Rectourinary Fistula after Radical Prostatectomy: Review of the Literature for Incidence, Etiology, and Management

Although rectourinary fistula (RUF) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is rare, it is an important issue impairing the quality of life of patients. If the RUF does not spontaneously close after colostomy, surgical closure should be considered. However, there is no standard approach and no consensus in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hiroshi Kitamura, Taiji Tsukamoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2011-01-01
Series:Prostate Cancer
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/629105
id doaj-59c3f076de75476aba715f4c956e7db4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-59c3f076de75476aba715f4c956e7db42020-11-24T23:01:31ZengHindawi LimitedProstate Cancer2090-31112090-312X2011-01-01201110.1155/2011/629105629105Rectourinary Fistula after Radical Prostatectomy: Review of the Literature for Incidence, Etiology, and ManagementHiroshi Kitamura0Taiji Tsukamoto1Department of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, South 1 West 16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo 060-8543, JapanDepartment of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, South 1 West 16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo 060-8543, JapanAlthough rectourinary fistula (RUF) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is rare, it is an important issue impairing the quality of life of patients. If the RUF does not spontaneously close after colostomy, surgical closure should be considered. However, there is no standard approach and no consensus in the literature. A National Center for Biotechnology Information (NVBI) PubMed search for relevant articles published between 1995 and December 2010 was performed using the medical subject headings “radical prostatectomy” and “fistula.” Articles relevant to the treatment of RUF were retained. RUF developed in 0.6% to 9% of patients after RP. Most cases required colostomy, but more than 50% of them needed surgical fistula closure thereafter. The York-Mason technique is the most common approach, and closure using a broad-based flap of rectal mucosa is recommended after excision of the RUF. New techniques using a sealant or glue are developing, but further successful reports are needed.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/629105
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hiroshi Kitamura
Taiji Tsukamoto
spellingShingle Hiroshi Kitamura
Taiji Tsukamoto
Rectourinary Fistula after Radical Prostatectomy: Review of the Literature for Incidence, Etiology, and Management
Prostate Cancer
author_facet Hiroshi Kitamura
Taiji Tsukamoto
author_sort Hiroshi Kitamura
title Rectourinary Fistula after Radical Prostatectomy: Review of the Literature for Incidence, Etiology, and Management
title_short Rectourinary Fistula after Radical Prostatectomy: Review of the Literature for Incidence, Etiology, and Management
title_full Rectourinary Fistula after Radical Prostatectomy: Review of the Literature for Incidence, Etiology, and Management
title_fullStr Rectourinary Fistula after Radical Prostatectomy: Review of the Literature for Incidence, Etiology, and Management
title_full_unstemmed Rectourinary Fistula after Radical Prostatectomy: Review of the Literature for Incidence, Etiology, and Management
title_sort rectourinary fistula after radical prostatectomy: review of the literature for incidence, etiology, and management
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Prostate Cancer
issn 2090-3111
2090-312X
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Although rectourinary fistula (RUF) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is rare, it is an important issue impairing the quality of life of patients. If the RUF does not spontaneously close after colostomy, surgical closure should be considered. However, there is no standard approach and no consensus in the literature. A National Center for Biotechnology Information (NVBI) PubMed search for relevant articles published between 1995 and December 2010 was performed using the medical subject headings “radical prostatectomy” and “fistula.” Articles relevant to the treatment of RUF were retained. RUF developed in 0.6% to 9% of patients after RP. Most cases required colostomy, but more than 50% of them needed surgical fistula closure thereafter. The York-Mason technique is the most common approach, and closure using a broad-based flap of rectal mucosa is recommended after excision of the RUF. New techniques using a sealant or glue are developing, but further successful reports are needed.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/629105
work_keys_str_mv AT hiroshikitamura rectourinaryfistulaafterradicalprostatectomyreviewoftheliteratureforincidenceetiologyandmanagement
AT taijitsukamoto rectourinaryfistulaafterradicalprostatectomyreviewoftheliteratureforincidenceetiologyandmanagement
_version_ 1725639332539138048