Further Analysis on Cumulative and Synergic Effect of Risks and Hazards on Selected Protected Object

The multi-risk and multi-hazard analysis replace the single processes analysis as a natural continuation of risk perception in risk management. The separation of hazards is substituted by pooling the hazards into the categories based on various criteria. This transition from understanding the hazard...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lenka Sivakova, Jozef Ristvej, Vendula Onderkova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 2018-09-01
Series:Chemical Engineering Transactions
Online Access:https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/8902
id doaj-59cf4da0accc4e30b0b2adc73f82efae
record_format Article
spelling doaj-59cf4da0accc4e30b0b2adc73f82efae2021-02-17T20:57:02ZengAIDIC Servizi S.r.l.Chemical Engineering Transactions2283-92162018-09-016710.3303/CET1867016Further Analysis on Cumulative and Synergic Effect of Risks and Hazards on Selected Protected ObjectLenka SivakovaJozef RistvejVendula OnderkovaThe multi-risk and multi-hazard analysis replace the single processes analysis as a natural continuation of risk perception in risk management. The separation of hazards is substituted by pooling the hazards into the categories based on various criteria. This transition from understanding the hazards as interrelated subjects raise numerous questions, for example: Based on what criteria should hazards be separated? Is it the obvious interconnection of action and reaction or should they be sorted by the risk level? In our article, we focus on description of mutual hazards' relationships that can be studied by their cascade and synergy effects if they manifest. This approach allows to consider multiplied impact of hazards manifested in some protected area. The consideration of the cascade and synergy effects illustrate the force of some particular hazard on the network of its impact. Relations are determined ad hoc, by means of estimations made by experts. Subsequently, there is calculated the average of thus obtained values and used as an activity, respectively a passivity coefficient. This way each risk connected with particular hazard is enriched with two values, which should clarify its impact. Obviously, there are two main insufficiencies. First, the usage of any estimation carries out subjectivity of experts that needs to be treated in proper way. Secondly, computing the average of given values does not include any information about the importance, meaning or weight of grouped hazards.https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/8902
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lenka Sivakova
Jozef Ristvej
Vendula Onderkova
spellingShingle Lenka Sivakova
Jozef Ristvej
Vendula Onderkova
Further Analysis on Cumulative and Synergic Effect of Risks and Hazards on Selected Protected Object
Chemical Engineering Transactions
author_facet Lenka Sivakova
Jozef Ristvej
Vendula Onderkova
author_sort Lenka Sivakova
title Further Analysis on Cumulative and Synergic Effect of Risks and Hazards on Selected Protected Object
title_short Further Analysis on Cumulative and Synergic Effect of Risks and Hazards on Selected Protected Object
title_full Further Analysis on Cumulative and Synergic Effect of Risks and Hazards on Selected Protected Object
title_fullStr Further Analysis on Cumulative and Synergic Effect of Risks and Hazards on Selected Protected Object
title_full_unstemmed Further Analysis on Cumulative and Synergic Effect of Risks and Hazards on Selected Protected Object
title_sort further analysis on cumulative and synergic effect of risks and hazards on selected protected object
publisher AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.
series Chemical Engineering Transactions
issn 2283-9216
publishDate 2018-09-01
description The multi-risk and multi-hazard analysis replace the single processes analysis as a natural continuation of risk perception in risk management. The separation of hazards is substituted by pooling the hazards into the categories based on various criteria. This transition from understanding the hazards as interrelated subjects raise numerous questions, for example: Based on what criteria should hazards be separated? Is it the obvious interconnection of action and reaction or should they be sorted by the risk level? In our article, we focus on description of mutual hazards' relationships that can be studied by their cascade and synergy effects if they manifest. This approach allows to consider multiplied impact of hazards manifested in some protected area. The consideration of the cascade and synergy effects illustrate the force of some particular hazard on the network of its impact. Relations are determined ad hoc, by means of estimations made by experts. Subsequently, there is calculated the average of thus obtained values and used as an activity, respectively a passivity coefficient. This way each risk connected with particular hazard is enriched with two values, which should clarify its impact. Obviously, there are two main insufficiencies. First, the usage of any estimation carries out subjectivity of experts that needs to be treated in proper way. Secondly, computing the average of given values does not include any information about the importance, meaning or weight of grouped hazards.
url https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/8902
work_keys_str_mv AT lenkasivakova furtheranalysisoncumulativeandsynergiceffectofrisksandhazardsonselectedprotectedobject
AT jozefristvej furtheranalysisoncumulativeandsynergiceffectofrisksandhazardsonselectedprotectedobject
AT vendulaonderkova furtheranalysisoncumulativeandsynergiceffectofrisksandhazardsonselectedprotectedobject
_version_ 1724264769087602688