Biological Sound vs. Anthropogenic Noise: Assessment of Behavioural Changes in <i>Scyliorhinus canicula</i> Exposed to Boats Noise

• Main Authors: Giovanni de Vincenzi, Primo Micarelli, Salvatore Viola, Gaspare Buffa, Virginia Sciacca, Vincenzo Maccarrone, Valentina Corrias, Francesca Romana Reinero, Cristina Giacoma, Francesco Filiciotto
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2021-01-01
• Series: Animals
• Subjects: small-spotted catshark; biological sounds; anthropogenic noise; signal/noise ratio
• Online Access: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/1/174

Despite the growing interest in human-made noise effects on marine wildlife, few studies have investigated the potential role of underwater noise on elasmobranch species. In this study, twelve specimens of small-spotted catshark (<i>Scyliorhinus canicula</i>) were exposed to biological and anthropogenic sounds in order to assess their behavioural changes in response to prey acoustic stimuli and to different amplitude levels of shipping noise. The sharks, individually held in aquariums, were exposed to four experimental acoustic conditions characterized by different spectral (Hz) components and amplitude (dB re 1 µPa) levels. The swimming behaviour and spatial distribution of sharks were observed. The results highlighted significant differences in swimming time and in the spatial use of the aquarium among the experimental conditions. When the amplitude levels of biological sources were higher than those of anthropogenic sources, the sharks’ swimming behaviour was concentrated in the bottom sections of the aquarium; when the amplitude levels of anthropogenic sources were higher than biological ones, the specimens increased the time spent swimming. Moreover, their spatial distribution highlighted a tendency to occupy the least noisy sections of the aquarium. In conclusion, this study highlighted that anthropogenic noise is able to affect behaviour of catshark specimens and the impact depends on acoustic amplitude levels.