Gender Bias Affects Forests Worldwide

<p>Gender biases persist in forestry research and practice. These biases result in reduced scientific rigor and inequitable, ineffective, and less efficient policies, programs, and interventions. Drawing from a two-volume collection of current and classic analyses on gender in forests, we outl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marlène Elias, Susan S Hummel, Bimbika S Basnett, Carol J.P. Colfer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society of Ethnobiology 2017-04-01
Series:Ethnobiology Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ojs.ethnobiology.org/index.php/ebl/article/view/834
id doaj-59837287a08742a19281ef6d5bd338f8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-59837287a08742a19281ef6d5bd338f82020-11-24T22:55:59ZengSociety of EthnobiologyEthnobiology Letters2159-81262017-04-018110.14237/ebl.8.1.2017.834210Gender Bias Affects Forests WorldwideMarlène Elias0Susan S Hummel1Bimbika S Basnett2Carol J.P. Colfer3Bioversity International, Rome.USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon.Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor.4Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.<p>Gender biases persist in forestry research and practice. These biases result in reduced scientific rigor and inequitable, ineffective, and less efficient policies, programs, and interventions. Drawing from a two-volume collection of current and classic analyses on gender in forests, we outline five persistent and inter-related themes: gendered governance, tree tenure, forest spaces, division of labor, and ecological knowledge. Each emerges across geographic regions in the northern and southern hemisphere and reflects inequities in women’s and men’s ability to make decisions about and benefit from trees, forests, and their products. Women’s ability to participate in community-based forest governance is typically less than men’s, causing concern for social equity and forest stewardship. Women’s access to trees and their products is commonly more limited than men’s, and mediated by their relationship with their male counterparts. Spatial patterns of forest use reflect gender norms and taboos, and men’s greater access to transportation. The division of labor results in gender specialization in the collection of forest products, with variations in gender roles across regions. All these gender differences result in ecological knowledge that is distinct but also complementary and shifting across the genders. The ways gender plays out in relation to each theme may vary across cultures and contexts, but the influence of gender, which intersects with other factors of social differentiation in shaping forest landscapes, is global.</p>http://ojs.ethnobiology.org/index.php/ebl/article/view/834Gender biasGovernanceTenureGendered spacesDivision of laborEcological knowledge
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marlène Elias
Susan S Hummel
Bimbika S Basnett
Carol J.P. Colfer
spellingShingle Marlène Elias
Susan S Hummel
Bimbika S Basnett
Carol J.P. Colfer
Gender Bias Affects Forests Worldwide
Ethnobiology Letters
Gender bias
Governance
Tenure
Gendered spaces
Division of labor
Ecological knowledge
author_facet Marlène Elias
Susan S Hummel
Bimbika S Basnett
Carol J.P. Colfer
author_sort Marlène Elias
title Gender Bias Affects Forests Worldwide
title_short Gender Bias Affects Forests Worldwide
title_full Gender Bias Affects Forests Worldwide
title_fullStr Gender Bias Affects Forests Worldwide
title_full_unstemmed Gender Bias Affects Forests Worldwide
title_sort gender bias affects forests worldwide
publisher Society of Ethnobiology
series Ethnobiology Letters
issn 2159-8126
publishDate 2017-04-01
description <p>Gender biases persist in forestry research and practice. These biases result in reduced scientific rigor and inequitable, ineffective, and less efficient policies, programs, and interventions. Drawing from a two-volume collection of current and classic analyses on gender in forests, we outline five persistent and inter-related themes: gendered governance, tree tenure, forest spaces, division of labor, and ecological knowledge. Each emerges across geographic regions in the northern and southern hemisphere and reflects inequities in women’s and men’s ability to make decisions about and benefit from trees, forests, and their products. Women’s ability to participate in community-based forest governance is typically less than men’s, causing concern for social equity and forest stewardship. Women’s access to trees and their products is commonly more limited than men’s, and mediated by their relationship with their male counterparts. Spatial patterns of forest use reflect gender norms and taboos, and men’s greater access to transportation. The division of labor results in gender specialization in the collection of forest products, with variations in gender roles across regions. All these gender differences result in ecological knowledge that is distinct but also complementary and shifting across the genders. The ways gender plays out in relation to each theme may vary across cultures and contexts, but the influence of gender, which intersects with other factors of social differentiation in shaping forest landscapes, is global.</p>
topic Gender bias
Governance
Tenure
Gendered spaces
Division of labor
Ecological knowledge
url http://ojs.ethnobiology.org/index.php/ebl/article/view/834
work_keys_str_mv AT marleneelias genderbiasaffectsforestsworldwide
AT susanshummel genderbiasaffectsforestsworldwide
AT bimbikasbasnett genderbiasaffectsforestsworldwide
AT caroljpcolfer genderbiasaffectsforestsworldwide
_version_ 1725655310666825728