Whose discourse? Dialogic Pedagogy for a post-truth world
If, as evidence shows, well-founded classroom dialogue improves student engagement and learning, the logical next step is to take it to scale. However, this presumes consensus on definitions and purposes, whereas accounts of dialogue and dialogic teaching/pedagogy/education range from the narrowly t...
Main Author: | Robin Alexander |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
2019-03-01
|
Series: | Dialogic Pedagogy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dpj.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/dpj1/article/view/268 |
Similar Items
-
Whose Discourse, Whose Ears? Harmony in Dialogic Pedagogy amidst the Post-Truth Noise
by: Aireen Grace Andal
Published: (2019-03-01) -
Dialogic analysis vs. discourse analysis of dialogic pedagogy: Social science research in the era of positivism and post-truth
by: Eugene Matusov, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01) -
Commentary on Eugene and Kiyo’s dialogue on dialogic pedagogy
by: Rupert Wegerif
Published: (2014-10-01) -
Pedagogy of Peace and Philosophy of War: the Search for Truth
by: Serhiy Klepko
Published: (2017-07-01) -
Values in dialogic pedagogy
by: Eugene Matusov, et al.
Published: (2015-02-01)