Clinical Indications of Computed Tomography (CT) of the Head in Patients With Low-Energy Geriatric Hip Fractures: A Follow-Up Study at a Community Hospital

Introduction: A seemingly large percentage of geriatric patients with isolated low-energy femur fractures undergo a head computed tomography (CT) scans during initial work up in the emergency department. This study aimed to evaluate the pertinent clinical variables that are associated with positive...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kris Danielson DO, Teresa Hall DO, Terrence Endres MD, Clifford Jones MD, Deb Sietsema PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-07-01
Series:Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2151459319861562
id doaj-59326788374c48cea8600a4b21ea120e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-59326788374c48cea8600a4b21ea120e2020-11-25T03:49:35ZengSAGE PublishingGeriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation2151-45932019-07-011010.1177/2151459319861562Clinical Indications of Computed Tomography (CT) of the Head in Patients With Low-Energy Geriatric Hip Fractures: A Follow-Up Study at a Community HospitalKris Danielson DO0Teresa Hall DO1Terrence Endres MD2Clifford Jones MD3Deb Sietsema PhD4 Metro Health Hospital, Wyoming, MI, USA Metro Health University of Michigan Health, Wyoming, MI, USA Orthopaedic Associates, Michigan State University/CHM of Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI, USA Orthopaedic Associates, Michigan State University/CHM of Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI, USA The CORE Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USAIntroduction: A seemingly large percentage of geriatric patients with isolated low-energy femur fractures undergo a head computed tomography (CT) scans during initial work up in the emergency department. This study aimed to evaluate the pertinent clinical variables that are associated with positive CT findings with the objective to decrease the number of unnecessary CT scans performed. Methods: A retrospective review performed at a level II trauma center including 713 patients over the age of 65 sustaining a femur fracture following a low-energy fall. The main outcome measure was pertinent clinical variables that are associated with CT scans that yielded positive findings. Results: A total of 713 patients over the age of 65 were included, with a low-energy fall, of which 76.2% (543/713) underwent a head CT scan as part of their evaluation. The most common presenting symptom reported was the patient hitting their head, 13% (93/713), and 1.8% (13/713) were unsure if they had hit their head. Of those evaluated with a head CT scan, only 3 (0.4%) had acute findings and none required acute neurosurgical intervention. All three patients with acute changes on the head CT scan had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) greater than 9, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) less than 15, and evidence of trauma above the clavicles. Discussion: None of the patients with a traumatic injury required a neurosurgical intervention after sustaining a low-energy fall (0/713). Conclusion: Head CT scans should have a limited role in the workup of this patient population and should be reserved for patients with a history and physical exam findings that support head trauma, an ISS > 9 and GCS < 15.https://doi.org/10.1177/2151459319861562
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kris Danielson DO
Teresa Hall DO
Terrence Endres MD
Clifford Jones MD
Deb Sietsema PhD
spellingShingle Kris Danielson DO
Teresa Hall DO
Terrence Endres MD
Clifford Jones MD
Deb Sietsema PhD
Clinical Indications of Computed Tomography (CT) of the Head in Patients With Low-Energy Geriatric Hip Fractures: A Follow-Up Study at a Community Hospital
Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation
author_facet Kris Danielson DO
Teresa Hall DO
Terrence Endres MD
Clifford Jones MD
Deb Sietsema PhD
author_sort Kris Danielson DO
title Clinical Indications of Computed Tomography (CT) of the Head in Patients With Low-Energy Geriatric Hip Fractures: A Follow-Up Study at a Community Hospital
title_short Clinical Indications of Computed Tomography (CT) of the Head in Patients With Low-Energy Geriatric Hip Fractures: A Follow-Up Study at a Community Hospital
title_full Clinical Indications of Computed Tomography (CT) of the Head in Patients With Low-Energy Geriatric Hip Fractures: A Follow-Up Study at a Community Hospital
title_fullStr Clinical Indications of Computed Tomography (CT) of the Head in Patients With Low-Energy Geriatric Hip Fractures: A Follow-Up Study at a Community Hospital
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Indications of Computed Tomography (CT) of the Head in Patients With Low-Energy Geriatric Hip Fractures: A Follow-Up Study at a Community Hospital
title_sort clinical indications of computed tomography (ct) of the head in patients with low-energy geriatric hip fractures: a follow-up study at a community hospital
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation
issn 2151-4593
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Introduction: A seemingly large percentage of geriatric patients with isolated low-energy femur fractures undergo a head computed tomography (CT) scans during initial work up in the emergency department. This study aimed to evaluate the pertinent clinical variables that are associated with positive CT findings with the objective to decrease the number of unnecessary CT scans performed. Methods: A retrospective review performed at a level II trauma center including 713 patients over the age of 65 sustaining a femur fracture following a low-energy fall. The main outcome measure was pertinent clinical variables that are associated with CT scans that yielded positive findings. Results: A total of 713 patients over the age of 65 were included, with a low-energy fall, of which 76.2% (543/713) underwent a head CT scan as part of their evaluation. The most common presenting symptom reported was the patient hitting their head, 13% (93/713), and 1.8% (13/713) were unsure if they had hit their head. Of those evaluated with a head CT scan, only 3 (0.4%) had acute findings and none required acute neurosurgical intervention. All three patients with acute changes on the head CT scan had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) greater than 9, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) less than 15, and evidence of trauma above the clavicles. Discussion: None of the patients with a traumatic injury required a neurosurgical intervention after sustaining a low-energy fall (0/713). Conclusion: Head CT scans should have a limited role in the workup of this patient population and should be reserved for patients with a history and physical exam findings that support head trauma, an ISS > 9 and GCS < 15.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2151459319861562
work_keys_str_mv AT krisdanielsondo clinicalindicationsofcomputedtomographyctoftheheadinpatientswithlowenergygeriatrichipfracturesafollowupstudyatacommunityhospital
AT teresahalldo clinicalindicationsofcomputedtomographyctoftheheadinpatientswithlowenergygeriatrichipfracturesafollowupstudyatacommunityhospital
AT terrenceendresmd clinicalindicationsofcomputedtomographyctoftheheadinpatientswithlowenergygeriatrichipfracturesafollowupstudyatacommunityhospital
AT cliffordjonesmd clinicalindicationsofcomputedtomographyctoftheheadinpatientswithlowenergygeriatrichipfracturesafollowupstudyatacommunityhospital
AT debsietsemaphd clinicalindicationsofcomputedtomographyctoftheheadinpatientswithlowenergygeriatrichipfracturesafollowupstudyatacommunityhospital
_version_ 1724494577951309824