Differences in topological progression profile among neurodegenerative diseases from imaging data

The spatial distribution of atrophy in neurodegenerative diseases suggests that brain connectivity mediates disease propagation. Different descriptors of the connectivity graph potentially relate to different underlying mechanisms of propagation. Previous approaches for evaluating the influence of c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sara Garbarino, Marco Lorenzi, Neil P Oxtoby, Elisabeth J Vinke, Razvan V Marinescu, Arman Eshaghi, M Arfan Ikram, Wiro J Niessen, Olga Ciccarelli, Frederik Barkhof, Jonathan M Schott, Meike W Vernooij, Daniel C Alexander, for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eLife Sciences Publications Ltd 2019-12-01
Series:eLife
Subjects:
Online Access:https://elifesciences.org/articles/49298
id doaj-59ad7488523a4adcbc229c1e872cf623
record_format Article
spelling doaj-59ad7488523a4adcbc229c1e872cf6232021-05-05T18:11:04ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2019-12-01810.7554/eLife.49298Differences in topological progression profile among neurodegenerative diseases from imaging dataSara Garbarino0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3583-3630Marco Lorenzi1Neil P Oxtoby2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0203-3909Elisabeth J Vinke3Razvan V Marinescu4Arman Eshaghi5M Arfan Ikram6Wiro J Niessen7Olga Ciccarelli8Frederik Barkhof9https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3543-3706Jonathan M Schott10Meike W Vernooij11Daniel C Alexander12for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeCentre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Université Côte d’Azur, Inria, Epione Research Project, Sophia Antipolis, FranceUniversité Côte d’Azur, Inria, Epione Research Project, Sophia Antipolis, FranceCentre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United KingdomDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, NetherlandsCentre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United KingdomCentre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, United KingdomDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, NetherlandsQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, United KingdomCentre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, VUmc, Amsterdam, NetherlandsDementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United KingdomDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, NetherlandsCentre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United KingdomThe spatial distribution of atrophy in neurodegenerative diseases suggests that brain connectivity mediates disease propagation. Different descriptors of the connectivity graph potentially relate to different underlying mechanisms of propagation. Previous approaches for evaluating the influence of connectivity on neurodegeneration consider each descriptor in isolation and match predictions against late-stage atrophy patterns. We introduce the notion of a topological profile — a characteristic combination of topological descriptors that best describes the propagation of pathology in a particular disease. By drawing on recent advances in disease progression modeling, we estimate topological profiles from the full course of pathology accumulation, at both cohort and individual levels. Experimental results comparing topological profiles for Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis and normal ageing show that topological profiles explain the observed data better than single descriptors. Within each condition, most individual profiles cluster around the cohort-level profile, and individuals whose profiles align more closely with other cohort-level profiles show features of that cohort. The cohort-level profiles suggest new insights into the biological mechanisms underlying pathology propagation in each disease.https://elifesciences.org/articles/49298neurodegenerationalzheimer's diseaseageingmultiple sclerosisdisease progression modellingconnectivity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sara Garbarino
Marco Lorenzi
Neil P Oxtoby
Elisabeth J Vinke
Razvan V Marinescu
Arman Eshaghi
M Arfan Ikram
Wiro J Niessen
Olga Ciccarelli
Frederik Barkhof
Jonathan M Schott
Meike W Vernooij
Daniel C Alexander
for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
spellingShingle Sara Garbarino
Marco Lorenzi
Neil P Oxtoby
Elisabeth J Vinke
Razvan V Marinescu
Arman Eshaghi
M Arfan Ikram
Wiro J Niessen
Olga Ciccarelli
Frederik Barkhof
Jonathan M Schott
Meike W Vernooij
Daniel C Alexander
for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Differences in topological progression profile among neurodegenerative diseases from imaging data
eLife
neurodegeneration
alzheimer's disease
ageing
multiple sclerosis
disease progression modelling
connectivity
author_facet Sara Garbarino
Marco Lorenzi
Neil P Oxtoby
Elisabeth J Vinke
Razvan V Marinescu
Arman Eshaghi
M Arfan Ikram
Wiro J Niessen
Olga Ciccarelli
Frederik Barkhof
Jonathan M Schott
Meike W Vernooij
Daniel C Alexander
for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
author_sort Sara Garbarino
title Differences in topological progression profile among neurodegenerative diseases from imaging data
title_short Differences in topological progression profile among neurodegenerative diseases from imaging data
title_full Differences in topological progression profile among neurodegenerative diseases from imaging data
title_fullStr Differences in topological progression profile among neurodegenerative diseases from imaging data
title_full_unstemmed Differences in topological progression profile among neurodegenerative diseases from imaging data
title_sort differences in topological progression profile among neurodegenerative diseases from imaging data
publisher eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
series eLife
issn 2050-084X
publishDate 2019-12-01
description The spatial distribution of atrophy in neurodegenerative diseases suggests that brain connectivity mediates disease propagation. Different descriptors of the connectivity graph potentially relate to different underlying mechanisms of propagation. Previous approaches for evaluating the influence of connectivity on neurodegeneration consider each descriptor in isolation and match predictions against late-stage atrophy patterns. We introduce the notion of a topological profile — a characteristic combination of topological descriptors that best describes the propagation of pathology in a particular disease. By drawing on recent advances in disease progression modeling, we estimate topological profiles from the full course of pathology accumulation, at both cohort and individual levels. Experimental results comparing topological profiles for Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis and normal ageing show that topological profiles explain the observed data better than single descriptors. Within each condition, most individual profiles cluster around the cohort-level profile, and individuals whose profiles align more closely with other cohort-level profiles show features of that cohort. The cohort-level profiles suggest new insights into the biological mechanisms underlying pathology propagation in each disease.
topic neurodegeneration
alzheimer's disease
ageing
multiple sclerosis
disease progression modelling
connectivity
url https://elifesciences.org/articles/49298
work_keys_str_mv AT saragarbarino differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata
AT marcolorenzi differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata
AT neilpoxtoby differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata
AT elisabethjvinke differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata
AT razvanvmarinescu differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata
AT armaneshaghi differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata
AT marfanikram differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata
AT wirojniessen differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata
AT olgaciccarelli differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata
AT frederikbarkhof differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata
AT jonathanmschott differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata
AT meikewvernooij differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata
AT danielcalexander differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata
AT forthealzheimersdiseaseneuroimaginginitiative differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata
_version_ 1721458735007662080