Differences in topological progression profile among neurodegenerative diseases from imaging data
The spatial distribution of atrophy in neurodegenerative diseases suggests that brain connectivity mediates disease propagation. Different descriptors of the connectivity graph potentially relate to different underlying mechanisms of propagation. Previous approaches for evaluating the influence of c...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
2019-12-01
|
Series: | eLife |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://elifesciences.org/articles/49298 |
id |
doaj-59ad7488523a4adcbc229c1e872cf623 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-59ad7488523a4adcbc229c1e872cf6232021-05-05T18:11:04ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2019-12-01810.7554/eLife.49298Differences in topological progression profile among neurodegenerative diseases from imaging dataSara Garbarino0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3583-3630Marco Lorenzi1Neil P Oxtoby2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0203-3909Elisabeth J Vinke3Razvan V Marinescu4Arman Eshaghi5M Arfan Ikram6Wiro J Niessen7Olga Ciccarelli8Frederik Barkhof9https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3543-3706Jonathan M Schott10Meike W Vernooij11Daniel C Alexander12for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeCentre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Université Côte d’Azur, Inria, Epione Research Project, Sophia Antipolis, FranceUniversité Côte d’Azur, Inria, Epione Research Project, Sophia Antipolis, FranceCentre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United KingdomDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, NetherlandsCentre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United KingdomCentre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, United KingdomDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, NetherlandsQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, United KingdomCentre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, VUmc, Amsterdam, NetherlandsDementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United KingdomDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, NetherlandsCentre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United KingdomThe spatial distribution of atrophy in neurodegenerative diseases suggests that brain connectivity mediates disease propagation. Different descriptors of the connectivity graph potentially relate to different underlying mechanisms of propagation. Previous approaches for evaluating the influence of connectivity on neurodegeneration consider each descriptor in isolation and match predictions against late-stage atrophy patterns. We introduce the notion of a topological profile — a characteristic combination of topological descriptors that best describes the propagation of pathology in a particular disease. By drawing on recent advances in disease progression modeling, we estimate topological profiles from the full course of pathology accumulation, at both cohort and individual levels. Experimental results comparing topological profiles for Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis and normal ageing show that topological profiles explain the observed data better than single descriptors. Within each condition, most individual profiles cluster around the cohort-level profile, and individuals whose profiles align more closely with other cohort-level profiles show features of that cohort. The cohort-level profiles suggest new insights into the biological mechanisms underlying pathology propagation in each disease.https://elifesciences.org/articles/49298neurodegenerationalzheimer's diseaseageingmultiple sclerosisdisease progression modellingconnectivity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sara Garbarino Marco Lorenzi Neil P Oxtoby Elisabeth J Vinke Razvan V Marinescu Arman Eshaghi M Arfan Ikram Wiro J Niessen Olga Ciccarelli Frederik Barkhof Jonathan M Schott Meike W Vernooij Daniel C Alexander for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative |
spellingShingle |
Sara Garbarino Marco Lorenzi Neil P Oxtoby Elisabeth J Vinke Razvan V Marinescu Arman Eshaghi M Arfan Ikram Wiro J Niessen Olga Ciccarelli Frederik Barkhof Jonathan M Schott Meike W Vernooij Daniel C Alexander for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Differences in topological progression profile among neurodegenerative diseases from imaging data eLife neurodegeneration alzheimer's disease ageing multiple sclerosis disease progression modelling connectivity |
author_facet |
Sara Garbarino Marco Lorenzi Neil P Oxtoby Elisabeth J Vinke Razvan V Marinescu Arman Eshaghi M Arfan Ikram Wiro J Niessen Olga Ciccarelli Frederik Barkhof Jonathan M Schott Meike W Vernooij Daniel C Alexander for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative |
author_sort |
Sara Garbarino |
title |
Differences in topological progression profile among neurodegenerative diseases from imaging data |
title_short |
Differences in topological progression profile among neurodegenerative diseases from imaging data |
title_full |
Differences in topological progression profile among neurodegenerative diseases from imaging data |
title_fullStr |
Differences in topological progression profile among neurodegenerative diseases from imaging data |
title_full_unstemmed |
Differences in topological progression profile among neurodegenerative diseases from imaging data |
title_sort |
differences in topological progression profile among neurodegenerative diseases from imaging data |
publisher |
eLife Sciences Publications Ltd |
series |
eLife |
issn |
2050-084X |
publishDate |
2019-12-01 |
description |
The spatial distribution of atrophy in neurodegenerative diseases suggests that brain connectivity mediates disease propagation. Different descriptors of the connectivity graph potentially relate to different underlying mechanisms of propagation. Previous approaches for evaluating the influence of connectivity on neurodegeneration consider each descriptor in isolation and match predictions against late-stage atrophy patterns. We introduce the notion of a topological profile — a characteristic combination of topological descriptors that best describes the propagation of pathology in a particular disease. By drawing on recent advances in disease progression modeling, we estimate topological profiles from the full course of pathology accumulation, at both cohort and individual levels. Experimental results comparing topological profiles for Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis and normal ageing show that topological profiles explain the observed data better than single descriptors. Within each condition, most individual profiles cluster around the cohort-level profile, and individuals whose profiles align more closely with other cohort-level profiles show features of that cohort. The cohort-level profiles suggest new insights into the biological mechanisms underlying pathology propagation in each disease. |
topic |
neurodegeneration alzheimer's disease ageing multiple sclerosis disease progression modelling connectivity |
url |
https://elifesciences.org/articles/49298 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT saragarbarino differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata AT marcolorenzi differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata AT neilpoxtoby differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata AT elisabethjvinke differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata AT razvanvmarinescu differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata AT armaneshaghi differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata AT marfanikram differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata AT wirojniessen differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata AT olgaciccarelli differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata AT frederikbarkhof differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata AT jonathanmschott differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata AT meikewvernooij differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata AT danielcalexander differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata AT forthealzheimersdiseaseneuroimaginginitiative differencesintopologicalprogressionprofileamongneurodegenerativediseasesfromimagingdata |
_version_ |
1721458735007662080 |