Rectourinary Fistula after Radical Prostatectomy: Review of the Literature for Incidence, Etiology, and Management
Although rectourinary fistula (RUF) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is rare, it is an important issue impairing the quality of life of patients. If the RUF does not spontaneously close after colostomy, surgical closure should be considered. However, there is no standard approach and no consensus in...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2011-01-01
|
Series: | Prostate Cancer |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/629105 |
id |
doaj-59c3f076de75476aba715f4c956e7db4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-59c3f076de75476aba715f4c956e7db42020-11-24T23:01:31ZengHindawi LimitedProstate Cancer2090-31112090-312X2011-01-01201110.1155/2011/629105629105Rectourinary Fistula after Radical Prostatectomy: Review of the Literature for Incidence, Etiology, and ManagementHiroshi Kitamura0Taiji Tsukamoto1Department of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, South 1 West 16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo 060-8543, JapanDepartment of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, South 1 West 16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo 060-8543, JapanAlthough rectourinary fistula (RUF) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is rare, it is an important issue impairing the quality of life of patients. If the RUF does not spontaneously close after colostomy, surgical closure should be considered. However, there is no standard approach and no consensus in the literature. A National Center for Biotechnology Information (NVBI) PubMed search for relevant articles published between 1995 and December 2010 was performed using the medical subject headings “radical prostatectomy” and “fistula.” Articles relevant to the treatment of RUF were retained. RUF developed in 0.6% to 9% of patients after RP. Most cases required colostomy, but more than 50% of them needed surgical fistula closure thereafter. The York-Mason technique is the most common approach, and closure using a broad-based flap of rectal mucosa is recommended after excision of the RUF. New techniques using a sealant or glue are developing, but further successful reports are needed.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/629105 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hiroshi Kitamura Taiji Tsukamoto |
spellingShingle |
Hiroshi Kitamura Taiji Tsukamoto Rectourinary Fistula after Radical Prostatectomy: Review of the Literature for Incidence, Etiology, and Management Prostate Cancer |
author_facet |
Hiroshi Kitamura Taiji Tsukamoto |
author_sort |
Hiroshi Kitamura |
title |
Rectourinary Fistula after Radical Prostatectomy: Review of the Literature for Incidence, Etiology, and Management |
title_short |
Rectourinary Fistula after Radical Prostatectomy: Review of the Literature for Incidence, Etiology, and Management |
title_full |
Rectourinary Fistula after Radical Prostatectomy: Review of the Literature for Incidence, Etiology, and Management |
title_fullStr |
Rectourinary Fistula after Radical Prostatectomy: Review of the Literature for Incidence, Etiology, and Management |
title_full_unstemmed |
Rectourinary Fistula after Radical Prostatectomy: Review of the Literature for Incidence, Etiology, and Management |
title_sort |
rectourinary fistula after radical prostatectomy: review of the literature for incidence, etiology, and management |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Prostate Cancer |
issn |
2090-3111 2090-312X |
publishDate |
2011-01-01 |
description |
Although rectourinary fistula (RUF) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is rare, it is an important issue impairing the quality of life of patients. If the RUF does not spontaneously close after colostomy, surgical closure should be considered. However, there is no standard approach and no consensus in the literature. A National Center for Biotechnology Information (NVBI) PubMed search for relevant articles published between 1995 and December 2010 was performed using the medical subject headings “radical prostatectomy” and “fistula.” Articles relevant to the treatment of RUF were retained. RUF developed in 0.6% to 9% of patients after RP. Most cases required colostomy, but more than 50% of them needed surgical fistula closure thereafter. The York-Mason technique is the most common approach, and closure using a broad-based flap of rectal mucosa is recommended after excision of the RUF. New techniques using a sealant or glue are developing, but further successful reports are needed. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/629105 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hiroshikitamura rectourinaryfistulaafterradicalprostatectomyreviewoftheliteratureforincidenceetiologyandmanagement AT taijitsukamoto rectourinaryfistulaafterradicalprostatectomyreviewoftheliteratureforincidenceetiologyandmanagement |
_version_ |
1725639332539138048 |