Comparing speaking situations in three different language tests

<p><span>The purpose of this study was to compare learner outcome when five similar speaking situations were offered in the speaking subtest in Finnish, Swedish and English intermediate level tests in the Finnish National Certificates language testing system. The overall aim was to inves...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sari Ahola, Tiina Lammervo, Reeta Neittaanmäki, Sari Ohranen, Henna Tossavainen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühing (Estonian Association for Applied Linguistics) 2013-04-01
Series:Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.rakenduslingvistika.ee/ajakirjad/index.php/aastaraamat/article/view/209
id doaj-59afe13e269646088133054a9aa1d310
record_format Article
spelling doaj-59afe13e269646088133054a9aa1d3102020-11-24T22:50:43ZengEesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühing (Estonian Association for Applied Linguistics)Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat1736-25632013-04-010910.5128/ERYa9.01Comparing speaking situations in three different language testsSari AholaTiina LammervoReeta NeittaanmäkiSari OhranenHenna Tossavainen<p><span>The purpose of this study was to compare learner outcome when five similar speaking situations were offered in the speaking subtest in Finnish, Swedish and English intermediate level tests in the Finnish National Certificates language testing system. The overall aim was to investigate the tasks by comparing learner outcomes across the three tests and to seek explanations for the outcome in the learners’ selfreported demographic, language, educational and professional background.</span></p><p><span>The speaking situations were selected from the NC item bank meaning that they have undergone the Item Response Theory based analyses which indicate that the tasks function well in all tests. More information was needed to discover possible connections between performance and background information. Performance data and background factors were analysed using descriptive frequency and percent distribution. Cross-tabulation was used to analyse connections between variables. The tasks are discussed in terms of domains and language functions and their connection with the test takers’ background information. Results indicate that though there is some variation in the learner outcomes across languages, situational tasks can be used for different languages.</span></p><p><span><span><span>DOI: http://dx.doi.org/</span>10.5128/ERYa9.01</span><br /></span></p>http://www.rakenduslingvistika.ee/ajakirjad/index.php/aastaraamat/article/view/209second and foreign language testing, spoken language, validity, Finnish, Swedish, English tests
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sari Ahola
Tiina Lammervo
Reeta Neittaanmäki
Sari Ohranen
Henna Tossavainen
spellingShingle Sari Ahola
Tiina Lammervo
Reeta Neittaanmäki
Sari Ohranen
Henna Tossavainen
Comparing speaking situations in three different language tests
Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat
second and foreign language testing, spoken language, validity, Finnish, Swedish, English tests
author_facet Sari Ahola
Tiina Lammervo
Reeta Neittaanmäki
Sari Ohranen
Henna Tossavainen
author_sort Sari Ahola
title Comparing speaking situations in three different language tests
title_short Comparing speaking situations in three different language tests
title_full Comparing speaking situations in three different language tests
title_fullStr Comparing speaking situations in three different language tests
title_full_unstemmed Comparing speaking situations in three different language tests
title_sort comparing speaking situations in three different language tests
publisher Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühing (Estonian Association for Applied Linguistics)
series Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat
issn 1736-2563
publishDate 2013-04-01
description <p><span>The purpose of this study was to compare learner outcome when five similar speaking situations were offered in the speaking subtest in Finnish, Swedish and English intermediate level tests in the Finnish National Certificates language testing system. The overall aim was to investigate the tasks by comparing learner outcomes across the three tests and to seek explanations for the outcome in the learners’ selfreported demographic, language, educational and professional background.</span></p><p><span>The speaking situations were selected from the NC item bank meaning that they have undergone the Item Response Theory based analyses which indicate that the tasks function well in all tests. More information was needed to discover possible connections between performance and background information. Performance data and background factors were analysed using descriptive frequency and percent distribution. Cross-tabulation was used to analyse connections between variables. The tasks are discussed in terms of domains and language functions and their connection with the test takers’ background information. Results indicate that though there is some variation in the learner outcomes across languages, situational tasks can be used for different languages.</span></p><p><span><span><span>DOI: http://dx.doi.org/</span>10.5128/ERYa9.01</span><br /></span></p>
topic second and foreign language testing, spoken language, validity, Finnish, Swedish, English tests
url http://www.rakenduslingvistika.ee/ajakirjad/index.php/aastaraamat/article/view/209
work_keys_str_mv AT sariahola comparingspeakingsituationsinthreedifferentlanguagetests
AT tiinalammervo comparingspeakingsituationsinthreedifferentlanguagetests
AT reetaneittaanmaki comparingspeakingsituationsinthreedifferentlanguagetests
AT sariohranen comparingspeakingsituationsinthreedifferentlanguagetests
AT hennatossavainen comparingspeakingsituationsinthreedifferentlanguagetests
_version_ 1725671536895983616