Discrimination of grade 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by means of analysis of water soluble proteins recovered from cervical biopsies

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grades 2 and 3 are usually grouped and treated in the same way as "high grade", in spite of their different risk to cancer progression and spontaneous regression rates. CIN2-3 is usu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Skaland Ivar, van Diermen Bianca, Gudlaugsson Einar, Brede Cato, Munk Ane, Uleberg Kai-Erik, Malpica Anais, Janssen Emiel AM, Hjelle Anne, Baak Jan PA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-06-01
Series:Proteome Science
Subjects:
CIN
Online Access:http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/36
id doaj-59d0db80d5984a329acdfb88e0fa77e5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-59d0db80d5984a329acdfb88e0fa77e52020-11-25T00:55:04ZengBMCProteome Science1477-59562011-06-01913610.1186/1477-5956-9-36Discrimination of grade 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by means of analysis of water soluble proteins recovered from cervical biopsiesSkaland Ivarvan Diermen BiancaGudlaugsson EinarBrede CatoMunk AneUleberg Kai-ErikMalpica AnaisJanssen Emiel AMHjelle AnneBaak Jan PA<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grades 2 and 3 are usually grouped and treated in the same way as "high grade", in spite of their different risk to cancer progression and spontaneous regression rates. CIN2-3 is usually diagnosed in formaldehyde-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) punch biopsies. This procedure virtually eliminates the availability of water-soluble proteins which could have diagnostic and prognostic value.</p> <p>Aim</p> <p>To investigate whether a water-soluble protein-saving biopsy processing method followed by a proteomic analysis of supernatant samples using LC-MS/MS (LTQ Orbitrap) can be used to distinguish between CIN2 and CIN3.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Fresh cervical punch biopsies from 20 women were incubated in RPMI1640 medium for 24 hours at 4°C for protein extraction and subsequently subjected to standard FFPE processing. P16 and Ki67-supported histologic consensus review CIN grade (CIN2, n = 10, CIN3, n = 10) was assessed by independent gynecological pathologists. The biopsy supernatants were depleted of 7 high abundance proteins prior to uni-dimensional LC-MS/MS analysis for protein identifications.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The age of the patients ranged from 25-40 years (median 29.7), and mean protein concentration was 0.81 mg/ml (range 0.55 - 1.14). After application of multistep identification criteria, 114 proteins were identified, including proteins like vimentin, actin, transthyretin, apolipoprotein A-1, Heat Shock protein beta 1, vitamin D binding protein and different cytokeratins. The identified proteins are annotated to metabolic processes (36%), signal transduction (27%), cell cycle processes (15%) and trafficking/transport (9%). Using binary logistic regression, Cytokeratin 2 was found to have the strongest independent discriminatory power resulting in 90% overall correct classification.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>114 proteins were identified in supernatants from fresh cervical biopsies and many differed between CIN2 and 3. Cytokeratin 2 is the strongest discriminator with 90% overall correct classifications.</p> http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/36cervical intraepithelial neoplasiaCINproteomicsLTQ-Orbitrapmass spectrometry
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Skaland Ivar
van Diermen Bianca
Gudlaugsson Einar
Brede Cato
Munk Ane
Uleberg Kai-Erik
Malpica Anais
Janssen Emiel AM
Hjelle Anne
Baak Jan PA
spellingShingle Skaland Ivar
van Diermen Bianca
Gudlaugsson Einar
Brede Cato
Munk Ane
Uleberg Kai-Erik
Malpica Anais
Janssen Emiel AM
Hjelle Anne
Baak Jan PA
Discrimination of grade 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by means of analysis of water soluble proteins recovered from cervical biopsies
Proteome Science
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
CIN
proteomics
LTQ-Orbitrap
mass spectrometry
author_facet Skaland Ivar
van Diermen Bianca
Gudlaugsson Einar
Brede Cato
Munk Ane
Uleberg Kai-Erik
Malpica Anais
Janssen Emiel AM
Hjelle Anne
Baak Jan PA
author_sort Skaland Ivar
title Discrimination of grade 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by means of analysis of water soluble proteins recovered from cervical biopsies
title_short Discrimination of grade 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by means of analysis of water soluble proteins recovered from cervical biopsies
title_full Discrimination of grade 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by means of analysis of water soluble proteins recovered from cervical biopsies
title_fullStr Discrimination of grade 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by means of analysis of water soluble proteins recovered from cervical biopsies
title_full_unstemmed Discrimination of grade 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by means of analysis of water soluble proteins recovered from cervical biopsies
title_sort discrimination of grade 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by means of analysis of water soluble proteins recovered from cervical biopsies
publisher BMC
series Proteome Science
issn 1477-5956
publishDate 2011-06-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grades 2 and 3 are usually grouped and treated in the same way as "high grade", in spite of their different risk to cancer progression and spontaneous regression rates. CIN2-3 is usually diagnosed in formaldehyde-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) punch biopsies. This procedure virtually eliminates the availability of water-soluble proteins which could have diagnostic and prognostic value.</p> <p>Aim</p> <p>To investigate whether a water-soluble protein-saving biopsy processing method followed by a proteomic analysis of supernatant samples using LC-MS/MS (LTQ Orbitrap) can be used to distinguish between CIN2 and CIN3.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Fresh cervical punch biopsies from 20 women were incubated in RPMI1640 medium for 24 hours at 4°C for protein extraction and subsequently subjected to standard FFPE processing. P16 and Ki67-supported histologic consensus review CIN grade (CIN2, n = 10, CIN3, n = 10) was assessed by independent gynecological pathologists. The biopsy supernatants were depleted of 7 high abundance proteins prior to uni-dimensional LC-MS/MS analysis for protein identifications.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The age of the patients ranged from 25-40 years (median 29.7), and mean protein concentration was 0.81 mg/ml (range 0.55 - 1.14). After application of multistep identification criteria, 114 proteins were identified, including proteins like vimentin, actin, transthyretin, apolipoprotein A-1, Heat Shock protein beta 1, vitamin D binding protein and different cytokeratins. The identified proteins are annotated to metabolic processes (36%), signal transduction (27%), cell cycle processes (15%) and trafficking/transport (9%). Using binary logistic regression, Cytokeratin 2 was found to have the strongest independent discriminatory power resulting in 90% overall correct classification.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>114 proteins were identified in supernatants from fresh cervical biopsies and many differed between CIN2 and 3. Cytokeratin 2 is the strongest discriminator with 90% overall correct classifications.</p>
topic cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
CIN
proteomics
LTQ-Orbitrap
mass spectrometry
url http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/36
work_keys_str_mv AT skalandivar discriminationofgrade2and3cervicalintraepithelialneoplasiabymeansofanalysisofwatersolubleproteinsrecoveredfromcervicalbiopsies
AT vandiermenbianca discriminationofgrade2and3cervicalintraepithelialneoplasiabymeansofanalysisofwatersolubleproteinsrecoveredfromcervicalbiopsies
AT gudlaugssoneinar discriminationofgrade2and3cervicalintraepithelialneoplasiabymeansofanalysisofwatersolubleproteinsrecoveredfromcervicalbiopsies
AT bredecato discriminationofgrade2and3cervicalintraepithelialneoplasiabymeansofanalysisofwatersolubleproteinsrecoveredfromcervicalbiopsies
AT munkane discriminationofgrade2and3cervicalintraepithelialneoplasiabymeansofanalysisofwatersolubleproteinsrecoveredfromcervicalbiopsies
AT ulebergkaierik discriminationofgrade2and3cervicalintraepithelialneoplasiabymeansofanalysisofwatersolubleproteinsrecoveredfromcervicalbiopsies
AT malpicaanais discriminationofgrade2and3cervicalintraepithelialneoplasiabymeansofanalysisofwatersolubleproteinsrecoveredfromcervicalbiopsies
AT janssenemielam discriminationofgrade2and3cervicalintraepithelialneoplasiabymeansofanalysisofwatersolubleproteinsrecoveredfromcervicalbiopsies
AT hjelleanne discriminationofgrade2and3cervicalintraepithelialneoplasiabymeansofanalysisofwatersolubleproteinsrecoveredfromcervicalbiopsies
AT baakjanpa discriminationofgrade2and3cervicalintraepithelialneoplasiabymeansofanalysisofwatersolubleproteinsrecoveredfromcervicalbiopsies
_version_ 1725232274372296704