The Cultural Politics of Ethnic Identity in Xishuangbanna, China: Tea and Rubber as “Cash Crops” and “Commodities”
In 2003, the poverty alleviation bureau in Xishuangbanna, China, introduced tea and rubber as cash crops to raise the incomes of ethnic-minority farmers who were thought to be backward and unfamiliar with markets. Using Marx’s commodity fetish and Polly Hill’s critique of “cash crops”, this paper an...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2012-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Current Chinese Affairs |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hup.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/jcca/article/view/576 |
id |
doaj-59b19b21e93a4d6b9c93b5a8940c570d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-59b19b21e93a4d6b9c93b5a8940c570d2020-11-25T02:48:08ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Current Chinese Affairs1868-10261868-48742012-01-01414109131The Cultural Politics of Ethnic Identity in Xishuangbanna, China: Tea and Rubber as “Cash Crops” and “Commodities”Janet C. SturgeonIn 2003, the poverty alleviation bureau in Xishuangbanna, China, introduced tea and rubber as cash crops to raise the incomes of ethnic-minority farmers who were thought to be backward and unfamiliar with markets. Using Marx’s commodity fetish and Polly Hill’s critique of “cash crops”, this paper analyses the cultural politics of ethnicity for Akha and Dai farmers in relation to tea and rubber. When the prefecture government introduces “cash crops”, the state retains its authority as the dispenser of knowledge, crops and modernity. When tea and rubber become commodities, however, some of the symbolic value of the commodity seems to stick to farmers, making rubber farmers “modern” and tea farmers “ethnic” in new ways. Through rising incomes and enhanced identities, Akha and Dai farmers unsettle stereotypes of themselves as “backward”. As a result of income levels matching those of urban middle-class residents, rubber farmers even challenge the prevalent social hierarchy.http://hup.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/jcca/article/view/576Social sciencesChinarubberteaminoritiesXishuangbannacultural politics300ChinaContemporary |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Janet C. Sturgeon |
spellingShingle |
Janet C. Sturgeon The Cultural Politics of Ethnic Identity in Xishuangbanna, China: Tea and Rubber as “Cash Crops” and “Commodities” Journal of Current Chinese Affairs Social sciences China rubber tea minorities Xishuangbanna cultural politics 300 China Contemporary |
author_facet |
Janet C. Sturgeon |
author_sort |
Janet C. Sturgeon |
title |
The Cultural Politics of Ethnic Identity in Xishuangbanna, China: Tea and Rubber as “Cash Crops” and “Commodities” |
title_short |
The Cultural Politics of Ethnic Identity in Xishuangbanna, China: Tea and Rubber as “Cash Crops” and “Commodities” |
title_full |
The Cultural Politics of Ethnic Identity in Xishuangbanna, China: Tea and Rubber as “Cash Crops” and “Commodities” |
title_fullStr |
The Cultural Politics of Ethnic Identity in Xishuangbanna, China: Tea and Rubber as “Cash Crops” and “Commodities” |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Cultural Politics of Ethnic Identity in Xishuangbanna, China: Tea and Rubber as “Cash Crops” and “Commodities” |
title_sort |
cultural politics of ethnic identity in xishuangbanna, china: tea and rubber as “cash crops” and “commodities” |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Journal of Current Chinese Affairs |
issn |
1868-1026 1868-4874 |
publishDate |
2012-01-01 |
description |
In 2003, the poverty alleviation bureau in Xishuangbanna, China, introduced tea and rubber as cash crops to raise the incomes of ethnic-minority farmers who were thought to be backward and unfamiliar with markets. Using Marx’s commodity fetish and Polly Hill’s critique of “cash crops”, this paper analyses the cultural politics of ethnicity for Akha and Dai farmers in relation to tea and rubber. When the prefecture government introduces “cash crops”, the state retains its authority as the dispenser of knowledge, crops and modernity. When tea and rubber become commodities, however, some of the symbolic value of the commodity seems to stick to farmers, making rubber farmers “modern” and tea farmers “ethnic” in new ways. Through rising incomes and enhanced identities, Akha and Dai farmers unsettle stereotypes of themselves as “backward”. As a result of income levels matching those of urban middle-class residents, rubber farmers even challenge the prevalent social hierarchy. |
topic |
Social sciences China rubber tea minorities Xishuangbanna cultural politics 300 China Contemporary |
url |
http://hup.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/jcca/article/view/576 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT janetcsturgeon theculturalpoliticsofethnicidentityinxishuangbannachinateaandrubberascashcropsandcommodities AT janetcsturgeon culturalpoliticsofethnicidentityinxishuangbannachinateaandrubberascashcropsandcommodities |
_version_ |
1724749595393654784 |