Combination of probiotic and prebiotic impacts Salmonella Enteritidis infection in layer hens

SUMMARY: Mitigation of food pathogens such as Salmonella continues to be a focus in poultry production, whether on shell eggs or meat products. No single approach is fully able to eliminate the risk, but rather comprehensive programs are used in a multifaceted approach. Targeted in-feed additives ar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E.A. Kimminau, T.P. Karnezos, R.D. Berghaus, M.K. Jones, J.A. Baxter, C.L. Hofacre
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-12-01
Series:Journal of Applied Poultry Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056617121000635
Description
Summary:SUMMARY: Mitigation of food pathogens such as Salmonella continues to be a focus in poultry production, whether on shell eggs or meat products. No single approach is fully able to eliminate the risk, but rather comprehensive programs are used in a multifaceted approach. Targeted in-feed additives are a component of a food safety program and may help to reduce Salmonella infection. This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a probiotic and prebiotic combination feed-additive product (Fulfill Plus) to reduce Salmonella Enteritidis (S.E.) infection in layer hens. One-hundred and forty-four (144) 1-day-old Hy-line pullets were raised on new litter until 10 wk of age when they were moved into individual cages. There were 3 treatments, 1) Untreated 2) probiotic and prebiotic combination given D 0 to termination, and 3) probiotic and prebiotic combination given Wk 10 to termination. At 17 weeks-of-age each bird was orally challenged with 3 × 106 CFU/bird nalidixic acid resistant strain of S.E. Seven (7) and 14 d postchallenge, ceca and ovaries were aseptically collected and cultured for S.E. Significant differences (P < 0.05) in prevalence and mean cecal S.E. log10 MPN/g were observed between 7 d postinfection compared with 14 d postinfection. Addition of probiotic and prebiotic combination at wk 10 (Treatment 3) significantly (P < 0.05) reduced S.E. numbers in the ceca of these pullets compared to probiotic and prebiotic combination given at D 0 (Treatment 2). Significant differences (P < 0.05) in prevalence and mean ovary S.E. log10 MPN/g were observed with Treatment 2 being significantly lower than Treatment 3.
ISSN:1056-6171