12. Undergraduate Essay Writing: Online and Face-to-Face Peer Reviews

We implemented two different approaches of using peer review to support undergraduate essay assignments for students taking large second-year courses in life sciences and biology: a web-based online peer review (OPR) approach and a more traditional face-to-face peer review (FPR) approach that was c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mike R. Chong, Lori Goff, Kimberly Dej
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2012-06-01
Series:Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching
Online Access:https://celt.uwindsor.ca/index.php/CELT/article/view/3423
id doaj-598ee633758f4e319100e19a030c4fea
record_format Article
spelling doaj-598ee633758f4e319100e19a030c4fea2020-11-25T02:53:59ZengUniversity of WindsorCollected Essays on Learning and Teaching2368-45262012-06-01510.22329/celt.v5i0.342312. Undergraduate Essay Writing: Online and Face-to-Face Peer ReviewsMike R. Chong0Lori Goff1Kimberly Dej2Arts & Science Program McMaster UniversityCentre for Leadership in Learning McMaster UniversityBiology Department & Life Science Program McMaster University We implemented two different approaches of using peer review to support undergraduate essay assignments for students taking large second-year courses in life sciences and biology: a web-based online peer review (OPR) approach and a more traditional face-to-face peer review (FPR) approach that was conducted in tutorial settings. The essays consisted of a review of current literature to discuss the molecular involvement of cancer development or stem-cell growth. Following implementation of the peer reviews, we conducted a preliminary analysis of the pros and cons of using the two methods. Student and instructor feedback suggested that the activity of peer review was generally perceived as valuable regardless of which approach was used. OPR was convenient and saved time and resources relative to FPR, but the technical drawbacks using the OPR approach made it challenging for some students to use. A subsequent investigation using alternative OPR programs that offer additional functionality is planned. https://celt.uwindsor.ca/index.php/CELT/article/view/3423
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mike R. Chong
Lori Goff
Kimberly Dej
spellingShingle Mike R. Chong
Lori Goff
Kimberly Dej
12. Undergraduate Essay Writing: Online and Face-to-Face Peer Reviews
Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching
author_facet Mike R. Chong
Lori Goff
Kimberly Dej
author_sort Mike R. Chong
title 12. Undergraduate Essay Writing: Online and Face-to-Face Peer Reviews
title_short 12. Undergraduate Essay Writing: Online and Face-to-Face Peer Reviews
title_full 12. Undergraduate Essay Writing: Online and Face-to-Face Peer Reviews
title_fullStr 12. Undergraduate Essay Writing: Online and Face-to-Face Peer Reviews
title_full_unstemmed 12. Undergraduate Essay Writing: Online and Face-to-Face Peer Reviews
title_sort 12. undergraduate essay writing: online and face-to-face peer reviews
publisher University of Windsor
series Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching
issn 2368-4526
publishDate 2012-06-01
description We implemented two different approaches of using peer review to support undergraduate essay assignments for students taking large second-year courses in life sciences and biology: a web-based online peer review (OPR) approach and a more traditional face-to-face peer review (FPR) approach that was conducted in tutorial settings. The essays consisted of a review of current literature to discuss the molecular involvement of cancer development or stem-cell growth. Following implementation of the peer reviews, we conducted a preliminary analysis of the pros and cons of using the two methods. Student and instructor feedback suggested that the activity of peer review was generally perceived as valuable regardless of which approach was used. OPR was convenient and saved time and resources relative to FPR, but the technical drawbacks using the OPR approach made it challenging for some students to use. A subsequent investigation using alternative OPR programs that offer additional functionality is planned.
url https://celt.uwindsor.ca/index.php/CELT/article/view/3423
work_keys_str_mv AT mikerchong 12undergraduateessaywritingonlineandfacetofacepeerreviews
AT lorigoff 12undergraduateessaywritingonlineandfacetofacepeerreviews
AT kimberlydej 12undergraduateessaywritingonlineandfacetofacepeerreviews
_version_ 1724723154385895424