Comparing speaking situations in three different language tests
<p><span>The purpose of this study was to compare learner outcome when five similar speaking situations were offered in the speaking subtest in Finnish, Swedish and English intermediate level tests in the Finnish National Certificates language testing system. The overall aim was to inves...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühing (Estonian Association for Applied Linguistics)
2013-04-01
|
Series: | Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.rakenduslingvistika.ee/ajakirjad/index.php/aastaraamat/article/view/209 |
id |
doaj-59afe13e269646088133054a9aa1d310 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-59afe13e269646088133054a9aa1d3102020-11-24T22:50:43ZengEesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühing (Estonian Association for Applied Linguistics)Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat1736-25632013-04-010910.5128/ERYa9.01Comparing speaking situations in three different language testsSari AholaTiina LammervoReeta NeittaanmäkiSari OhranenHenna Tossavainen<p><span>The purpose of this study was to compare learner outcome when five similar speaking situations were offered in the speaking subtest in Finnish, Swedish and English intermediate level tests in the Finnish National Certificates language testing system. The overall aim was to investigate the tasks by comparing learner outcomes across the three tests and to seek explanations for the outcome in the learners’ selfreported demographic, language, educational and professional background.</span></p><p><span>The speaking situations were selected from the NC item bank meaning that they have undergone the Item Response Theory based analyses which indicate that the tasks function well in all tests. More information was needed to discover possible connections between performance and background information. Performance data and background factors were analysed using descriptive frequency and percent distribution. Cross-tabulation was used to analyse connections between variables. The tasks are discussed in terms of domains and language functions and their connection with the test takers’ background information. Results indicate that though there is some variation in the learner outcomes across languages, situational tasks can be used for different languages.</span></p><p><span><span><span>DOI: http://dx.doi.org/</span>10.5128/ERYa9.01</span><br /></span></p>http://www.rakenduslingvistika.ee/ajakirjad/index.php/aastaraamat/article/view/209second and foreign language testing, spoken language, validity, Finnish, Swedish, English tests |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sari Ahola Tiina Lammervo Reeta Neittaanmäki Sari Ohranen Henna Tossavainen |
spellingShingle |
Sari Ahola Tiina Lammervo Reeta Neittaanmäki Sari Ohranen Henna Tossavainen Comparing speaking situations in three different language tests Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat second and foreign language testing, spoken language, validity, Finnish, Swedish, English tests |
author_facet |
Sari Ahola Tiina Lammervo Reeta Neittaanmäki Sari Ohranen Henna Tossavainen |
author_sort |
Sari Ahola |
title |
Comparing speaking situations in three different language tests |
title_short |
Comparing speaking situations in three different language tests |
title_full |
Comparing speaking situations in three different language tests |
title_fullStr |
Comparing speaking situations in three different language tests |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing speaking situations in three different language tests |
title_sort |
comparing speaking situations in three different language tests |
publisher |
Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühing (Estonian Association for Applied Linguistics) |
series |
Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat |
issn |
1736-2563 |
publishDate |
2013-04-01 |
description |
<p><span>The purpose of this study was to compare learner outcome when five similar speaking situations were offered in the speaking subtest in Finnish, Swedish and English intermediate level tests in the Finnish National Certificates language testing system. The overall aim was to investigate the tasks by comparing learner outcomes across the three tests and to seek explanations for the outcome in the learners’ selfreported demographic, language, educational and professional background.</span></p><p><span>The speaking situations were selected from the NC item bank meaning that they have undergone the Item Response Theory based analyses which indicate that the tasks function well in all tests. More information was needed to discover possible connections between performance and background information. Performance data and background factors were analysed using descriptive frequency and percent distribution. Cross-tabulation was used to analyse connections between variables. The tasks are discussed in terms of domains and language functions and their connection with the test takers’ background information. Results indicate that though there is some variation in the learner outcomes across languages, situational tasks can be used for different languages.</span></p><p><span><span><span>DOI: http://dx.doi.org/</span>10.5128/ERYa9.01</span><br /></span></p> |
topic |
second and foreign language testing, spoken language, validity, Finnish, Swedish, English tests |
url |
http://www.rakenduslingvistika.ee/ajakirjad/index.php/aastaraamat/article/view/209 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sariahola comparingspeakingsituationsinthreedifferentlanguagetests AT tiinalammervo comparingspeakingsituationsinthreedifferentlanguagetests AT reetaneittaanmaki comparingspeakingsituationsinthreedifferentlanguagetests AT sariohranen comparingspeakingsituationsinthreedifferentlanguagetests AT hennatossavainen comparingspeakingsituationsinthreedifferentlanguagetests |
_version_ |
1725671536895983616 |