The Queer Narcissism of Selfies
title_full Through the Looking Glass: The Queer Narcissism of Selfies
title_fullStr Through the Looking Glass: The Queer Narcissism of Selfies
title_full_unstemmed Through the Looking Glass: The Queer Narcissism of Selfies
title_sort through the looking glass: the queer narcissism of selfies
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Social Media + Society
issn 2056-3051
publishDate 2017-03-01
description A number of scholars have recently argued that the selfie needs to be understood outside of the discourse of narcissism. Rather than leaving this discourse behind, this article focuses on the “hype” of selfies as narcissistic in order to identify and ultimately trouble the political unconscious of this diagnosis, and to ask, what is the problem of narcissism such that it can serve as a means of devaluing, and what kind of politics might we find in the behaviors, proclivities, or attributes identified as narcissistic? The article argues that the problem of narcissism is less an exaggerated focus on the self than it is a failure of responsibility for oneself, and/or an insufficient concern for the well-being of others to whom the narcissist ought to be responsible. Drawing from the antisocial thesis in queer theory, the article argues that this normative investment in responsible subjectivity is motivated, rather ironically, by a desire to annihilate difference. As a “solution” to this desire, the article offers queer theorist Leo Bersani’s notion of “impersonal narcissism,” which it understands in relation to the queerness of the myth from which narcissism takes its name. In short, the article does not aim to evaluate empirically attributions of selfie narcissism—whether to confirm or falsify—but rather to problematize the diagnosis of narcissism as rooted in a normative project that works to produce responsible subjects, and to suggest that this project is compromised by a queer indifference to difference, as critics fear.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117698494
work_keys_str_mv AT greggoldberg throughthelookingglassthequeernarcissismofselfies
_version_ 1724615820809601024