Okot Pbitek's Song of Lawino and Ocol: A Battle of Cosmos and Ontological Differences

Okot pBitek’s Song of Lawino and Ocol manifests a conflict caused by Cos-mos and Ontological differences between African and western culture. The main character, Lawino in the Song of Lawino, laments of the cultural death of her western educated husband Ocol. Examining the book through the lens of A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: John Madoshi Peter
Format: Article
Language:Bulgarian
Published: SCS Consulting Ltd. 2019-12-01
Series:Venec
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.venets.org/getfile.php?id=302
id doaj-59705629e3f542eca812f917303fba45
record_format Article
spelling doaj-59705629e3f542eca812f917303fba452020-11-24T21:57:25ZbulSCS Consulting Ltd.Venec1314-04261314-02562019-12-011015773Okot Pbitek's Song of Lawino and Ocol: A Battle of Cosmos and Ontological DifferencesJohn Madoshi PeterOkot pBitek’s Song of Lawino and Ocol manifests a conflict caused by Cos-mos and Ontological differences between African and western culture. The main character, Lawino in the Song of Lawino, laments of the cultural death of her western educated husband Ocol. Examining the book through the lens of African Philosophy, it is shown that Lawino has no sufficient knowledge about western cosmos and its ontology. Thus her argument is centered upon the protest and defense of Okoli’s tradition and customs. Two perspectives seem to conflict within Song of Lawino and Ocol. First is the way Ocol views African tradition and customs and second is the way Lawino regards her reli-gion and the foreign religion into which her husband has been converted. Ocol in Song of Ocol, seems to attack the center of African ontology. He sees that Lawino’s beliefs in African tradition and customs is superstation. In the side of argument, Ocol appears to be stronger because he knows the weakness of his society. Being the advocate and prophesying western civilization, he under-stands what he advocates through the knowledge he acquires from reading. (Song of Ocol), Ocol shifts from attacking Ocol’s culture and his attack is ex-tended to African culture in its totality. He attacks the Gikuyu,, the Ankole women of Rwanda and Burundi, the Swahili women with their buibui attires, the Luo, the Karamajong the Kalenjin and the Maasai warriors. The fact that Ocol shifts his attack to cover the large area of African tradition and customs shows that the two characters are used symbolically to represent traditional Africans (Lawino) and educated Africans who who are represented by the character Ocol. However, despite the fact that Ocol is educated, he retains his roots just as Ocol tribe retains his name.http://www.venets.org/getfile.php?id=302african poetrycosmosliteratureontologysong of lawino and ocol
collection DOAJ
language Bulgarian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John Madoshi Peter
spellingShingle John Madoshi Peter
Okot Pbitek's Song of Lawino and Ocol: A Battle of Cosmos and Ontological Differences
Venec
african poetry
cosmos
literature
ontology
song of lawino and ocol
author_facet John Madoshi Peter
author_sort John Madoshi Peter
title Okot Pbitek's Song of Lawino and Ocol: A Battle of Cosmos and Ontological Differences
title_short Okot Pbitek's Song of Lawino and Ocol: A Battle of Cosmos and Ontological Differences
title_full Okot Pbitek's Song of Lawino and Ocol: A Battle of Cosmos and Ontological Differences
title_fullStr Okot Pbitek's Song of Lawino and Ocol: A Battle of Cosmos and Ontological Differences
title_full_unstemmed Okot Pbitek's Song of Lawino and Ocol: A Battle of Cosmos and Ontological Differences
title_sort okot pbitek's song of lawino and ocol: a battle of cosmos and ontological differences
publisher SCS Consulting Ltd.
series Venec
issn 1314-0426
1314-0256
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Okot pBitek’s Song of Lawino and Ocol manifests a conflict caused by Cos-mos and Ontological differences between African and western culture. The main character, Lawino in the Song of Lawino, laments of the cultural death of her western educated husband Ocol. Examining the book through the lens of African Philosophy, it is shown that Lawino has no sufficient knowledge about western cosmos and its ontology. Thus her argument is centered upon the protest and defense of Okoli’s tradition and customs. Two perspectives seem to conflict within Song of Lawino and Ocol. First is the way Ocol views African tradition and customs and second is the way Lawino regards her reli-gion and the foreign religion into which her husband has been converted. Ocol in Song of Ocol, seems to attack the center of African ontology. He sees that Lawino’s beliefs in African tradition and customs is superstation. In the side of argument, Ocol appears to be stronger because he knows the weakness of his society. Being the advocate and prophesying western civilization, he under-stands what he advocates through the knowledge he acquires from reading. (Song of Ocol), Ocol shifts from attacking Ocol’s culture and his attack is ex-tended to African culture in its totality. He attacks the Gikuyu,, the Ankole women of Rwanda and Burundi, the Swahili women with their buibui attires, the Luo, the Karamajong the Kalenjin and the Maasai warriors. The fact that Ocol shifts his attack to cover the large area of African tradition and customs shows that the two characters are used symbolically to represent traditional Africans (Lawino) and educated Africans who who are represented by the character Ocol. However, despite the fact that Ocol is educated, he retains his roots just as Ocol tribe retains his name.
topic african poetry
cosmos
literature
ontology
song of lawino and ocol
url http://www.venets.org/getfile.php?id=302
work_keys_str_mv AT johnmadoshipeter okotpbitekssongoflawinoandocolabattleofcosmosandontologicaldifferences
_version_ 1725855628774080512