In vitro synergism of a water insoluble fraction of Uncaria tomentosa combined with fluconazole and terbinafine against resistant non-Candida albicans isolates

• Main Authors: Renata Cougo Moraes, Anderson Ramos Carvalho, Aline Jacobi Dalla Lana, Samuel Kaiser, Bruna Pippi, Alexandre Meneghello Fuentefria, George González Ortega
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2017-01-01
• Series: Pharmaceutical Biology
• Subjects: natural products; checkerboard; antifungal resistance; candida; polyphenols
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13880209.2016.1242631

Context: Uncaria tomentosa D.C. (Rubiaceae) has several biological activities, including activity against resistant Candida strains. The synergistic interaction with terbinafine or fluconazole can be an important alternative to overcome this resistance. Objectives: The potential synergy between a water insoluble fraction (WIF) from Uncaria tomentosa bark and the antifungals terbinafine (TRB) and fluconazole (FLZ) against non-Candida albicans resistant strains was investigated. Materials and methods: TRB and FLZ, alone and combined with WIF, were tested by the checkerboard procedure using the micro-dilution technique against seven isolates of Candida glabrata and C. krusei. The molecular interactions occurring outside the cell wall were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis. Results: The checkerboard inhibitory assay demonstrated synergy for WIF:TRB and WIF:FLZ combinations, respectively. The best synergistic cell damage was demonstrated unequivocally for the associations of WIF and TRB (1.95:4.0 μg/mL) and WIF and FLZ (1.95:8.0 μg/mL). The comparison of the FT-IR spectra of the antifungal alone, and in combination with WIF, allows recognizing clear differences in 3000, 1600, 1400, and 700–800 cm−1 bands. Additionally, modifications on TRB and FLZ thermograms were clearly noticed after their combination with WIF. Conclusions: DSC and infrared analysis demonstrated intermolecular interactions between WIF and either TRB or FLZ. Hence, quite likely the synergistic effect is related to interaction events occurring outside the cell wall between antifungal and cat’s claw proanthocyanidins. A direct action on the cell wall is suggested, without connection with the ABC efflux pump mechanism.