Understanding Einstein’s Viewpoint on Quantum Mechanics
The controversy between Einstein and Bohr about quantum mechanics is a classic. On the one hand, Einstein rejected it because of its unpredictable essence, while Bohr had no trouble accepting the limits imposed by Nature on human knowledge, being happy with just a statistical description. Time has...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Estonian Association of the History and Philosophy of Science
2015-10-01
|
Series: | Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.bahps.org/03_Masot-Conde-2015-2-03.pdf |
id |
doaj-59e730653c7c4b509861374d017ae7d7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-59e730653c7c4b509861374d017ae7d72020-11-24T23:31:56ZengEstonian Association of the History and Philosophy of ScienceActa Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum2228-20092228-20172015-10-0132536510.11590/abhps.2015.2.03Understanding Einstein’s Viewpoint on Quantum MechanicsFátima Masot-Conde0Escuela Superior IngenierosThe controversy between Einstein and Bohr about quantum mechanics is a classic. On the one hand, Einstein rejected it because of its unpredictable essence, while Bohr had no trouble accepting the limits imposed by Nature on human knowledge, being happy with just a statistical description. Time has passed, and quantum mechanics works beyond any reasonable doubt. That possibly means that Bohr’s world vision was right and we should abandon Einstein’s idea of Nature working as a deterministic clock’s machinery. However, despite the success of the quantum theory, some of its implications still seem absurd, while the world shows a more and more mathematical essence, just as Einstein thought. In this paper, Einstein’s point is defended in the light of the resemblance between Mathematics and the natural world. http://www.bahps.org/03_Masot-Conde-2015-2-03.pdfBohrEinsteinmathematicsquantum mechanics |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Fátima Masot-Conde |
spellingShingle |
Fátima Masot-Conde Understanding Einstein’s Viewpoint on Quantum Mechanics Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum Bohr Einstein mathematics quantum mechanics |
author_facet |
Fátima Masot-Conde |
author_sort |
Fátima Masot-Conde |
title |
Understanding Einstein’s Viewpoint on Quantum Mechanics |
title_short |
Understanding Einstein’s Viewpoint on Quantum Mechanics |
title_full |
Understanding Einstein’s Viewpoint on Quantum Mechanics |
title_fullStr |
Understanding Einstein’s Viewpoint on Quantum Mechanics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Understanding Einstein’s Viewpoint on Quantum Mechanics |
title_sort |
understanding einstein’s viewpoint on quantum mechanics |
publisher |
Estonian Association of the History and Philosophy of Science |
series |
Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum |
issn |
2228-2009 2228-2017 |
publishDate |
2015-10-01 |
description |
The controversy between Einstein and Bohr about quantum
mechanics is a classic. On the one hand, Einstein rejected it because of its unpredictable essence, while Bohr had no trouble accepting the limits imposed by Nature on human knowledge, being happy with just a statistical description. Time has passed, and quantum mechanics works beyond any reasonable doubt. That possibly means that Bohr’s world vision was right and we should abandon Einstein’s idea of Nature working as a deterministic clock’s machinery. However, despite the success of the quantum theory, some of its implications still seem absurd, while the world shows a more and more mathematical essence, just as Einstein thought. In this paper, Einstein’s point is defended in the light of the resemblance between Mathematics and the natural world.
|
topic |
Bohr Einstein mathematics quantum mechanics |
url |
http://www.bahps.org/03_Masot-Conde-2015-2-03.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fatimamasotconde understandingeinsteinsviewpointonquantummechanics |
_version_ |
1725536053257830400 |