Geometric morphometrics reveals sex-differential shape allometry in a spider

Common scientific wisdom assumes that spider sexual dimorphism (SD) mostly results from sexual selection operating on males. However, testing predictions from this hypothesis, particularly male size hyperallometry, has been restricted by methodological constraints. Here, using geometric morphometric...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carmen Fernández-Montraveta, Jesús Marugán-Lobón
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2017-07-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/3617.pdf
id doaj-5a19a274a20b4be2a7ed8f2242d1cf8e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5a19a274a20b4be2a7ed8f2242d1cf8e2020-11-24T23:44:26ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592017-07-015e361710.7717/peerj.3617Geometric morphometrics reveals sex-differential shape allometry in a spiderCarmen Fernández-Montraveta0Jesús Marugán-Lobón1Departamento de Psicología Biológica y de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, SpainDepartamento de Biología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, SpainCommon scientific wisdom assumes that spider sexual dimorphism (SD) mostly results from sexual selection operating on males. However, testing predictions from this hypothesis, particularly male size hyperallometry, has been restricted by methodological constraints. Here, using geometric morphometrics (GMM) we studied for the first time sex-differential shape allometry in a spider (Donacosa merlini, Araneae: Lycosidae) known to exhibit the reverse pattern (i.e., male-biased) of spider sexual size dimorphism. GMM reveals previously undetected sex-differential shape allometry and sex-related shape differences that are size independent (i.e., associated to the y-intercept, and not to size scaling). Sexual shape dimorphism affects both the relative carapace-to-opisthosoma size and the carapace geometry, arguably resulting from sex differences in both reproductive roles (female egg load and male competition) and life styles (wandering males and burrowing females). Our results demonstrate that body portions may vary modularly in response to different selection pressures, giving rise to sex differences in shape, which reconciles previously considered mutually exclusive interpretations about the origins of spider SD.https://peerj.com/articles/3617.pdfSexual size dimorphismAllometrySexual selectionSpidersDonacosa merliniDoñana
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carmen Fernández-Montraveta
Jesús Marugán-Lobón
spellingShingle Carmen Fernández-Montraveta
Jesús Marugán-Lobón
Geometric morphometrics reveals sex-differential shape allometry in a spider
PeerJ
Sexual size dimorphism
Allometry
Sexual selection
Spiders
Donacosa merlini
Doñana
author_facet Carmen Fernández-Montraveta
Jesús Marugán-Lobón
author_sort Carmen Fernández-Montraveta
title Geometric morphometrics reveals sex-differential shape allometry in a spider
title_short Geometric morphometrics reveals sex-differential shape allometry in a spider
title_full Geometric morphometrics reveals sex-differential shape allometry in a spider
title_fullStr Geometric morphometrics reveals sex-differential shape allometry in a spider
title_full_unstemmed Geometric morphometrics reveals sex-differential shape allometry in a spider
title_sort geometric morphometrics reveals sex-differential shape allometry in a spider
publisher PeerJ Inc.
series PeerJ
issn 2167-8359
publishDate 2017-07-01
description Common scientific wisdom assumes that spider sexual dimorphism (SD) mostly results from sexual selection operating on males. However, testing predictions from this hypothesis, particularly male size hyperallometry, has been restricted by methodological constraints. Here, using geometric morphometrics (GMM) we studied for the first time sex-differential shape allometry in a spider (Donacosa merlini, Araneae: Lycosidae) known to exhibit the reverse pattern (i.e., male-biased) of spider sexual size dimorphism. GMM reveals previously undetected sex-differential shape allometry and sex-related shape differences that are size independent (i.e., associated to the y-intercept, and not to size scaling). Sexual shape dimorphism affects both the relative carapace-to-opisthosoma size and the carapace geometry, arguably resulting from sex differences in both reproductive roles (female egg load and male competition) and life styles (wandering males and burrowing females). Our results demonstrate that body portions may vary modularly in response to different selection pressures, giving rise to sex differences in shape, which reconciles previously considered mutually exclusive interpretations about the origins of spider SD.
topic Sexual size dimorphism
Allometry
Sexual selection
Spiders
Donacosa merlini
Doñana
url https://peerj.com/articles/3617.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT carmenfernandezmontraveta geometricmorphometricsrevealssexdifferentialshapeallometryinaspider
AT jesusmaruganlobon geometricmorphometricsrevealssexdifferentialshapeallometryinaspider
_version_ 1725498571426365440