The Cultural Politics of Ethnic Identity in Xishuangbanna, China: Tea and Rubber as “Cash Crops” and “Commodities”

In 2003, the poverty alleviation bureau in Xishuangbanna, China, introduced tea and rubber as cash crops to raise the incomes of ethnic-minority farmers who were thought to be backward and unfamiliar with markets. Using Marx’s commodity fetish and Polly Hill’s critique of “cash crops”, this paper an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Janet C. Sturgeon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2012-01-01
Series:Journal of Current Chinese Affairs
Subjects:
tea
300
Online Access:http://hup.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/jcca/article/view/576
id doaj-59b19b21e93a4d6b9c93b5a8940c570d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-59b19b21e93a4d6b9c93b5a8940c570d2020-11-25T02:48:08ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Current Chinese Affairs1868-10261868-48742012-01-01414109131The Cultural Politics of Ethnic Identity in Xishuangbanna, China: Tea and Rubber as “Cash Crops” and “Commodities”Janet C. SturgeonIn 2003, the poverty alleviation bureau in Xishuangbanna, China, introduced tea and rubber as cash crops to raise the incomes of ethnic-minority farmers who were thought to be backward and unfamiliar with markets. Using Marx’s commodity fetish and Polly Hill’s critique of “cash crops”, this paper analyses the cultural politics of ethnicity for Akha and Dai farmers in relation to tea and rubber. When the prefecture government introduces “cash crops”, the state retains its authority as the dispenser of knowledge, crops and modernity. When tea and rubber become commodities, however, some of the symbolic value of the commodity seems to stick to farmers, making rubber farmers “modern” and tea farmers “ethnic” in new ways. Through rising incomes and enhanced identities, Akha and Dai farmers unsettle stereotypes of themselves as “backward”. As a result of income levels matching those of urban middle-class residents, rubber farmers even challenge the prevalent social hierarchy.http://hup.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/jcca/article/view/576Social sciencesChinarubberteaminoritiesXishuangbannacultural politics300ChinaContemporary
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Janet C. Sturgeon
spellingShingle Janet C. Sturgeon
The Cultural Politics of Ethnic Identity in Xishuangbanna, China: Tea and Rubber as “Cash Crops” and “Commodities”
Journal of Current Chinese Affairs
Social sciences
China
rubber
tea
minorities
Xishuangbanna
cultural politics
300
China
Contemporary
author_facet Janet C. Sturgeon
author_sort Janet C. Sturgeon
title The Cultural Politics of Ethnic Identity in Xishuangbanna, China: Tea and Rubber as “Cash Crops” and “Commodities”
title_short The Cultural Politics of Ethnic Identity in Xishuangbanna, China: Tea and Rubber as “Cash Crops” and “Commodities”
title_full The Cultural Politics of Ethnic Identity in Xishuangbanna, China: Tea and Rubber as “Cash Crops” and “Commodities”
title_fullStr The Cultural Politics of Ethnic Identity in Xishuangbanna, China: Tea and Rubber as “Cash Crops” and “Commodities”
title_full_unstemmed The Cultural Politics of Ethnic Identity in Xishuangbanna, China: Tea and Rubber as “Cash Crops” and “Commodities”
title_sort cultural politics of ethnic identity in xishuangbanna, china: tea and rubber as “cash crops” and “commodities”
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Current Chinese Affairs
issn 1868-1026
1868-4874
publishDate 2012-01-01
description In 2003, the poverty alleviation bureau in Xishuangbanna, China, introduced tea and rubber as cash crops to raise the incomes of ethnic-minority farmers who were thought to be backward and unfamiliar with markets. Using Marx’s commodity fetish and Polly Hill’s critique of “cash crops”, this paper analyses the cultural politics of ethnicity for Akha and Dai farmers in relation to tea and rubber. When the prefecture government introduces “cash crops”, the state retains its authority as the dispenser of knowledge, crops and modernity. When tea and rubber become commodities, however, some of the symbolic value of the commodity seems to stick to farmers, making rubber farmers “modern” and tea farmers “ethnic” in new ways. Through rising incomes and enhanced identities, Akha and Dai farmers unsettle stereotypes of themselves as “backward”. As a result of income levels matching those of urban middle-class residents, rubber farmers even challenge the prevalent social hierarchy.
topic Social sciences
China
rubber
tea
minorities
Xishuangbanna
cultural politics
300
China
Contemporary
url http://hup.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/jcca/article/view/576
work_keys_str_mv AT janetcsturgeon theculturalpoliticsofethnicidentityinxishuangbannachinateaandrubberascashcropsandcommodities
AT janetcsturgeon culturalpoliticsofethnicidentityinxishuangbannachinateaandrubberascashcropsandcommodities
_version_ 1724749595393654784