A Case of Cementless Impaction Bone Graft in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Requiring Calcar Reconstruction

Introduction. In cases of bone deficiency or osteoporosis, and especially in revision cases, there were only two options for treatment until the impaction bone graft procedure was proposed. These were cemented or cementless femoral prosthesis. In the early 1990s, the use of impaction bone graft with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shigeo Ishiguro, Kunihiro Asanuma, Tatsuya Tamaki, Kazuhiro Oinuma, Akihiro Sudo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2021-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Orthopedics
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8811593
id doaj-5a0abc281b64426bb762bda5ca4ba0c6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5a0abc281b64426bb762bda5ca4ba0c62021-03-08T02:01:10ZengHindawi LimitedCase Reports in Orthopedics2090-67572021-01-01202110.1155/2021/8811593A Case of Cementless Impaction Bone Graft in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Requiring Calcar ReconstructionShigeo Ishiguro0Kunihiro Asanuma1Tatsuya Tamaki2Kazuhiro Oinuma3Akihiro Sudo4Orthopaedic SurgeryDepartment of Orthopaedic SurgeryFunabashi Orthopaedic HospitalFunabashi Orthopaedic HospitalDepartment of Orthopaedic SurgeryIntroduction. In cases of bone deficiency or osteoporosis, and especially in revision cases, there were only two options for treatment until the impaction bone graft procedure was proposed. These were cemented or cementless femoral prosthesis. In the early 1990s, the use of impaction bone graft with a cemented mantle had gained popularity and had proven to be clinically effective. In Germany, a cementless impaction bone graft procedure using Corail® (DePuy Synthes) stems was devised, and functional scores were similar to conventional cemented Impaction bone grafts. Case presentation. A 48-year-old man presented with femur loosening of a reamed bipolar arthroplasty performed in 1990. The patient was treated with a cementless impaction bone graft using a Corail® (DePuy Synthes) stem in the femur in revision THA surgery, and the calcar was reconstructed by allograft. Results. At five years, the calcar allograft united with the host bone, and the femoral component showed no subsidence. Conclusion. Calcar reconstruction with a strut allograft, aimed at preventing sinking of the stem was key in this operation. Surgical indication for femoral cementless impaction bone graft should be for loosened femoral prosthesis in a type II Paprosky classification, where only the cortical bone of the isthmus is partially affected, cortical thinning does not exist, and it is mechanically strong enough for the allograft tip impaction. The procedure was safely feasible through the direct anterior approach.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8811593
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shigeo Ishiguro
Kunihiro Asanuma
Tatsuya Tamaki
Kazuhiro Oinuma
Akihiro Sudo
spellingShingle Shigeo Ishiguro
Kunihiro Asanuma
Tatsuya Tamaki
Kazuhiro Oinuma
Akihiro Sudo
A Case of Cementless Impaction Bone Graft in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Requiring Calcar Reconstruction
Case Reports in Orthopedics
author_facet Shigeo Ishiguro
Kunihiro Asanuma
Tatsuya Tamaki
Kazuhiro Oinuma
Akihiro Sudo
author_sort Shigeo Ishiguro
title A Case of Cementless Impaction Bone Graft in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Requiring Calcar Reconstruction
title_short A Case of Cementless Impaction Bone Graft in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Requiring Calcar Reconstruction
title_full A Case of Cementless Impaction Bone Graft in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Requiring Calcar Reconstruction
title_fullStr A Case of Cementless Impaction Bone Graft in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Requiring Calcar Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed A Case of Cementless Impaction Bone Graft in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Requiring Calcar Reconstruction
title_sort case of cementless impaction bone graft in a revision total hip arthroplasty requiring calcar reconstruction
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Case Reports in Orthopedics
issn 2090-6757
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Introduction. In cases of bone deficiency or osteoporosis, and especially in revision cases, there were only two options for treatment until the impaction bone graft procedure was proposed. These were cemented or cementless femoral prosthesis. In the early 1990s, the use of impaction bone graft with a cemented mantle had gained popularity and had proven to be clinically effective. In Germany, a cementless impaction bone graft procedure using Corail® (DePuy Synthes) stems was devised, and functional scores were similar to conventional cemented Impaction bone grafts. Case presentation. A 48-year-old man presented with femur loosening of a reamed bipolar arthroplasty performed in 1990. The patient was treated with a cementless impaction bone graft using a Corail® (DePuy Synthes) stem in the femur in revision THA surgery, and the calcar was reconstructed by allograft. Results. At five years, the calcar allograft united with the host bone, and the femoral component showed no subsidence. Conclusion. Calcar reconstruction with a strut allograft, aimed at preventing sinking of the stem was key in this operation. Surgical indication for femoral cementless impaction bone graft should be for loosened femoral prosthesis in a type II Paprosky classification, where only the cortical bone of the isthmus is partially affected, cortical thinning does not exist, and it is mechanically strong enough for the allograft tip impaction. The procedure was safely feasible through the direct anterior approach.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8811593
work_keys_str_mv AT shigeoishiguro acaseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction
AT kunihiroasanuma acaseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction
AT tatsuyatamaki acaseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction
AT kazuhirooinuma acaseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction
AT akihirosudo acaseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction
AT shigeoishiguro caseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction
AT kunihiroasanuma caseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction
AT tatsuyatamaki caseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction
AT kazuhirooinuma caseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction
AT akihirosudo caseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction
_version_ 1714797248505708544