Deep Analysis of Process Model Matching Techniques
Process Model Matching (PMM) aims to automatically identify corresponding activities from two process models that exhibit similar behaviors. Recognizing the diverse applications of process model matching, several techniques have been proposed in the literature. Typically, the effectiveness of these...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
IEEE
2020-01-01
|
Series: | IEEE Access |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9099282/ |
id |
doaj-59af4b89b807449a9739b95da627f009 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-59af4b89b807449a9739b95da627f0092021-03-30T02:32:21ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362020-01-018992399925310.1109/ACCESS.2020.29970979099282Deep Analysis of Process Model Matching TechniquesMuhammad Ali0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9336-043XKhurram Shahzad1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8433-6705Syed Irtaza Muzaffar2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5364-051XMuhammad Kamran Malik3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1392-8866Punjab University College of Information Technology (PUCIT), University of the Punjab, Lahore, PakistanPunjab University College of Information Technology (PUCIT), University of the Punjab, Lahore, PakistanPunjab University College of Information Technology (PUCIT), University of the Punjab, Lahore, PakistanPunjab University College of Information Technology (PUCIT), University of the Punjab, Lahore, PakistanProcess Model Matching (PMM) aims to automatically identify corresponding activities from two process models that exhibit similar behaviors. Recognizing the diverse applications of process model matching, several techniques have been proposed in the literature. Typically, the effectiveness of these matching techniques has been evaluated using three widely used performance measures, Precision, Recall, and F1 score. In this study, we have established that the values of these three measures for each dataset do not provide deeper insights into the capabilities of the matching techniques. To that end, we have made three significant contributions. Firstly, we have enhanced four benchmark datasets by classifying their corresponding activities into three sub-types. The enhanced datasets can be used for surface-level evaluation, as well as a deeper evaluation of matching techniques. Secondly, we have conducted a systematic search of the literature to identify an extensive set of 27 matching techniques and subsequently proposed a taxonomy for these matching techniques. Finally, we have performed 432 experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of all the matching techniques, and key observations about the effectiveness of the techniques are presented.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9099282/Business process managementdeveloping benchmarkstaxonomytext matching |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Muhammad Ali Khurram Shahzad Syed Irtaza Muzaffar Muhammad Kamran Malik |
spellingShingle |
Muhammad Ali Khurram Shahzad Syed Irtaza Muzaffar Muhammad Kamran Malik Deep Analysis of Process Model Matching Techniques IEEE Access Business process management developing benchmarks taxonomy text matching |
author_facet |
Muhammad Ali Khurram Shahzad Syed Irtaza Muzaffar Muhammad Kamran Malik |
author_sort |
Muhammad Ali |
title |
Deep Analysis of Process Model Matching Techniques |
title_short |
Deep Analysis of Process Model Matching Techniques |
title_full |
Deep Analysis of Process Model Matching Techniques |
title_fullStr |
Deep Analysis of Process Model Matching Techniques |
title_full_unstemmed |
Deep Analysis of Process Model Matching Techniques |
title_sort |
deep analysis of process model matching techniques |
publisher |
IEEE |
series |
IEEE Access |
issn |
2169-3536 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Process Model Matching (PMM) aims to automatically identify corresponding activities from two process models that exhibit similar behaviors. Recognizing the diverse applications of process model matching, several techniques have been proposed in the literature. Typically, the effectiveness of these matching techniques has been evaluated using three widely used performance measures, Precision, Recall, and F1 score. In this study, we have established that the values of these three measures for each dataset do not provide deeper insights into the capabilities of the matching techniques. To that end, we have made three significant contributions. Firstly, we have enhanced four benchmark datasets by classifying their corresponding activities into three sub-types. The enhanced datasets can be used for surface-level evaluation, as well as a deeper evaluation of matching techniques. Secondly, we have conducted a systematic search of the literature to identify an extensive set of 27 matching techniques and subsequently proposed a taxonomy for these matching techniques. Finally, we have performed 432 experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of all the matching techniques, and key observations about the effectiveness of the techniques are presented. |
topic |
Business process management developing benchmarks taxonomy text matching |
url |
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9099282/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT muhammadali deepanalysisofprocessmodelmatchingtechniques AT khurramshahzad deepanalysisofprocessmodelmatchingtechniques AT syedirtazamuzaffar deepanalysisofprocessmodelmatchingtechniques AT muhammadkamranmalik deepanalysisofprocessmodelmatchingtechniques |
_version_ |
1724184958467047424 |