Use of evidence in policy making in South Africa: An exploratory study of attitudes of senior government officials

This paper outlines a 2011 study commissioned by the Presidency’s Programme to Support Pro-Poor Policy Development (PSPPD) which promotes evidence-based policy making (EBPM) in South Africa. EBPM refers to norms, initiatives and methods aimed at improving evidence-based policy in countries from whic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gemma Paine Cronin, Mastoera Sadan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2015-09-01
Series:African Evaluation Journal
Online Access:https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/145
id doaj-59b74f2d7c97448b93ec96fafabcdce0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-59b74f2d7c97448b93ec96fafabcdce02020-11-24T22:08:55ZengAOSISAfrican Evaluation Journal2310-49882306-51332015-09-0131e1e1010.4102/aej.v3i1.14539Use of evidence in policy making in South Africa: An exploratory study of attitudes of senior government officialsGemma Paine Cronin0Mastoera Sadan1Organisation and Strategy Development, Design and Evaluation ServicesProgramme to Support Pro-Poor Policy Development, National Planning CommissionThis paper outlines a 2011 study commissioned by the Presidency’s Programme to Support Pro-Poor Policy Development (PSPPD) which promotes evidence-based policy making (EBPM) in South Africa. EBPM refers to norms, initiatives and methods aimed at improving evidence-based policy in countries from which South Africa traditionally borrows public service reforms, particularly the UK and Canada. The study provides a descriptive snapshot of attitudes to evidence-use in policy making. All 54 senior government officials interviewed felt that evidence-use is too limited to ensure relevant, effective policy responses. This includes policies on which complex results depend and those with long-term and high-resource implications. Although all respondents regarded EBPM as self-evidently desirable, there were different views on practical application. Examples provided suggest that, where evidence was used, it was very often related to a borrowed international policy without a prior evidencedrivenanalysis of successes and failures or its relevance and feasibility in terms of local issuesand context. Policy makers generally know they should be making optimal use of availableevidence, but highlighted systemic barriers beyond the influence of individual managersto resolve. The study suggests that improved use of evidence throughout the policy cycle,particularly in analysing problems and needs, is a requirement for learning through evidencebased policy development. It suggests that political and administrative leadership will need to agree on norms, ways of dealing with the barriers to effective use of evidence and on the role of each throughout the policy cycle in ensuring appropriate evidence is available and used.https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/145
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gemma Paine Cronin
Mastoera Sadan
spellingShingle Gemma Paine Cronin
Mastoera Sadan
Use of evidence in policy making in South Africa: An exploratory study of attitudes of senior government officials
African Evaluation Journal
author_facet Gemma Paine Cronin
Mastoera Sadan
author_sort Gemma Paine Cronin
title Use of evidence in policy making in South Africa: An exploratory study of attitudes of senior government officials
title_short Use of evidence in policy making in South Africa: An exploratory study of attitudes of senior government officials
title_full Use of evidence in policy making in South Africa: An exploratory study of attitudes of senior government officials
title_fullStr Use of evidence in policy making in South Africa: An exploratory study of attitudes of senior government officials
title_full_unstemmed Use of evidence in policy making in South Africa: An exploratory study of attitudes of senior government officials
title_sort use of evidence in policy making in south africa: an exploratory study of attitudes of senior government officials
publisher AOSIS
series African Evaluation Journal
issn 2310-4988
2306-5133
publishDate 2015-09-01
description This paper outlines a 2011 study commissioned by the Presidency’s Programme to Support Pro-Poor Policy Development (PSPPD) which promotes evidence-based policy making (EBPM) in South Africa. EBPM refers to norms, initiatives and methods aimed at improving evidence-based policy in countries from which South Africa traditionally borrows public service reforms, particularly the UK and Canada. The study provides a descriptive snapshot of attitudes to evidence-use in policy making. All 54 senior government officials interviewed felt that evidence-use is too limited to ensure relevant, effective policy responses. This includes policies on which complex results depend and those with long-term and high-resource implications. Although all respondents regarded EBPM as self-evidently desirable, there were different views on practical application. Examples provided suggest that, where evidence was used, it was very often related to a borrowed international policy without a prior evidencedrivenanalysis of successes and failures or its relevance and feasibility in terms of local issuesand context. Policy makers generally know they should be making optimal use of availableevidence, but highlighted systemic barriers beyond the influence of individual managersto resolve. The study suggests that improved use of evidence throughout the policy cycle,particularly in analysing problems and needs, is a requirement for learning through evidencebased policy development. It suggests that political and administrative leadership will need to agree on norms, ways of dealing with the barriers to effective use of evidence and on the role of each throughout the policy cycle in ensuring appropriate evidence is available and used.
url https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/145
work_keys_str_mv AT gemmapainecronin useofevidenceinpolicymakinginsouthafricaanexploratorystudyofattitudesofseniorgovernmentofficials
AT mastoerasadan useofevidenceinpolicymakinginsouthafricaanexploratorystudyofattitudesofseniorgovernmentofficials
_version_ 1725813866891313152