Understanding Einstein’s Viewpoint on Quantum Mechanics

The controversy between Einstein and Bohr about quantum mechanics is a classic. On the one hand, Einstein rejected it because of its unpredictable essence, while Bohr had no trouble accepting the limits imposed by Nature on human knowledge, being happy with just a statistical description. Time has...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fátima Masot-Conde
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Estonian Association of the History and Philosophy of Science 2015-10-01
Series:Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.bahps.org/03_Masot-Conde-2015-2-03.pdf
id doaj-59e730653c7c4b509861374d017ae7d7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-59e730653c7c4b509861374d017ae7d72020-11-24T23:31:56ZengEstonian Association of the History and Philosophy of ScienceActa Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum2228-20092228-20172015-10-0132536510.11590/abhps.2015.2.03Understanding Einstein’s Viewpoint on Quantum MechanicsFátima Masot-Conde0Escuela Superior IngenierosThe controversy between Einstein and Bohr about quantum mechanics is a classic. On the one hand, Einstein rejected it because of its unpredictable essence, while Bohr had no trouble accepting the limits imposed by Nature on human knowledge, being happy with just a statistical description. Time has passed, and quantum mechanics works beyond any reasonable doubt. That possibly means that Bohr’s world vision was right and we should abandon Einstein’s idea of Nature working as a deterministic clock’s machinery. However, despite the success of the quantum theory, some of its implications still seem absurd, while the world shows a more and more mathematical essence, just as Einstein thought. In this paper, Einstein’s point is defended in the light of the resemblance between Mathematics and the natural world. http://www.bahps.org/03_Masot-Conde-2015-2-03.pdfBohrEinsteinmathematicsquantum mechanics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fátima Masot-Conde
spellingShingle Fátima Masot-Conde
Understanding Einstein’s Viewpoint on Quantum Mechanics
Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum
Bohr
Einstein
mathematics
quantum mechanics
author_facet Fátima Masot-Conde
author_sort Fátima Masot-Conde
title Understanding Einstein’s Viewpoint on Quantum Mechanics
title_short Understanding Einstein’s Viewpoint on Quantum Mechanics
title_full Understanding Einstein’s Viewpoint on Quantum Mechanics
title_fullStr Understanding Einstein’s Viewpoint on Quantum Mechanics
title_full_unstemmed Understanding Einstein’s Viewpoint on Quantum Mechanics
title_sort understanding einstein’s viewpoint on quantum mechanics
publisher Estonian Association of the History and Philosophy of Science
series Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum
issn 2228-2009
2228-2017
publishDate 2015-10-01
description The controversy between Einstein and Bohr about quantum mechanics is a classic. On the one hand, Einstein rejected it because of its unpredictable essence, while Bohr had no trouble accepting the limits imposed by Nature on human knowledge, being happy with just a statistical description. Time has passed, and quantum mechanics works beyond any reasonable doubt. That possibly means that Bohr’s world vision was right and we should abandon Einstein’s idea of Nature working as a deterministic clock’s machinery. However, despite the success of the quantum theory, some of its implications still seem absurd, while the world shows a more and more mathematical essence, just as Einstein thought. In this paper, Einstein’s point is defended in the light of the resemblance between Mathematics and the natural world.
topic Bohr
Einstein
mathematics
quantum mechanics
url http://www.bahps.org/03_Masot-Conde-2015-2-03.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT fatimamasotconde understandingeinsteinsviewpointonquantummechanics
_version_ 1725536053257830400