Discrimination of grade 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by means of analysis of water soluble proteins recovered from cervical biopsies
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grades 2 and 3 are usually grouped and treated in the same way as "high grade", in spite of their different risk to cancer progression and spontaneous regression rates. CIN2-3 is usu...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2011-06-01
|
Series: | Proteome Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/36 |
id |
doaj-59d0db80d5984a329acdfb88e0fa77e5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-59d0db80d5984a329acdfb88e0fa77e52020-11-25T00:55:04ZengBMCProteome Science1477-59562011-06-01913610.1186/1477-5956-9-36Discrimination of grade 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by means of analysis of water soluble proteins recovered from cervical biopsiesSkaland Ivarvan Diermen BiancaGudlaugsson EinarBrede CatoMunk AneUleberg Kai-ErikMalpica AnaisJanssen Emiel AMHjelle AnneBaak Jan PA<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grades 2 and 3 are usually grouped and treated in the same way as "high grade", in spite of their different risk to cancer progression and spontaneous regression rates. CIN2-3 is usually diagnosed in formaldehyde-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) punch biopsies. This procedure virtually eliminates the availability of water-soluble proteins which could have diagnostic and prognostic value.</p> <p>Aim</p> <p>To investigate whether a water-soluble protein-saving biopsy processing method followed by a proteomic analysis of supernatant samples using LC-MS/MS (LTQ Orbitrap) can be used to distinguish between CIN2 and CIN3.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Fresh cervical punch biopsies from 20 women were incubated in RPMI1640 medium for 24 hours at 4°C for protein extraction and subsequently subjected to standard FFPE processing. P16 and Ki67-supported histologic consensus review CIN grade (CIN2, n = 10, CIN3, n = 10) was assessed by independent gynecological pathologists. The biopsy supernatants were depleted of 7 high abundance proteins prior to uni-dimensional LC-MS/MS analysis for protein identifications.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The age of the patients ranged from 25-40 years (median 29.7), and mean protein concentration was 0.81 mg/ml (range 0.55 - 1.14). After application of multistep identification criteria, 114 proteins were identified, including proteins like vimentin, actin, transthyretin, apolipoprotein A-1, Heat Shock protein beta 1, vitamin D binding protein and different cytokeratins. The identified proteins are annotated to metabolic processes (36%), signal transduction (27%), cell cycle processes (15%) and trafficking/transport (9%). Using binary logistic regression, Cytokeratin 2 was found to have the strongest independent discriminatory power resulting in 90% overall correct classification.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>114 proteins were identified in supernatants from fresh cervical biopsies and many differed between CIN2 and 3. Cytokeratin 2 is the strongest discriminator with 90% overall correct classifications.</p> http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/36cervical intraepithelial neoplasiaCINproteomicsLTQ-Orbitrapmass spectrometry |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Skaland Ivar van Diermen Bianca Gudlaugsson Einar Brede Cato Munk Ane Uleberg Kai-Erik Malpica Anais Janssen Emiel AM Hjelle Anne Baak Jan PA |
spellingShingle |
Skaland Ivar van Diermen Bianca Gudlaugsson Einar Brede Cato Munk Ane Uleberg Kai-Erik Malpica Anais Janssen Emiel AM Hjelle Anne Baak Jan PA Discrimination of grade 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by means of analysis of water soluble proteins recovered from cervical biopsies Proteome Science cervical intraepithelial neoplasia CIN proteomics LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometry |
author_facet |
Skaland Ivar van Diermen Bianca Gudlaugsson Einar Brede Cato Munk Ane Uleberg Kai-Erik Malpica Anais Janssen Emiel AM Hjelle Anne Baak Jan PA |
author_sort |
Skaland Ivar |
title |
Discrimination of grade 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by means of analysis of water soluble proteins recovered from cervical biopsies |
title_short |
Discrimination of grade 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by means of analysis of water soluble proteins recovered from cervical biopsies |
title_full |
Discrimination of grade 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by means of analysis of water soluble proteins recovered from cervical biopsies |
title_fullStr |
Discrimination of grade 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by means of analysis of water soluble proteins recovered from cervical biopsies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Discrimination of grade 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by means of analysis of water soluble proteins recovered from cervical biopsies |
title_sort |
discrimination of grade 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by means of analysis of water soluble proteins recovered from cervical biopsies |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Proteome Science |
issn |
1477-5956 |
publishDate |
2011-06-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grades 2 and 3 are usually grouped and treated in the same way as "high grade", in spite of their different risk to cancer progression and spontaneous regression rates. CIN2-3 is usually diagnosed in formaldehyde-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) punch biopsies. This procedure virtually eliminates the availability of water-soluble proteins which could have diagnostic and prognostic value.</p> <p>Aim</p> <p>To investigate whether a water-soluble protein-saving biopsy processing method followed by a proteomic analysis of supernatant samples using LC-MS/MS (LTQ Orbitrap) can be used to distinguish between CIN2 and CIN3.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Fresh cervical punch biopsies from 20 women were incubated in RPMI1640 medium for 24 hours at 4°C for protein extraction and subsequently subjected to standard FFPE processing. P16 and Ki67-supported histologic consensus review CIN grade (CIN2, n = 10, CIN3, n = 10) was assessed by independent gynecological pathologists. The biopsy supernatants were depleted of 7 high abundance proteins prior to uni-dimensional LC-MS/MS analysis for protein identifications.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The age of the patients ranged from 25-40 years (median 29.7), and mean protein concentration was 0.81 mg/ml (range 0.55 - 1.14). After application of multistep identification criteria, 114 proteins were identified, including proteins like vimentin, actin, transthyretin, apolipoprotein A-1, Heat Shock protein beta 1, vitamin D binding protein and different cytokeratins. The identified proteins are annotated to metabolic processes (36%), signal transduction (27%), cell cycle processes (15%) and trafficking/transport (9%). Using binary logistic regression, Cytokeratin 2 was found to have the strongest independent discriminatory power resulting in 90% overall correct classification.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>114 proteins were identified in supernatants from fresh cervical biopsies and many differed between CIN2 and 3. Cytokeratin 2 is the strongest discriminator with 90% overall correct classifications.</p> |
topic |
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia CIN proteomics LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometry |
url |
http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/36 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT skalandivar discriminationofgrade2and3cervicalintraepithelialneoplasiabymeansofanalysisofwatersolubleproteinsrecoveredfromcervicalbiopsies AT vandiermenbianca discriminationofgrade2and3cervicalintraepithelialneoplasiabymeansofanalysisofwatersolubleproteinsrecoveredfromcervicalbiopsies AT gudlaugssoneinar discriminationofgrade2and3cervicalintraepithelialneoplasiabymeansofanalysisofwatersolubleproteinsrecoveredfromcervicalbiopsies AT bredecato discriminationofgrade2and3cervicalintraepithelialneoplasiabymeansofanalysisofwatersolubleproteinsrecoveredfromcervicalbiopsies AT munkane discriminationofgrade2and3cervicalintraepithelialneoplasiabymeansofanalysisofwatersolubleproteinsrecoveredfromcervicalbiopsies AT ulebergkaierik discriminationofgrade2and3cervicalintraepithelialneoplasiabymeansofanalysisofwatersolubleproteinsrecoveredfromcervicalbiopsies AT malpicaanais discriminationofgrade2and3cervicalintraepithelialneoplasiabymeansofanalysisofwatersolubleproteinsrecoveredfromcervicalbiopsies AT janssenemielam discriminationofgrade2and3cervicalintraepithelialneoplasiabymeansofanalysisofwatersolubleproteinsrecoveredfromcervicalbiopsies AT hjelleanne discriminationofgrade2and3cervicalintraepithelialneoplasiabymeansofanalysisofwatersolubleproteinsrecoveredfromcervicalbiopsies AT baakjanpa discriminationofgrade2and3cervicalintraepithelialneoplasiabymeansofanalysisofwatersolubleproteinsrecoveredfromcervicalbiopsies |
_version_ |
1725232274372296704 |