P7.18 VALIDATION TESTING FOR THE NON-INVASIVE MEASUREMENT OF AORTIC RESERVOIR CHARACTERISTICS FROM BRACHIAL CUFF OSCILLOMERIC PRESSURE WAVEFORMS

Background: Aortic reservoir pressure (RP) and excess pressure (XSP) derived non-invasively from radial tonometry independently predict cardiovascular events and mortality. However, whether RP and XSP can be derived non-invasively from brachial oscillometric cuff pressure waveforms has never been un...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaoqing Peng*, Martin Schultz, Justin Davies, Dean Picone, Andrew Black, Nathan Dwyer, Phil Roberts-Thomson, James Sharman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Atlantis Press 2015-11-01
Series:Artery Research
Online Access:https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930670/view
id doaj-5941961cffb2445ba8c130c4c78c7bdf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5941961cffb2445ba8c130c4c78c7bdf2020-11-25T03:01:46ZengAtlantis PressArtery Research 1876-44012015-11-011210.1016/j.artres.2015.10.321P7.18 VALIDATION TESTING FOR THE NON-INVASIVE MEASUREMENT OF AORTIC RESERVOIR CHARACTERISTICS FROM BRACHIAL CUFF OSCILLOMERIC PRESSURE WAVEFORMSXiaoqing Peng*Martin SchultzJustin DaviesDean PiconeAndrew BlackNathan DwyerPhil Roberts-ThomsonJames SharmanBackground: Aortic reservoir pressure (RP) and excess pressure (XSP) derived non-invasively from radial tonometry independently predict cardiovascular events and mortality. However, whether RP and XSP can be derived non-invasively from brachial oscillometric cuff pressure waveforms has never been undertaken. This study sought to determine the validity of measuring aortic reservoir characteristics from non-invasive oscillometric cuff waveforms. Methods: 97 participants (aged 62±11 years, 67% male) undergoing coronary angiography had simultaneous measurement (n=247) of ascending aortic pressure (via fluid-filled catheter) and oscillometric brachial cuff pressure (via SphygmoCor XCEL). RP and XSP derived non-invasively from cuff waveforms were compared with invasive measures. Results: There were small mean differences between non-invasive and invasive methods for both RP (1.42±18.16 mmHg) and XSP (−1.45±25.52 mmHg), with significant corrleations observed between methods (p<0.001 both). Conclusion: Aortic reservoir characteristics of RP and XSP can be derived non-invasively from oscillometric brachial pressure waveforms, thus providing a mean for widespread research and clinical use.https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930670/view
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xiaoqing Peng*
Martin Schultz
Justin Davies
Dean Picone
Andrew Black
Nathan Dwyer
Phil Roberts-Thomson
James Sharman
spellingShingle Xiaoqing Peng*
Martin Schultz
Justin Davies
Dean Picone
Andrew Black
Nathan Dwyer
Phil Roberts-Thomson
James Sharman
P7.18 VALIDATION TESTING FOR THE NON-INVASIVE MEASUREMENT OF AORTIC RESERVOIR CHARACTERISTICS FROM BRACHIAL CUFF OSCILLOMERIC PRESSURE WAVEFORMS
Artery Research
author_facet Xiaoqing Peng*
Martin Schultz
Justin Davies
Dean Picone
Andrew Black
Nathan Dwyer
Phil Roberts-Thomson
James Sharman
author_sort Xiaoqing Peng*
title P7.18 VALIDATION TESTING FOR THE NON-INVASIVE MEASUREMENT OF AORTIC RESERVOIR CHARACTERISTICS FROM BRACHIAL CUFF OSCILLOMERIC PRESSURE WAVEFORMS
title_short P7.18 VALIDATION TESTING FOR THE NON-INVASIVE MEASUREMENT OF AORTIC RESERVOIR CHARACTERISTICS FROM BRACHIAL CUFF OSCILLOMERIC PRESSURE WAVEFORMS
title_full P7.18 VALIDATION TESTING FOR THE NON-INVASIVE MEASUREMENT OF AORTIC RESERVOIR CHARACTERISTICS FROM BRACHIAL CUFF OSCILLOMERIC PRESSURE WAVEFORMS
title_fullStr P7.18 VALIDATION TESTING FOR THE NON-INVASIVE MEASUREMENT OF AORTIC RESERVOIR CHARACTERISTICS FROM BRACHIAL CUFF OSCILLOMERIC PRESSURE WAVEFORMS
title_full_unstemmed P7.18 VALIDATION TESTING FOR THE NON-INVASIVE MEASUREMENT OF AORTIC RESERVOIR CHARACTERISTICS FROM BRACHIAL CUFF OSCILLOMERIC PRESSURE WAVEFORMS
title_sort p7.18 validation testing for the non-invasive measurement of aortic reservoir characteristics from brachial cuff oscillomeric pressure waveforms
publisher Atlantis Press
series Artery Research
issn 1876-4401
publishDate 2015-11-01
description Background: Aortic reservoir pressure (RP) and excess pressure (XSP) derived non-invasively from radial tonometry independently predict cardiovascular events and mortality. However, whether RP and XSP can be derived non-invasively from brachial oscillometric cuff pressure waveforms has never been undertaken. This study sought to determine the validity of measuring aortic reservoir characteristics from non-invasive oscillometric cuff waveforms. Methods: 97 participants (aged 62±11 years, 67% male) undergoing coronary angiography had simultaneous measurement (n=247) of ascending aortic pressure (via fluid-filled catheter) and oscillometric brachial cuff pressure (via SphygmoCor XCEL). RP and XSP derived non-invasively from cuff waveforms were compared with invasive measures. Results: There were small mean differences between non-invasive and invasive methods for both RP (1.42±18.16 mmHg) and XSP (−1.45±25.52 mmHg), with significant corrleations observed between methods (p<0.001 both). Conclusion: Aortic reservoir characteristics of RP and XSP can be derived non-invasively from oscillometric brachial pressure waveforms, thus providing a mean for widespread research and clinical use.
url https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930670/view
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoqingpeng p718validationtestingforthenoninvasivemeasurementofaorticreservoircharacteristicsfrombrachialcuffoscillomericpressurewaveforms
AT martinschultz p718validationtestingforthenoninvasivemeasurementofaorticreservoircharacteristicsfrombrachialcuffoscillomericpressurewaveforms
AT justindavies p718validationtestingforthenoninvasivemeasurementofaorticreservoircharacteristicsfrombrachialcuffoscillomericpressurewaveforms
AT deanpicone p718validationtestingforthenoninvasivemeasurementofaorticreservoircharacteristicsfrombrachialcuffoscillomericpressurewaveforms
AT andrewblack p718validationtestingforthenoninvasivemeasurementofaorticreservoircharacteristicsfrombrachialcuffoscillomericpressurewaveforms
AT nathandwyer p718validationtestingforthenoninvasivemeasurementofaorticreservoircharacteristicsfrombrachialcuffoscillomericpressurewaveforms
AT philrobertsthomson p718validationtestingforthenoninvasivemeasurementofaorticreservoircharacteristicsfrombrachialcuffoscillomericpressurewaveforms
AT jamessharman p718validationtestingforthenoninvasivemeasurementofaorticreservoircharacteristicsfrombrachialcuffoscillomericpressurewaveforms
_version_ 1724692155723677696